Trust, Risk and Public Willingness to Cooperate with the Police
Evidence from a Mixed-Methods Study
Absztrakt
Objective: Previous research into public trust in the police has focused on cooperativeness as an outcome massively influenced by trust. Nevertheless, our understanding of the relationship between different types of trust and citizens’ propensity to support policing remains insufficient, especially regarding personal risk. This study examines how perceptions of the police as fair, effective and community-oriented organisation influence cooperation. It also explores whether trust remains a predictor in instances where assistance involves higher personal or social costs.
Methodology: A mixed-methods approach was used, including a survey of 319 residents, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and structural equation modelling (SEM), and follow-up focus groups to identify the barriers residents encountered when trying to collaborate in situations involving heightened risk. EFA is a method of uncovering hidden patterns in people’s responses. When a questionnaire contains many items, the answers often cluster together in meaningful ways. EFA identifies these clusters and shows which items belong to the same underlying concept. Structural equation modelling (SEM) shows how different concepts are connected, which concepts lead to specific outcomes, and how strong each connection is. The quantitative analysis found three dimensions of trust: procedural justice, distributive justice and police effectiveness, alongside community commitment. Cooperation proved to be a two-factor structure consisting of obedience and voluntary assistance to the police.
Findings: Trust was only a significant predictor of cooperative behaviour in low-risk situations involving minor incidents or transgressions, and where little personal vulnerability was evident. Willingness to report violations of more serious rules (assaults, drug sales or corruption) did not scale similarly with trust. Common barriers related to fear of reprisal, lack of trust in the system and possible social or professional consequences were supported by qualitative data.
Value: This research demonstrates that trust can promote cooperation, but only when individuals do not feel personally vulnerable. It highlights the need for contemporary campaigns that promote secure, responsible institutional environments to increase public participation.
Kulcsszavak:
Hogyan kell idézni
Hivatkozások
ADAMS, Barbara D. – WEBB, Robert D. G. (2003): Trust Development in Small Teams. Report No. CR-2003-016. Toronto: Defence Research and Development Canada. Online: https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA630676.pdf
ADAMS, Richard E. – ROHE, William M. – ARCURY, Thomas A. (2002): Implementing Community-oriented Policing: Organizational Change and Street Officer Attitudes. Crime and Delinquency, 48(3), 399–430. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128702048003003
ALA-LUOPA, Saara (2022): What Is Trust, Actually? Review on the Discussion Regarding Trust in Technology and in AI. Online: https://projects.tuni.fi/app/uploads/2023/02/bfa1f61a-trust-in-ai_review-2.pdf
BARTON, Harry – BEYNON, Malcom J. (2015): Do the Citizens of Europe Trust Their Police? International Journal of Emergency Services, 4(1), 65–85. Online: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJES-09-2014-0013
BEKMAMEDOVA, Nargiza – PRANANTO, Adi – MCKAY, Judy – VOROBIEV, Artem (2008): Towards a Conceptualisation of Trust in IS Outsourcing. International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS) – ICIS 2008 Proceedings. Online: https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2008/152/
BELLO, Paul O. (2025): University Students’ Accounts of Police Use of Force: Implications for Trust in the Police. African Identities, 23(3), 634–652. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/14725843.2024.2308639
BELLO, Paul O. – JOHN-LANGBA, Johannes (2020): University Students and Police Legitimacy: The South African Police Service before the Loudspeaker. International Journal of Business and Management Studies, 12(2), 306–320.
BODA, Zsolt – MEDGYESI, Márton – FONDEVILLE, Nicole – ÖZDEMIR, Erhan (2018): Societal Change and Trust in Institutions. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Online: https://doi.org/10.2806/736845
BRODEUR, Jean-Paul (2017): Trust and Expertise in Policing. In NOGALA, Detlef – FEHÉRVÁRY, János – JASCHKE, Hans-Gerd – DEN BOER, Monica (eds): European Police Science and Research Bulletin. Police Science and Police Practice in Europe. European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Training (CEPOL), 105–120. Online: https://www.cepol.europa.eu/sites/default/files/Special%20Conference%20Edition%20Nr.%202.pdf
BÜSSING, André (2002): Trust and Its Relations to Commitment and Involvement in Work and Organisations. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 28(4), 36–42. Online: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v28i4.77
BUZAROVSKA, Gordana – BACHANOVIC, Oliver – KALAJDZIEV, Gordan – DRAKULEVSKI, Aleksandra Gruevska – Misoski, Boban – GOGOV, Bogdancho – ILIC, Divna – JOVANOVA, Natasa (2014): Students’ Views on the Police in the Republic of Macedonia. Varstvoslovje, Journal of Criminal Justice and Security, 16(4), 435–452.
