Innovative Methods for Strengthening Road Safety
Approaches from Situational Crime Prevention and Environmental Criminology
Copyright (c) 2026 Krenner József

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Abstract
Introduction: In Hungarian urban settings, the risk of pedestrian-involved injury crashes is largely shaped by junction design, conspicuity conditions and prevailing speed levels. These mechanisms are well described in the literature and in practice, yet a mechanism-based synthesis aligned with policing tools remains incomplete. This article addresses that gap.
Objectives: To present a Hungary-applicable, causally grounded set of interventions to reduce the risk of pedestrian-involved injury crashes.
Methods: Mechanism-oriented narrative review and evidence synthesis, prioritizing European urban before–after evaluations published since 2010. Interventions are grouped into four domains: (1) crossing and junction engineering (cleared sight lines, shorter crossing distances, protected geometries); (2) consistent speed enforcement with emphasis on average-speed enforcement; (3) vehicle technologies – automatic emergency braking with pedestrian detection (AEB) and intelligent speed assistance (ISA); (4) effect detection via before–after analyses using conflict indicators: Time to Collision (TTC) and Post-Encroachment Time (PET).
Results: Protected junction geometries, shortened crossings and direct sight lines reduce conflict frequency and lower prevailing speeds. Optical speed-calming treatments and 30 km/h zones yield sustained downward shifts in speed choice. Transparent, well-signposted and consistent enforcement – particularly average-speed enforcement – suppresses outlier speeds. In-vehicle systems (AEB, ISA) mitigate consequences of common perceptual-interpretive errors. Conflict-indicator-based before–after analyses provide early, unambiguous effect detection.
Conclusion: Coherent signage, self-explaining and self-enforcing design, together with consistent enforcement, act jointly to lower pedestrian-involved crash risk. Impact stems from the site-specific, consistently applied combination rather than any single device. Further work should expand Hungarian before–after studies based on conflict indicators.
Keywords:
How to Cite
References
BRANION-CALLES, Michael – NELSON, Trisalyn – WINTERS, Meghan (2017): Comparing Crowdsourced Near-Miss and Collision Cycling Data and Official Bike Safety Reporting. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2662(1), 1–11. Online: https://doi.org/10.3141/2662-01
Cerema (2021): Evaluation of Three-Dimensional Pedestrian Crossing Trials. Bron. Online: https://www.cerema.fr/system/files/documents/2021/10/evaluation_of_three-dimensional_pedestrian_crossing_trials.pdf
CIALDINI, Robert B. – RENO, Raymond R. – KALLGREN, Carl A. (1990): A Focus Theory of Normative Conduct: Recycling the Concept of Norms to Reduce Littering in Public Places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(6), 1015–1026. Online: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.1015
CICCHINO, Jessica B. (2017): Effectiveness of Forward Collision Warning and Autonomous Emergency Braking Systems in Reducing Front-To-Rear Crash Rates. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 99 (Part A), 142–152. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2016.11.009
COHEN, Lawrence E. – FELSON, Marcus (1979): Social Change and Crime Rate Trends: A Routine Activity Approach. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 588–608. Online: https://doi.org/10.2307/2094589
Criminal Code of Finland (39/1889, as amended, Chapter 2a § 1–3): Fines and Summary Penal Fees. Helsinki: Finlex Data Bank, Ministry of Justice. Online: https://www.finlex.fi/api/media/statute-foreign-language-translation/689270/mainPdf/main.pdf?timestamp=1889-12-18T22%3A20%3A11.000Z
Dirección General de Tráfico – Federación Española de Municipios y Provincias (2021): Nuevos límites de velocidad en vías urbanas y travesías. Manual para políticas municipales. Madrid. Online: https://www.lamoncloa.gob.es/serviciosdeprensa/notasprensa/interior/Documents/2021/130421-Manual_reducci%C3%B3n_30_urbano_DGT_FEMP.pdf
ELVIK, Rune (2001): Area-Wide Urban Traffic Calming Schemes: A Meta-Analysis of Safety Effects. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 33(3), 327–336. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0001-4575(00)00046-4
European Commission (2023): Road Safety in the European Union: Trends, Statistics and Main Challenges 2023. Brussels: European Commission. Online: https://transport.ec.europa.eu/background/road-safety-statistics-2023_en
European Commission (2024): Mandatory driver-assistance systems expected to help save over 25,000 lives by 2038. Brussels: European Commission. Online: https://single-market-economy.ec.europa.eu/news/mandatory-drivers-assistance-systems-expected-help-save-over-25000-lives-2038-2024-07-05_en
