Current and Future Challenges of Terrorism
Copyright (c) 2026 Krunoslav Antoliš, Rémai Dániel József

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Absztrakt
Counterterrorism is a dynamic field focused on adapting to the evolving nature of terrorism and developing effective strategies to prevent and address these threats. As terrorism becomes more decentralised, utilising technologies like social media, cyber tools and lone-wolf attacks, it becomes increasingly difficult to track and combat. To counter this, strategies involve intelligence gathering, military operations, law enforcement coordination, and efforts to counter radicalisation, with new technologies such as surveillance and data analysis playing a significant role.
Current challenges include the rise of online extremism, difficulties in distinguishing between legitimate political actions and terrorism, and the instability in fragile or failed states. Looking ahead, the future of terrorism may see emerging threats such as cyberterrorism, the use of artificial intelligence in attacks, and the exploitation of global crises like pandemics or economic collapses by terrorist groups.
Ethical and legal concerns also complicate counterterrorism efforts, raising questions about privacy, potential discrimination, and the legality of actions like surveillance and drone strikes. Furthermore, terrorism increasingly intersects with global challenges such as climate change and migration, making it harder to address.
A successful counterterrorism approach requires a comprehensive strategy that blends military, law enforcement, diplomatic and ideological efforts, along with strong international cooperation. Ultimately, counterterrorism must remain flexible in the face of evolving threats while balancing security concerns with respect for human rights.
Aim: This paper aims to examine the evolving nature of contemporary terrorism and to assess how counterterrorism strategies must adapt to increasingly decentralised, technology-enabled threat environments. It seeks to identify key operational, technological, legal, and ethical challenges shaping current and future counterterrorism efforts.
Methodology: The analysis is based on a conceptual and strategic review of current counterterrorism practices and emerging threat trends. It integrates perspectives from security studies, law enforcement practice, technological development (e.g. surveillance systems, data analytics, artificial intelligence), and international governance frameworks. The approach is analytical and forward-looking, focusing on pattern identification rather than case-specific empirical analysis.
Value: The study highlights the structural transformation of terrorism – marked by decentralisation, online radicalisation, lone-actor dynamics and the growing relevance of cyber capabilities – and maps these changes onto existing counterterrorism architectures. It underscores critical tensions between security and civil liberties, particularly in relation to surveillance, data use, targeted operations and the legal classification of violent acts. By addressing emerging risks such as cyberterrorism, AI-assisted attacks, and the exploitation of systemic crises (e.g. pandemics, economic instability, fragile state environments), the paper contributes to a more integrated understanding of future threat trajectories. It also emphasises the increasing interconnection between terrorism and broader global stressors, including migration pressures and climate-related instability.
Conclusion: Effective counterterrorism requires a comprehensive and adaptive framework that integrates military capabilities, law enforcement coordination, intelligence sharing, diplomatic engagement and counter-radicalisation efforts. Long-term success depends on strong international cooperation and institutional flexibility in responding to technological and geopolitical shifts. At the same time, sustainable counterterrorism policy must carefully balance operational effectiveness with adherence to legal standards and the protection of fundamental rights.
Kulcsszavak:
Hogyan kell idézni
Hivatkozások
ACKERMAN, Gary A. (2018): Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear (CBRN) Terrorism. In SILKE, Andrew (ed.): Routledge Handbook of Terrorism and Counterterrorism. London: Routledge, 240–252. Online: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315744636-21
ACLU (2020): Surveillance under the Patriot Act. American Civil Liberties Union. Online: https://www.aclu.org/surveillance-under-the-patriot-act
ALDRICH, Richard J. (2009): Global Intelligence Co-operation versus Accountability: New Facets to an Old Problem. Intelligence and National Security, 24(1), 26–56. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/02684520902756812
ALSTON, Philip (2010): Report of the Special Rapporteur on Extrajudicial, Summary, or Arbitrary Executions. United Nations Human Rights Council. Online: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/683892/files/A_HRC_14_24_Add.2-EN.pdf?ln=en
Amnesty International (2021): Guantanamo Bay: A Human Rights Scandal. Online: https://www.amnesty.org/en/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/amr511592006en.pdf
BASSIOUNI, Cherif M. (2001): International Terrorism. Multilateral Conventions (1937–2001). Ardsley: Transnational Publishers. Online: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004478428
BIERSTEKER, Thomas J. – ECKERT, Sue E. (2008): Countering the Financing of Terrorism. London: Routledge. Online: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203944639
BIGO, Didier (2008): Globalized (In)Security: The Field and the Ban-Opticon. In BIGO, Didier –TSOUKALA, Anastassia (eds.): Terror, Insecurity and Liberty. Illiberal Practices of Liberal Regimes after 9/11. London: Routledge, 10–48. Online: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203926765
BRYNJOLFSSON, Erik – MCAFEE, Andrew (2016): The Second Machine Age. Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
BYMAN, Daniel (2015): Al Qaeda, the Islamic State, and the Global Jihadist Movement. What Everyone Needs to Know. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/wentk/9780190217259.001.0001
CRONIN, Audrey K. (2021): Power to the People. How Open Technological Innovation is Arming Tomorrow’s Terrorists. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
FREY, John (2004): The 9/11 Commission Report: Final Report of the National Commission on Terrorist attacks upon the United States. British Journal of General Practice, 54(509), 966–967.