CAO, Liqun – STACK, Steven – SUN, Yi (1998): Public Attitudes toward the Police: A Comparative Study between Japan and America. Journal of Criminal Justice, 26(4), 279–289. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2352(98)00015-4
CLAYMAN, Stephen – SKINNS, Layla (2012): To Snitch or Not to Snitch? An Exploratory Study of the Factors Influencing Whether Young People Actively Cooperate with the Police. Policing and Society, 22(4), 460–480. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2011.641550
CORDNER, Gary (2010): Reducing Fear of Crime. Strategies for Police. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services. Online: https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/reducing-fear-crime-strategies-police
DELHEY, Jan – NEWTON, Kenneth (2005): Predicting Cross-national Levels of Social Trust: Global Pattern or Nordic Exceptionalism? European Sociological Review, 21(4), 311–327. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jci022
FYFE, Nicholas – SHEPTYCKI, James (2005): Facilitating Witness Co-operation in Organised Crime Cases: An International Review. London: Home Office. Online: https://popcenter.asu.edu/sites/g/files/litvpz3631/files/problems/witness_intimidation/PDFs/Fyfe&Sheptycki_2005.pdf
FLEMING, Jenny – MCLAUGHLIN, Eugene (2010): ‘The Public Gets What the Public Wants?’ Interrogating the ‘Public Confidence’ Agenda. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 4(3), 199–202. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/police/paq024
VAN DER GIESSEN, Mark – BREIN, Elisabeth – JACOBS, Gabriele (2017): Community Policing: The Relevance of Social Contexts. In BAYERL, Saskia P. – KARLOVIĆ, Ruža – AKHGAR, Babak – MARKARIAN, Garik (eds.): Community Policing – A European Perspective. Strategies, Best Practices and Guidelines. Cham: Springer, 35–50. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53396-4_4
GOLDSMITH, Andrew (2005): Police Reform and the Problem of Trust. Theoretical Criminology, 9(4), 443–470. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480605057727
HAIR, Joseph F. – BLACK, William C. – BABIN, Barry J. – ANDERSON, Rolph E. (2009): Multivariate Data Analysis. Hoboken: Pearson.
HAYNES, Stacy H. – LEONE, Matthew C. – KEENA, Linda D. – MAY, David C. – RICCIARDELLI, Rosemary – LAMBERT, Eric G. (2020): The Association between Different Forms of Organizational Trust and Correctional Staff Job Stress. Journal of Crime and Justice, 43(5), 623–639. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2020.1734056
HERMERÉN, Göran (2017): Trust and Mistrust of Science. In Trust at Risk: Implications for EU Policies and Institutions. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 31–47. Online: https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/364327
HÖPPNER, Corina (2009): Trust: A Monolithic Panacea in Land Use Planning? Land Use Policy, 26(4), 1046–1054. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.12.007
JACKSON, Jonathan – BRADFORD, Ben – HOUGH, Mike – MYHILL, Andy – QUINTON, Paul – TYLER, Tom R. (2012): Why Do People Comply with the Law? Legitimacy and the Influence of Legal Institutions. The British Journal of Criminology, 52(6), 1051–1071. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azs032
JACKSON, Jonathan – BRADFORD, Ben (2010): What Is Trust and Confidence in the Police? Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 4(3), 241–248. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/police/paq020
KÄÄRIÄINEN, J. (2008): Why Do the Finns Trust the Police? Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention, 9(2), 141–159. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/14043850802450294
KAPPMEIER, Mariska – GUENOUN, Bushra – FAHEY, Kathryn H. (2021): Conceptualizing Trust between Groups: An Empirical Validation of the Five-dimensional Intergroup Trust Model. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 27(1), 90–95. Online: https://doi.org/10.1037/pac0000537
KESER, Claudia (2003): Experimental Games for the Design of Reputation Management Systems. IBM Systems Journal, 42(3), 498–506. Online: https://doi.org/10.1147/sj.423.0498
KHODYAKOV, Dmitry (2007): Trust as a Process: A Three-dimensional Approach. Sociology, 41(1), 115–132. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038507072285
KIRMIZIDAĞ, Nur (2015): Research on Public Trust in the Police in Turkey. Turkish Economic and Social Studies Foundation. Online:https://www.tesev.org.tr/wp-content/uploads/report_Research_On_Public_Trust_In_The_Police_In_Turkey.pdf
LEE, Michael A. – ALARCON, Gene M. – CAPIOLA, August (2022): I Think You Are Trustworthy, Need I Say More? The Factor Structure and Practicalities of Trustworthiness Assessment. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. Online: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.797443
LEWICKI, Roy J. – BRINSFIELD, Chad (2012): Measuring Trust Beliefs and Behaviours. In LYON, Fergus – MÖLLERING, Guido – SAUNDERS, Mark N. K. (eds.): Handbook of Research Methods on Trust. Cheltenham–Northampton: Edward Elgar, 29–39.