European Road Safety Charter (2022): Intelligent Speed Assistance (ISA) Set to Become Mandatory Across Europe. Brussels: European Commission. Online: https://road-safety-charter.ec.europa.eu/resources-knowledge/media-and-press/intelligent-speed-assistance-isa-set-become-mandatory-across
European Road Safety Observatory (2021): Road Safety Thematic Report – Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS). Brussels: European Commission. Online: https://road-safety.transport.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2022-04/Road_Safety_Thematic_Report_ADAS_2021.pdf
European Transport Safety Council (2022): How Traffic Law Enforcement Can Contribute to Safer Roads. PIN Flash Report 42. Brussels: ETSC. Online: https://etsc.eu/wp-content/uploads/ETSC_PINFLASH42_v2TH_JC_FINAL_corrected-060522.pdf
European Union (2010): Directive 2010/40/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 July 2010 on the Framework for the Deployment of Intelligent Transport Systems in the Field of Road Transport and for Interfaces With Other Modes of Transport. Online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2010/40/oj/eng
European Union (2015): Regulation (EU) 2015/758 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2015 On the Type-Approval Requirements for the Deployment of the Ecall In-Vehicle System Based on the 112 Service. Online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32015R0758
European Union (2019): Regulation (EU) 2019/2144 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 November 2019 on Type-Approval Requirements for Motor Vehicles and Their Trailers… Online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:02019R2144-20240707
Federal Highway Administration (2010): Crosswalk Marking Field Visibility Study (FHWA-HRT-10-067, TechBrief). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. Online: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/safety/pedbike/10067/10067.pdf
Federal Highway Administration (2013): Measures of Effectiveness and Validation Guidance for Adaptive Signal Control Technologies (FHWA-HOP-13-031). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. Online: https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/fhwahop13031/fhwahop13031.pdf
Federal Highway Administration (2015): Evaluation of Dynamic Speed Feedback Signs on Curves: A National Demonstration Project, U.S. Washington, D.C.: Department of Transportation. Online: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/safety/14020/14020.pdf
Federal Highway Administration (2017): Open Source Surrogate Safety Assessment Model, 2017 Enhancement and Update: SSAM Version 3.0. Publication No. FHWA-HRT-17-027. Washington, DC: FHWA. Online: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/operations/17027/index.cfm
Federal Highway Administration (2018a): Guide for Improving Pedestrian Safety at Uncontrolled Crossing Locations. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. Online: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/innovation/everydaycounts/edc_5/docs/STEP-guide-improving-ped-safety.pdf
Federal Highway Administration (2018b): Safety Evaluation of Protected Left-Turn Phasing and Leading Pedestrian Intervals on Pedestrian Safety (FHWA-HRT-18-044). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. Online: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/safety/18044/18044.pdf
Federal Highway Administration (2020a): Automated Traffic Signal Performance Measures (FHWA-HOP-20-002). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. Online: https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/fhwahop20002/fhwahop20002.pdf
Federal Highway Administration (2021): A Safe System-Based Framework and Analytical Methodology for Assessing Intersections. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Transportation. Online: https://highways.dot.gov/sites/fhwa.dot.gov/files/2022-06/fhwasa21008.pdf
Federal Highway Administration (2023): Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways, 11th Edition – Part 3 (Markings). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. Online: https://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/pdfs/11th_Edition/part3.pdf
GETTMAN, Douglas et al. (2008): Surrogate Safety Assessment Model and Validation: Final Report. FHWA-HRT-08-051. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration. Online: https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/39210
HALLMARK, Shauna L. – KNICKERBOCKER, Skylar – HAWKINS, Neal (2013): Transverse Speed Bars for Rural Traffic Calming. Ames (IA). Center for Transportation Research and Education Iowa State University. Online: https://www.intrans.iastate.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/updated_transverse_bars_tech_brief.pdf
HØYE, Alena (2014): Speed Cameras, Section Control, and Kangaroo Jumps – A Meta-Analysis. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 73, 200–208. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2014.09.001
International Transport Forum (2021): Artificial Intelligence in Proactive Road Infrastructure Safety Management. Paris: OECD/ITF. Online: https://www.itf-oecd.org/sites/default/files/docs/artificial-intelligence-road-infrastructure-safety-management.pdf