GUNARATNA, Rohan (2016): The Global Terrorist Threat. A Comprehensive Guide. Singapore: World Scientific.
HAIDER, Huma (2014): Refugee, IDP and Host Community Radicalisation. GSDRC Helpdesk Report. Online: https://gsdrc.org/publications/refugee-idp-and-host-community-radicalisation/
HOFFMAN, Bruce (2006): Inside Terrorism. New York: Columbia University Press.
HULNICK, Arthur S. (2004): Keeping Us Safe. Secret Intelligence and Homeland Security. Westport: Praeger. Online: https://doi.org/10.5040/9798400675577
Human Rights Watch (2020): World Report 2020. HRW Reports. Online: https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2020
IGNATIEFF, Michael (2004): The Lesser Evil. Political Ethics in an Age of Terror. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Online: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400850686
Interpol (2020): Annual Report 2020. Connecting Police for a Safer World. Online: https://www.interpol.int/content/download/16499/file/Annual%20report%202020_EN_i.pdf
KUNDNANI, Arun (2014): The Muslims are Coming! Islamophobia, Extremism, and the Domestic War on Terror. London – New York: Verso Books.
LAQUEUR, Walter (1996): Postmodern Terrorism. Foreign Affairs, 75(5), 24–36. Online: https://doi.org/10.2307/20047741
LEWIS, James A. (2022): Cyber War and Ukraine. Center for Strategic and International Studies. Online: https://www.csis.org/analysis/cyber-war-and-ukraine
LYON, David (2015): Surveillance after Snowden. Cambridge: Polity Press.
MACH, Katharine J. et al. (2019): Climate as a Risk Factor for Armed Conflict. Nature, 571(7764), 193–197. Online: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1300-6
MAKARENKO, Tamara (2004): The Crime-Terror Continuum: Tracing the Interplay between Transnational Crime and Terrorism. Global Crime, 6(1), 129–145. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/1744057042000297025
MARAS, Marie-Helen (2016): A terrorizmus elmélete és gyakorlata. Budapest: Antall József Tudásközpont.
NEUMANN, Peter R. (2016): Radicalized. New Jihadists and the Threat to the West. London: I. B. Tauris. Online: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350987692
PIAZZA, James A. (2011): Poverty, Minority Economic Discrimination, and Domestic Terrorism. Journal of Peace Research, 48(3), 339–353. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343310397404
RÉMAI, Dániel (2020): Egy majdnem tökéletes társadalmi jelzőrendszer? [An Almost Perfect Social Signalling System?] Arc és Álarc: A Hamvas Intézet Folyóirata, 4(2), 189–220. Online: https://real.mtak.hu/120953/7/101_HAMVAS_2020_2.pdf
ROACH, Ken (2011): The 9/11 Effect. Comparative Counter-Terrorism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Online: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139003537
SCHEININ, Martin (2016): Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms while Countering Terrorism. United Nations General Assembly – Human Rights Council. Online: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/595030?ln=en&v=pdf
SCHMID, Alex (2004): Terrorism – The Definitional Problem. Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, 36(2), 375–419. Online: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/jil/vol36/iss2/8
SHELLEY, Louise I. (2014): Dirty Entanglements. Corruption, Crime, and Terrorism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Online: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139059039
SILKE, Andrew (2008): Research on Terrorism. A Review of the Impact of 9/11 and the Global War on Terrorism. In CHEN, Hsinchun – REID, Edna – SINAI, Joshua – SILKE, Andrew – GANOR, Boaz (eds.): Terrorism Informatics. Knowledge Management and Data Mining for Homeland Security. New York: Springer, 27–50. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-71613-8_2
SPAAIJ, Ramon (2012): Understanding Lone Wolf Terrorism. Global Patterns, Motivations, and Prevention. Dordrecht: Springer. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2981-0
SUSSMAN, David (2005): What’s Wrong with Torture? Philosophy & Public Affairs, 33(1), 1–33. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2005.00023.x
STERN, Jessica – BERGER, John M. (2015): ISIS. The State of Terror. New York: Ecco.
TUCKER, Jonathan B. ed. (2018): Innovation, Dual Use, and Security. Managing the Risks of Emerging Biological and Chemical Technologies. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
United Nation (2001): Security Council Resolution 1373. Online: https://docs.un.org/en/S/RES/1373(2001)
United Nations (2011): Interagency Coordination in the Event of a Terrorist Attack Using Chemical or Biological Weapons or Materials. United Nations Counter-Terrorism Implementation Task Force (CTITF). Online: https://www.opcw.org/sites/default/files/documents/PDF/CTITF_2011_Report.pdf
UNODC (2021): Afghanistan Opium Survey 2021. Vienna: United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. Online: https://www.unodc.org/documents/crop-monitoring/Afghanistan/Afghanistan_Opium_Survey_2021.pdf
WEIMANN, Gabriel (2015): Terrorism in Cyberspace. The Next Generation. New York: Woodrow Wilson Center Press – Columbia University Press.
ZENKO, Micah (2015): Red Team. How to Succeed by Thinking Like the Enemy. New York: Basic Books.