LEWICKI, Roy J. – MCALLISTER, Daniel J. – BIES, Robert J. (1998): Trust and Distrust: New Relationships and Realities. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 438–458. Online: https://doi.org/10.2307/259288
MAYER, Roger C. – DAVIS, James H. – SCHOORMAN, David F. (1995): An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734. Online: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335
MBEWU, Ithandile – OBIOHA, Emeka E. – MUGARI, Ishmael (2021): Encouraging and Discouraging Factors to Crime Reporting in South Africa: A Survey of Residents’ Crime Reporting Behaviour in Mthatha South Africa Police Service Precinct. Cogent Social Sciences, 7(1). Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2021.2002542
MCEVILY, Bill – TORTORIELLO, Marco (2011): Measuring Trust in Organisational Research: Review and Recommendations. Journal of Trust Research, 1(1), 23–63. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2011.552424
MEŠKO, Gorazd – REISIG, Michael – TANKEBE, Justice (2012): Postopkovna pravičnost, legitimnost policije in sodelovanje javnosti s pravosodnimi organi. Revija za kriminalistiko in kriminologijo, 63(2), 112–122.
MILLIE, Andrew – BULLOCK, Karen (2012): Re-imagining Policing Post-austerity. British Academy Review, 19(1), 16–18.
MORRONE, Adolfo – TONTORANELLI, Noemi – RANUZZI, Giulia (2009): How Good Is Trust? Measuring Trust and Its Role for the Progress of Societies. OECD Statistics Working Papers, (3). Online: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/220633873086
MOUHANNA, Christian (2017): Colliding Views of Police Reality: Science vs. Politics of Policing. In NOGALA, Detlef – FEHÉRVÁRY, János – JASCHKE, Hans-Gerd – DEN BOER, Monica (eds.): European Police Science and Research Bulletin. Police Science and Police Practice in Europe. European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Training (CEPOL), 27–34. Online: https://www.cepol.europa.eu/sites/default/files/Special%20Conference%20Edition%20Nr.%202.pdf
MURPHY, Kristina – MAZEROLLE, Lorraine – BENNETT, Sarah (2014): Promoting Trust in Police: Findings from a Randomised Experimental Field Trial of Procedural Justice Policing. Policing and Society, 24(4), 405–424. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2013.862246
MURRAY, John (2005): Policing Terrorism: A Threat to Community Policing or Just a Shift in Priorities? Police Practice and Research, 6(4), 347–361. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/15614260500293986
NEILD, Rachel (1998): Internal Controls and Disciplinary Units. Washington Office on Latin America. Online: https://www.wola.org/sites/default/files/downloadable/Citizen%20Security/past/internal%20controls%20formatted.pdf
NIX, Justine – WOLFE, Scott E. – ROJEK, Jeff – KAMINSKI, Robert J. (2015): Trust in the Police: The Influence of Procedural Justice and Perceived Collective Efficacy. Crime and Delinquency, 61(4), 610–640. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128714530548
PEREZ-VINCENT, Santiago M. – ABRIL, Veronica – CHEN, Cynthia – TAYO, Teniola – URREGO-JIMENEZ, Andres (2024): Crime Underreporting in Latin America and the Caribbean. Online: https://publications.iadb.org/publications/english/document/Crime-Underreporting-in-Latin-America-and-the-Caribbean.pdf
PRYCE, Daniel K. – CHENANE, Joselyne L. (2021): Trust and Confidence in Police Officers and the Institution of Policing: The Views of African Americans in the American South. Crime and Delinquency, 67(6–7), 808–838. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128721991823
PRYCE, Daniel K. – JOHNSON, Devon – MAGUIRE, Edward R. (2017): Procedural Justice, Obligation to Obey, and Cooperation with Police in a Sample of Ghanaian Immigrants. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 44(5), 733–755. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854816680225
PUSCA, Barbara – LANG, Gerhard – KUTSCHERA, Ricarda (2017): Joining Forces for Our Security in Austrian Community Policing. In BAYERL, Saskia P. – KARLOVIĆ, Ruža – AKHGAR, Babak – MARKARIAN, Garik (eds.): Community Policing – A European Perspective. Strategies, Best Practices and Guidelines. Cham: Springer, 111–124. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53396-4_9
REISIG, Michael D. – TANKABE, Justice – MEŠKO, Gorazd (2012): Procedural Justice, Police Legitimacy, and Public Cooperation with the Police among Young Slovene Adults. Varstvoslovje: revija za teorijo in prakso varstvoslovja, 14(2), 147–164.
