Three Paradigms, Two Decades – Paradigm Shifts in the EU’s Counter-Terrorism Policy

A Comparative Analysis of the EU’s Counter-Terrorism Strategies 2005 – 2020 – 2024/2025

Abstract

Introduction: Over the past two decades, the European Union’s counter-terrorism policy has been articulated through several comprehensive strategic documents that responded to different security challenges and institutional contexts. However, it remains insufficiently explored to what extent these documents represent genuine paradigm shifts and what structural logic has guided the evolution of the EU’s approach.

Objectives: The aim of this study is to provide a comparative analysis of the EU’s counter-terrorism strategies, with a particular focus on changes in their strategic orientation.

Methodology: The research is based on qualitative document analysis of the European Union Counter-Terrorism Strategy (2005), the Counter-Terrorism Agenda (2020), the 2024 Council Conclusions, and the 2025 ProtectEU Strategy. Within a historical approach grounded in European terrorism trends, the study compares the circumstances of their adoption, threat perceptions, and strategic objectives.

Results: The analysis demonstrates that the three strategic periods represent distinct security policy paradigms. The 2005 strategy primarily adopted a reactive, state-centred, and attack-focused approach, shaped by the impact of 9/11 and the Madrid and London attacks. The 2020 Counter-Terrorism Agenda responded to the growing importance of radicalisation, prevention, and the online environment within a more integrated institutional framework. The 2024–2025 documents interpret terrorism within the broader context of hybrid threats, geopolitical instability, and technological risks, placing emphasis on resilience, critical infrastructure protection, and societal preparedness. Accordingly, the strategic logic has shifted from a traditional counter-terrorism approach towards comprehensive security policy integration.

Conclusion: The study concludes that the EU’s counter-terrorism policy has not merely evolved incrementally but has undergone fundamental paradigm shifts in several phases. The focus has moved from reaction to prevention, and subsequently to complex threat management. A particularly important direction for future research is the examination of terrorism within the broader system of complex security threats.

Keywords:

terrorism counter terror strategy European Union strategy

How to Cite

Szabó, H., & Rémai, D. Three Paradigms, Two Decades – Paradigm Shifts in the EU’s Counter-Terrorism Policy: A Comparative Analysis of the EU’s Counter-Terrorism Strategies 2005 – 2020 – 2024/2025. Hungarian Law Enforcement, 26(1). Retrieved from https://folyoirat.ludovika.hu/index.php/magyrend/article/view/8737

References

ANDREEVA, Christine (2025): The Zerkani Network and the 2015 Paris and 2016 Brussels Attacks. An Illustration of Counter-Terrorism Dysfunction in Europe. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 48(11), 1313–1341. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2023.2178078

BAKER-BEALL, Christopher – MOTT, Gareth (2021): The New EU Counter-Terrorism Agenda: Preemptive Security through the Anticipation of Terrorist Events. Global Affairs, 7(5), 711–732. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/23340460.2021.1995461

BENDIEK, Annegret (2006): EU Strategy on Counter Terrorism. Steps Towards a Coherent Network Policy. SWP Research Paper RP 12/2006. Berlin: Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik. Online: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/253063/1/2006RP12.pdf

BURES, Oldrich (2006): EU Counterterrorism Policy: A Paper Tiger? Terrorism and Political Violence, 18(1), 57–78. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/09546550500174905

Council of the European Union (2005): The European Union Counter-Terrorism Strategy. ST 14469/4/05 REV 4. Brussels, 30 November 2005. Online: https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST%2014469%202005%20REV%204/EN/pdf

Council of the European Union (2024a): The Role of Climate Change and Environmental Concerns in Violent Extremist and Terrorist Radicalisation in the EU (No. 5982/24). 30 January 2024. Online: https://www.statewatch.org/media/4188/eu-ctc-violent-environmental-extremism-twp-paper-5982-24.pdf

Council of the European Union (2024b): Conclusions on Future Priorities for Strengthening the Joint Counterterrorism Efforts. ST 16820/24. 12 December 2024. Online: https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-16820-2024-INIT/en/pdf

Council of the European Union (2024c): Conclusions on Reinforcing External-Internal Connections in the Fight against Terrorism and Violent Extremism. 16 December 2024. Online: https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-16175-2024-INIT/en/pdf

D’AMATO, Silvia – TERLIZZI, Andrea (2022): Strategic European Counterterrorism? An Empirical Analysis. European Security, 31(4), 540–557. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2022.2029847

DAVIES, Garth – WU, Edith – FRANK, Richard (2021): A Witch’s Brew of Grievances. The Potential Effects of COVID-19 on Radicalization to Violent Extremism. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 46(11), 2327–2350. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2021.1923188

European Commission (2020): A Counter-Terrorism Agenda for the EU: Anticipate, Prevent, Protect, Respond. COM(2020) 795 final. Brussels, 9 December 2020.

