Attitudes of Police Chiefs towards Reciprocity of Surveillance (Sousveillance, Citizen Journalism and Police Cameras)
Copyright (c) 2022 Héder Klára
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Abstract
In the digitised world of the 21st century, ‘surveillance society’ has made the hitherto sharply drawn lines between observer and observed increasingly blurred. Modern technologies have expanded the possibilities for digital data collection and picture taking. Since the 1990’s new information technology, options have become available to a wider audience as recording devices have become cheaper, more efficient, and easier to use by the year. The use of video-sharing sites has also become commonplace. These factors have significantly increased the number of pictures taken and newsworthy recordings, as well as their importance. As the case of George Floyd and Kyle Rittenhouse demonstrates, bystanders recording police actions and the widespread sharing of such recordings (citizen journalism) can even play a significant role in shaping public opinion. This paper presents the professional and private views expressed by interviewees on various issues relating to image taking, surveillance, and content sharing, with a special focus on the attitudes of police chiefs towards body-worn cameras and in-car cameras, based on semi-structured interviews.
Keywords:
How to Cite
References
Andersson, Kjell: Transparency and Accountability in Science and Politics. New York, Palgrave Macmillan, 2008. Online: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230227767
Borsi Gergely: Így üldözték és kapták el a rendőrök a debreceni ékszertolvajokat. Index, 2022. január 27. Online: https://index.hu/belfold/2022/01/27/igy-uldoztek-es-kaptak-el-a-rendorok-a-debreceni-ekszertolvajokat/
Brucato, Ben: Policing Made Visible: Mobile Technologies and the Importance of Point of View. Surveillance & Society, 13. (2015a), 3–4. 455–473. Online: https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v13i3/4.5421
Brucato, Ben: The New Transparency: Police Violence in the Context of Ubiquitous Surveillance. Media and Communication, 3. (2015b), 3. 39–55. Online: https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v3i3.292
Farmer, Ashley K. – Ivan Y. Sun: Citizen Journalism and Police Legitimacy: Does Recording the Police Make a Difference? In The Politics of Policing: Between Force and Legitimacy. Bingley, Emerald, 2016. 239–256. Online: https://doi.org/10.1108/S1521-613620160000021013
Goldsmith, Andrew John: Policing’s New Visibility. British Journal of Criminology, 50. (2015), 5. 914–934. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azq033
Haggerty, Kevin D.: Surveillance, Crime and the Police. In Kirstie Ball – Kevin D. Haggerty – David Lyon (szerk.): Routledge Handbook of Surveillance Studies. London, Routledge, 2012. 235–243. Online: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203814949.ch3_2_b
Haggerty, Kevin D. – Richard Ericson: The Surveillant Assemblage. British Journal of Sociology, 51. (2000), 4. 605–622. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/00071310020015280
Haggerty, Kevin D. – Ajay Sandhu: Policing’s Crisis of Visibility. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 33. (2014), 2. 9–12. Online: https://doi.org/10.1109/MTS.2014.2319912
Iván-Nagy Szilvia: Legalább egy tucatnyi rendőrautó üldözte Budapesten a száguldozó 16 évest, aki nekiment két rendőrautónak, és egy rendőrt is elsodort. Telex, 2022. január 28. Online: https://telex.hu/belfold/2022/01/28/uldozes-v-kerulet-xvii-kerulet-serules-sofor
Kies, Marianne: Policing the Police: Freedom of the Press, the Right to Privacy, and Civilian Recordings of Police Activity. The George Washington Law Review, 80. (2011), 1. 274–310. Online: http://www.gwlr.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/80-Geo.-Wash.-L.-Rev.-274.pdf
Lyon, David: The Electronic Eye: The Rise of Surveillance Society – Computers and Social Control in Context. Cambridge, Polity, 1994a.
Lyon, David: The Electronic Eye: The Rise of Surveillance Society. Cambridge, Polity, 1994b.
Lyon, David: Surveillance Studies: Understanding Visibility, Mobility and the Phenetic Fix. Surveillance & Society, 1. (2002), 1. 1–7. Online: https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v1i1.3390
Lyon, David: Surveillance after September 11. Cambridge, Polity, 2003.
Mann, Steve – Jason Nolan – Barry Wellman: Sousveillance: Inventing and Using Wearable Computing Devices for Data Collection in Surveillance Environments. Surveillance & Society, 1. (2003), 3. 331–355. Online: https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v1i3.3344
Marx, Gary T.: Technology and Social Control. In James D. Wright (szerk.): International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. Amsterdam, Elsevier, 2015. 117–124. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.85052-7
Marx, Gary T.: The Ayes Have It – Should They? Police Body-Worn Cameras. In Bryce Clayton Newell (szerk.): Police on Camera: Surveillance, Privacy, and Accountability. Routledge, 2020. 7–25. Online: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429439759-1
McCahill, Michael: Crime, Surveillance and Media. In Kirstie Ball – Kevin D. Haggerty – David Lyon (szerk.): Routledge Handbook of Surveillance Studies. London, Routledge, 2012. 244–250. Online: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203814949.ch3_2_b
Miller, Serena: Citizen journalism. In Jon Nussbaum (szerk.): Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication. New York, Oxford University Press, 2019. 1–25. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.786
Monahan, Torin: Counter-Surveillance as Political Intervention? Social Semiotics, 16. (2006), 4. 515–534. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330601019769
Monahan, Torin: Surveillance as Governance: Social Inequality and the Pursuit of Democratic Surveillance. In Kevin D. Haggerty – Minas Samatas (szerk.): Surveillance and Democracy. London, Routledge-Cavendish, 2010. 91–110. Online: https://publicsurveillance.com/papers/Surveillance-as-Governance.pdf
Örnebring, Henrik: Anything You Can Do, I Can Do Better? Professional Journalists on Citizen Journalism in Six European Countries. International Communication Gazette, 75. (2013), 1. 35–53. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048512461761
Sandhu, Ajay: ‘I’m Glad That Was on Camera’: A Case Study of Police Officers’ Perceptions of Cameras. Policing and Society, 29. (2017), 2. 223–235. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2017.1285917
Schaefer, Brian P. – Kevin F. Steinmetz: Watching the Watchers and McLuhan’s Tetrad: The Limits of Cop-Watching in the Internet Age. Surveillance & Society, 12. (2014), 4. 502–515. Online: https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v12i4.5028
Skinner-Thompson, Scott: Recording as Heckling. Georgetown Law Journal, 108. (2019), 1. 125–174. Online: https://www.law.georgetown.edu/georgetown-law-journal/wp-content/uploads/sites/26/2019/11/Recording-as-Heckling.pdf
Thompson, John: The New Visibility. Theory, Culture & Society, 22. (2005), 6. 31–51. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276405059413
Whitson, Jennifer R.: Surveillance and Democracy in the Digital Enclosure. In Kevin D. Haggerty – Minas Samatas (szerk.): Surveillance and Democracy. London, Routledge-Cavendish, 2010. 231–246. Online: http://web.mit.edu/comm-forum/legacy/mit6/papers/Whitson.pdf
Wilson, Dean – Tanya Serisier: Video Activism and the Ambiguities of Counter-Surveillance. Surveillance & Society, 8. (2010), 2. 166–180. Online: https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v8i2.3484