Attitudes of Police Chiefs towards Reciprocity of Surveillance (Sousveillance, Citizen Journalism and Police Cameras)

  • Héder Klára
doi: 10.32577/mr.2022.2.8

Abstract

In the digitised world of the 21st century, ‘surveillance society’ has made the hitherto sharply drawn lines between observer and observed increasingly blurred. Modern technologies have expanded the possibilities for digital data collection and picture taking. Since the 1990’s new information technology, options have become available to a wider audience as recording devices have become cheaper, more efficient, and easier to use by the year. The use of video-sharing sites has also become commonplace. These factors have significantly increased the number of pictures taken and newsworthy recordings, as well as their importance. As the case of George Floyd and Kyle Rittenhouse demonstrates, bystanders recording police actions and the widespread sharing of such recordings  (citizen journalism) can even play a significant role in shaping public opinion. This paper presents the professional and private views expressed by interviewees on various issues relating to image taking, surveillance, and content sharing, with a special focus on the attitudes of police chiefs towards body-worn cameras and in-car cameras, based on semi-structured interviews.

Keywords:

information society surveillance citizen journalism body-worn cameras

How to Cite

Héder, K. (2022). Attitudes of Police Chiefs towards Reciprocity of Surveillance (Sousveillance, Citizen Journalism and Police Cameras). Hungarian Law Enforcement, 22(2), 121–139. https://doi.org/10.32577/mr.2022.2.8

References

Andersson, Kjell: Transparency and Accountability in Science and Politics. New York, Palgrave Macmillan, 2008. Online: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230227767

Borsi Gergely: Így üldözték és kapták el a rendőrök a debreceni ékszertolvajokat. Index, 2022. január 27. Online: https://index.hu/belfold/2022/01/27/igy-uldoztek-es-kaptak-el-a-rendorok-a-debreceni-ekszertolvajokat/

Brucato, Ben: Policing Made Visible: Mobile Technologies and the Importance of Point of View. Surveillance & Society, 13. (2015a), 3–4. 455–473. Online: https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v13i3/4.5421

Brucato, Ben: The New Transparency: Police Violence in the Context of Ubiquitous Surveillance. Media and Communication, 3. (2015b), 3. 39–55. Online: https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v3i3.292

Farmer, Ashley K. – Ivan Y. Sun: Citizen Journalism and Police Legitimacy: Does Recording the Police Make a Difference? In The Politics of Policing: Between Force and Legitimacy. Bingley, Emerald, 2016. 239–256. Online: https://doi.org/10.1108/S1521-613620160000021013

Goldsmith, Andrew John: Policing’s New Visibility. British Journal of Criminology, 50. (2015), 5. 914–934. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azq033

Haggerty, Kevin D.: Surveillance, Crime and the Police. In Kirstie Ball – Kevin D. Haggerty – David Lyon (szerk.): Routledge Handbook of Surveillance Studies. London, Routledge, 2012. 235–243. Online: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203814949.ch3_2_b

Haggerty, Kevin D. – Richard Ericson: The Surveillant Assemblage. British Journal of Sociology, 51. (2000), 4. 605–622. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/00071310020015280

Haggerty, Kevin D. – Ajay Sandhu: Policing’s Crisis of Visibility. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 33. (2014), 2. 9–12. Online: https://doi.org/10.1109/MTS.2014.2319912

Iván-Nagy Szilvia: Legalább egy tucatnyi rendőrautó üldözte Budapesten a száguldozó 16 évest, aki nekiment két rendőrautónak, és egy rendőrt is elsodort. Telex, 2022. január 28. Online: https://telex.hu/belfold/2022/01/28/uldozes-v-kerulet-xvii-kerulet-serules-sofor

Kies, Marianne: Policing the Police: Freedom of the Press, the Right to Privacy, and Civilian Recordings of Police Activity. The George Washington Law Review, 80. (2011), 1. 274–310. Online: http://www.gwlr.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/80-Geo.-Wash.-L.-Rev.-274.pdf

Lyon, David: The Electronic Eye: The Rise of Surveillance Society – Computers and Social Control in Context. Cambridge, Polity, 1994a.

Lyon, David: The Electronic Eye: The Rise of Surveillance Society. Cambridge, Polity, 1994b.

Lyon, David: Surveillance Studies: Understanding Visibility, Mobility and the Phenetic Fix. Surveillance & Society, 1. (2002), 1. 1–7. Online: https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v1i1.3390

Lyon, David: Surveillance after September 11. Cambridge, Polity, 2003.

Mann, Steve – Jason Nolan – Barry Wellman: Sousveillance: Inventing and Using Wearable Computing Devices for Data Collection in Surveillance Environments. Surveillance & Society, 1. (2003), 3. 331–355. Online: https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v1i3.3344

Marx, Gary T.: Technology and Social Control. In James D. Wright (szerk.): International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. Amsterdam, Elsevier, 2015. 117–124. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.85052-7

Marx, Gary T.: The Ayes Have It – Should They? Police Body-Worn Cameras. In Bryce Clayton Newell (szerk.): Police on Camera: Surveillance, Privacy, and Accountability. Routledge, 2020. 7–25. Online: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429439759-1

McCahill, Michael: Crime, Surveillance and Media. In Kirstie Ball – Kevin D. Haggerty – David Lyon (szerk.): Routledge Handbook of Surveillance Studies. London, Routledge, 2012. 244–250. Online: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203814949.ch3_2_b

Miller, Serena: Citizen journalism. In Jon Nussbaum (szerk.): Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication. New York, Oxford University Press, 2019. 1–25. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.786

Monahan, Torin: Counter-Surveillance as Political Intervention? Social Semiotics, 16. (2006), 4. 515–534. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330601019769

Monahan, Torin: Surveillance as Governance: Social Inequality and the Pursuit of Democratic Surveillance. In Kevin D. Haggerty – Minas Samatas (szerk.): Surveillance and Democracy. London, Routledge-Cavendish, 2010. 91–110. Online: https://publicsurveillance.com/papers/Surveillance-as-Governance.pdf

Örnebring, Henrik: Anything You Can Do, I Can Do Better? Professional Journalists on Citizen Journalism in Six European Countries. International Communication Gazette, 75. (2013), 1. 35–53. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048512461761

Sandhu, Ajay: ‘I’m Glad That Was on Camera’: A Case Study of Police Officers’ Perceptions of Cameras. Policing and Society, 29. (2017), 2. 223–235. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2017.1285917

Schaefer, Brian P. – Kevin F. Steinmetz: Watching the Watchers and McLuhan’s Tetrad: The Limits of Cop-Watching in the Internet Age. Surveillance & Society, 12. (2014), 4. 502–515. Online: https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v12i4.5028

Skinner-Thompson, Scott: Recording as Heckling. Georgetown Law Journal, 108. (2019), 1. 125–174. Online: https://www.law.georgetown.edu/georgetown-law-journal/wp-content/uploads/sites/26/2019/11/Recording-as-Heckling.pdf

Thompson, John: The New Visibility. Theory, Culture & Society, 22. (2005), 6. 31–51. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276405059413

Whitson, Jennifer R.: Surveillance and Democracy in the Digital Enclosure. In Kevin D. Haggerty – Minas Samatas (szerk.): Surveillance and Democracy. London, Routledge-Cavendish, 2010. 231–246. Online: http://web.mit.edu/comm-forum/legacy/mit6/papers/Whitson.pdf

Wilson, Dean – Tanya Serisier: Video Activism and the Ambiguities of Counter-Surveillance. Surveillance & Society, 8. (2010), 2. 166–180. Online: https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v8i2.3484

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.