European Commission (2025): ProtectEU: a European Internal Security Strategy. COM/2025/148 final. Online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52025DC0148

European Parliament (2018): Report on findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on Terrorism. A8-0374/2018. Online: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2018-0374_EN.html

European Parliamentary Research Service (2025): The New European Internal Security Strategy: ProtectEU. EPRS BRI(2025)775847. Online: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2025/775847/EPRS_BRI(2025)775847_EN.pdf

Europol (2023): European Union Terrorism Situation and Trend report 2023 (TE-SAT). The Hague: Europol. Online: https://www.europol.europa.eu/publication-events/main-reports/european-union-terrorism-situation-and-trend-report-2023-te-sat

Europol (2024): European Union Terrorism Situation and Trend Report (TE-SAT) 2024. The Hague: Europol. Online: https://www.europol.europa.eu/publication-events/main-reports/european-union-terrorism-situation-and-trend-report-2024-eu-te-sat

Europol (2025): European Union Terrorism Situation and Trend Report (TE-SAT) 2025. The Hague: Europol. Online: https://www.europol.europa.eu/publication-events/main-reports/european-union-terrorism-situation-and-trend-report-2025-eu-te-sat

Global Terrorism Database (2021). Online: https://www.start.umd.edu/data-tools/GTD

GUNARATNA, Rohan – OREG, Aviv (2010): Al Qaeda’s Organizational Structure and Its Evolution. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 33(12), 1043–1078. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2010.523860

HOFFMAN, Bruce (2006): Combating Al Qaeda and the Militant Islamic Threat (Testimony No. CT-255). Santa Monica: RAND Corporation. Online: https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/testimonies/2006/RAND_CT255.pdf

JORDAN, Javier – MAÑAS, M. Fernando – HORSBURGH, Nicola (2008): Strengths and Weaknesses of Grassroot Jihadist Networks: The Madrid Bombings. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 31(1), 17–39. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/10576100701767148

KIRKWOOD, Lea T. (2006): The European Union Counter-Terrorism Strategy: Origins, Problems, and Prospects. Master’s Thesis. Monterey: Naval Postgraduate School.

KOEHLER, Daniel (2018): Recent Trends in German Right-Wing Violence and Terrorism: What are the Contextual Factors behind ‘Hive Terrorism’? Perspectives on Terrorism, 12(6), 72–88.

MELHUISH, Francesca – HEATH-KELLY, Charlotte (2022): Fighting Terrorism at the Local Level: the European Union, Radicalisation Prevention and the Negotiation of Subsidiarity. European Security, 31(2), 313–333. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2021.2009458

MONAR, Jörg (2007): Common Threat and Common Response? The European Union’s Counter-Terrorism Strategy and its Problems. Government and Opposition, 42(3), 292–313. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2007.00225.x

NESSER, Petter (2019): Military Interventions, Jihadi Networks, and Terrorist Entrepreneurs: How the Islamic State Terror Wave Rose So High in Europe. CTC Sentinel, 12(3), 15–21. Online: https://ctc.westpoint.edu/military-interventions-jihadi-networks-terrorist-entrepreneurs-islamic-state-terror-wave-rose-high-europe/

PANTUCCI, Raffaello (2010): A Contest to Democracy? How the UK Has Responded to the Current Terrorist Threat. Democratization, 17(2), 251–271. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/13510341003588674

RENARD, Thomas (2025): Adolescent Radicalisation: It’s Not Just on Netflix. European Comission, 2025. április 29. Online: https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/home/items/880571/en

VAN GINKEL, Bibi – ENTENMANN, Eva eds. (2016): The Foreign Fighters Phenomenon in the European Union. Profiles, Threats & Policies. ICCT Research Paper. The Hague: ICCT.

VIDINO, Lorenzo – MARONE, Francesco – ENTENMANN, Eva (2017): Fear Thy Neighbor: Radicalization and Jihadist Attacks in the West. Milan: Ledizioni LediPublishing. Online: https://extremism.gwu.edu/sites/g/files/zaxdzs5746/files/FearThyNeighbor%20RadicalizationandJihadistAttacksintheWest.pdf

WALLNER, Claudia  WHITE, Jessica (2022): The Prince, the Judge and the Paratrooper: Germany’s Foiled Far-Right Coup. RUSI, 2022. december 12. Online: https://www.rusi.org/explore-our-research/publications/commentary/prince-judge-and-paratrooper-germanys-foiled-far-right-coup#:~:text=The%20group%20is%20apparently%20part,appears%20to%20have%20taken%20inspiration

WOJCIECHOWSKI, Sebastian – WEJKSZNER, Artur (2025): The New Face of Terrorist Threat in the European Union. Analysis of the EU Terrorism Situation and Trend Report 2024 (TE-SAT) and other sources. Terroryzm, 7(7), 307–326. Online: https://doi.org/10.4467/27204383ter.25.035.21812

Jogi forrás

Regulation (EU) 2021/784 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2021 on addressing the dissemination of terrorist content online

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.