IRK Ferenc (2015): Viktimológia, közösségi és szituációs bűnmegelőzés. Belügyi Szemle, 63(4), 5–20. Online: https://doi.org/10.38146/BSZ.2015.4.1
KRENNER József – SZABÓ Csaba (2023): A közlekedésbiztonság finn modelljének elemző bemutatása. Belügyi Szemle, 71(12), 2253–2264. Online: https://doi.org/10.38146/BSZ.2023.12.8
LEWIS, Ioni M. – WATSON, Barry – WHITE, Katherine M. (2008): An Examination of Message-Relevant Affect in Road Safety Messages: Should Road Safety Advertisements Aim to Make Us Feel Good or Bad? Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 11(6), 403–417. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2008.03.003
MAGYARI Zsófia (2018): Közlekedési csomópontok láthatósági nehézségei és a balesetek összefüggései. Műszaki Katonai Közlöny, 28(1), 49–59. Online: https://mkk.uni-nke.hu/document/mkk-uni-nke-hu/2018_1_05_mkk_csomopontok%20lathatosaga_MZS.pdf
MAJOR Róbert (2009): A közúti közlekedési balesetek megelőzése, különös tekintettel a rendőrség lehetőségeire és korlátaira. PhD-disszertáció. Pécsi Tudományegyetem ÁJK Doktori Iskola. Online: https://ajk.pte.hu/sites/ajk.pte.hu/files/file/doktori-iskola/major-robert/major-robert-vedes-ertekezes.pdf
MEKONNEN, Anteneh Afework – SIPOS, Tibor – KRIZSIK, Nóra (2023): Identifying Hazardous Crash Locations Using Empirical Bayes and Spatial Autocorrelation. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 12(3), 85, 1–17. Online: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi12030085
MEYER, Eric (2004): Evaluation of Data From Test Application of Optical Speed Bars to Highway Work Zones. Lawrence (KS): University of Kansas – The Kansas Department of Transportation. Online: https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/5512
National Association of City Transportation Officials (2023): Urban Street Design Guide. New York: NACTO. Online: https://nacto.org/publication/urban-street-design-guide/
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (2023): 2021 Data: Speeding. Report No. DOT HS 813 473. U.S. Washington, D.C.: Department of Transportation. Online: https://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api/Public/ViewPublication/813473.pdf
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development – International Transport Forum (2016): Zero Road Deaths and Serious Injuries: Leading a Paradigm Shift to a Safe System. Paris: OECD Publishing. Online: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789282108055-en
Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents (2023): Road Safety Factsheet: 20mph Zones and Speed Limits. Birmingham. Online: https://www.rospa.com/siteassets/documents/active-travel/20mph-zones-and-speed-limits-factsheet-2023.pdf
STEVANOVIC, Aleksandar (2010): Adaptive Traffic Control Systems: Domestic and Foreign State of Practice. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board National Academies (NCHRP Synthesis 403). Online: https://doi.org/10.17226/14364
TANNENBAUM, Melanie B. et al. (2015): Appealing to Fear: A Meta-Analysis of Fear Appeal Effectiveness and Theories. Psychological Bulletin, 141(6), 1178–1204. Online: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039729
THALER, Richard H. – SUNSTEIN, Cass R. (2008): Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New Haven–London: Yale University Press.
Transport for London (2018): Direct Vision Standard – London’s Experience. London. Online: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/cmsdata/157804/TfL%20EP%20Direct%20Vision%20v1.pdf
VADEBY, Anna (2016): Traffic Safety Effects of Narrow 2+1 Roads With Median Barrier in Sweden. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Road Safety on Five Continents (Rio de Janeiro), 1–11. Online: https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:920845/FULLTEXT01.pdf
WEGMAN, Fred – AARTS, Letty – VAN DER KNAAP, Peter (2023): Sustainable Safety: A Short History of a Safe System Approach in the Netherlands. In BJÖRNBERG KARIN, Edvardsson et al. (szerk.): The Vision Zero Handbook. Cham: Springer, 307–336. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76505-7_12
WILSON, Cecilia et al. (2010): Speed cameras for the prevention of road traffic injuries and deaths. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (11), CD004607. Online: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004607.pub3
World Bank – Global Road Safety Facility (2021): Guide for Road Safety Interventions: Evidence of What Works and What Does Not Work. Washington, DC: World Bank. Online: https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/206691614060311799/pdf/Guide-for-Road-Safety-Interventions-Evidence-of-What-Works-and-What-Does-Not-Work.pdf
World Health Organization (2023): Global status report on road safety 2023. Geneva: World Health Organization. Online: https://www.transport-community.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Global-status-report-on-road-safety-2023.pdf