REN, Ling – CAO, Liqun – LOVRICH, Nicholas – GAFFNEY, Michael (2005): Linking Confidence in the Police with the Performance of the Police: Community Policing Can Make a Difference. Journal of Criminal Justice, 33(1), 55–66. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2004.10.003
ROBBINS, Stephen P. (2001): Organizational Behavior. Hoboken: Prentice Hall.
ROTTER, Julian B. (1980): Interpersonal Trust, Trustworthiness, and Gullibility. American Psychologist, 35(1), 1–7. Online: https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.35.1.1
ROUSSEAU, Denise M. – SITKIN, Sim B. – BURT, Ronald S. – CAMERER, Colin (1998): Not So Different After All: A Cross-discipline View of Trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393–404. Online: https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1998.926617
SCHAAP, Dorian (2020): The Police, the Public, and the Pursuit of Trust. A Cross-national, Dynamic Study of Trust in the Police and Police Trust-building. The Haag: Eleven International Publishing. Online: https://mediatheek.politieacademie.nl/pdf/94746.PDF
SCHULHOFER, Stephen J. – TYLER, Tom R. – HUQ, Aziz Z. (2011): American Policing at a Crossroads: Unsustainable Policies and the Procedural Justice Alternative. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 101(2), 335–375.
SEKHON, Harjit – ENNEW, Christine – KHAROUF, Husni – DEVLIN, James (2014): Trustworthiness and Trust: Influences and Implications. Journal of Marketing Management, 30(3–4), 409–430. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2013.842609
SEPPÄNEN, Risto – BLOMQVIST, Kirsimarja – SUNDQVIST, Sanna (2007): Measuring Inter-organizational Trust – A Critical Review of the Empirical Research in 1990–2003. Industrial Marketing Management, 36(2), 249–265. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2005.09.003
STAUBLI, Silvia (2017): Trusting the Police. Comparisons across Eastern and Western Europe. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag. Online: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839437827
TERPSTRA, Jan (2010): Community Policing in Practice: Ambitions and Realization. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 4(1), 64–72. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/police/pap029
TONRY, Michael (2014): Why Crime Rates Are Falling Throughout the Western World. Crime and Justice, 43(1), 1–63.
TYLER, Tom R. – FAGAN, Jeffrey (2008): Legitimacy and Cooperation: Why Do People Help the Police Fight Crime in Their Communities? Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 6, 231–275.
UCHIDA, Craig D. (2004): The Development of the American Police: An Historical Overview. In DUNHAM, Roger G. – ALPERT, Geoffrey P. (eds): Critical Issues in Policing. Contemporary Readings. Long Grove: Waveland Press, 20–40.
WEHRMAN, Michael. M. – DE ANGELIS, Joseph (2011): Citizen Willingness to Participate in Police–Community Partnerships: Exploring the Influence of Race and Neighborhood Context. Police Quarterly, 14(1), 48–69. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/1098611110393134
WILKINS, Consuelo H. (2018): Effective Engagement Requires Trust and Being Trustworthy. Medical Care, 56(10), S6–S8. Online: https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000000953
WORRALL, John L. (2014): The Politics of Policing. In REISIG, Michael D. – KANE, Robert J. (eds): The Oxford Handbook of Police and Policing. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 49–67.
WU, Yuning – POTEYEVA, Margarita – SUN, Ivan Y. (2012): Trust in Police: A Comparison of China and Taiwan. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 36(3), 189–210. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/01924036.2012.699794
YOON, Seokhee (2015): Why Do Victims Not Report? The Influence of Police and Criminal Justice Cynicism on the Dark Figure of Crime. Online: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2209&context=gc_etds