Research on Improving the Interviewing of Suspects

doi: 10.32577/MR.2025.KSZ.1.6

Absztrakt

This publication overviews some of the author’s involvement regarding international developments in recent decades related to the improving of interviews with suspects. Its aim is to demonstrate how research has been informing policies and practices around the world. In light of psychological research, a growing number of countries/organisations have decided to adopt a model/approach of “investigative interviewing” of suspects that does not rely on coercive or oppressive methods. This article will overview 1. the evolution of the ‘PEACE method’; 2. some of the research on the effectiveness of aspects of the ‘PEACE’ method; and 3. the 2021 publication of the ‘Principles of Effective Interviewing’ (drafted at the request of the United Nations). In 2016, the United Nations “Special Rapporteur on torture and other cruel, inhumane or degrading treatments” (law professor Juan Méndez) submitted his report to the United Nations, which stated that “The Special Rapporteur […] advocates the development of a universal protocol identifying a set of standards for non-coercive interviewing methods and procedural safeguards that ought, as a matter of law and policy, to be applied at a minimum to all interviews by law enforcement officials, military and intelligence personnel and other bodies with investigative mandates.” The current publication here demonstrates that police and other investigative agencies can be willing to update/improve their interviewing of suspects by taking note of the findings of relevant research.

Kulcsszavak:

interrogation methods investigative interviewing non-coercive methods interviewing standards PEACE method LILERS

Hogyan kell idézni

Ray, B. (2025). Research on Improving the Interviewing of Suspects. Magyar Rendészet, 25(Special Issue), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.32577/MR.2025.KSZ.1.6

Hivatkozások

AKCA, Davut – DI DANIELI, Charlene – SHANE, Matthew – EASTWOOD, Joseph (2022): A Test of a Short PEACE Interview Training Course: Training Efficacy and Individual Differences. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 37(1), 183–194. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-021-09487-2

BAKER-ECK, Bianca – BULL, Ray (2022): Effects of Empathy and Question Types on Suspects’ Provision of Information in Investigative Interviews. International Journal of Police Science and Management, 24(4), 406–416. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/14613557221106073

BAKER-ECK, Bianca – BULL, Ray – WALSH, Dave (2021): Investigative Empathy: Five Types of Cognitive Empathy in a Field Study of Investigative Interviews with Suspects of Sexual Offences. Investigative Interviewing: Research and Practice, 11(1), 28–39.

BALDWIN, John (1993): Police Interview Techniques. Establishing Truth or Proof? The British Journal of Criminology, 33(3), 325–352. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjc.a048329

BETTENS, Talley – CLEARY, Hayley M. D. – BULL, Ray (2024): Humane Interrogation Strategies Are Associated with Confessions, Cooperation, and Disclosure: Evidence from a Field Study of Incarcerated Individuals in the United States. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 51(6), 949–969. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/00938548241232068

BULL, Ray (2014): When in Interviews to Disclose Information to Suspects and to Challenge Them? In BULL, Ray (ed.): Investigative Interviewing. New York: Springer, 167–181. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9642-7_9

BULL, Ray (2019): Roar or “PEACE”: Is It a “Tall Story”? In BULL, Ray – BLANDÓN-GITLIN, Iris (eds.): Routledge International Handbook of Legal and Investigative Psychology. London: Routledge, 20–36. Online: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429326530-3

BULL, Ray – BAKER, Bianca (2020): Obtaining Valid Discourse from Suspects “PEACE”-fully: What Role for Rapport and Empathy? In MASON, Marianne – ROCK, Frances (eds.): The Discourse of Police Interviews. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 42–64. Online: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226647821.003.0003

BULL, Ray – CHERRYMAN, Julie (1995): Helping to Identify Skills Gaps in Specialist Investigative Interviewing. London: Home Office Police Research Group.

BULL, Ray – RACHLEW, Asbjørn (2020): Investigative Interviewing: From England to Norway and Beyond. In BARELA, Steven – FALLON, Mark – GAGGIOLI, Gloria – OHLIN, Jens David (eds.): Interrogation and Torture. Research on Efficacy, and Its Integration with Morality and Legality. Oxford – New York: Oxford University Press, 171–196. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190097523.003.0007

CLEARY, Hayley M. D. – BULL, Ray (2021): Contextual Factors Predict Self-reported Confession Decision-making: A Field Study of Suspects’ Actual Police Interrogation Experiences. Law and Human Behavior, 45(4), 310–323. Online: https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000459

DESLAURIERS-VARIN, Nadine – BEAUREGARD, Eric – WONG, Jennifer (2011): Changing Their Mind about Confessing to Police: The Role of Contextual Factors in Crime Confession. Police Quarterly, 14(1), 5–24. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/1098611110392721

HOLMBERG, Ulf – CHRISTIANSON, Sven‐Åke (2002): Murderers’ and Sexual Offenders’ Experiences of Police Interviews and Their Inclination to Admit or Deny Crimes. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 20(1–2), 31–45. Online: https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.470

JONES, Trevor – MACLEAN, Brian – YOUNG, Jock (1986): The Islington Crime Survey. Crime, Victimization and Policing in Inner-city London. Aldershot: Gower.

KEBBELL, Mark – HURREN, Emily – MAZEROLLE, Paul (2006): Sex Offenders’ Perceptions of How They Were Interviewed. Canadian Journal of Police and Security Services, 4, 67–75.

KELLY, Christopher E. – MEEHAN, Nathan – MCCLARY, Michael – JENAWAY, Elizabeth M. (2021): Just a Normal Conversation: Investigative Interviews in a County Jail. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 48(8), 1166–1184. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854821993509

LEAHY-HARLAND, Samantha – BULL, Ray (2017): Police Strategies and Suspect Responses in Real-life Serious Crime Interviews. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 32(2), 138–151. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-016-9207-8

LEO, Richard A. (2009): Police Interrogation and American Justice. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Online: https://doi.org/10.4159/978067403370

MARQUES, Paulo Barbosa – ST-YVES, Michel (2022): Interviewing Psychopaths: Toward a Science of Investigative Interviewing of Psychopathic Suspects. In MARQUES, Paulo Barbosa – PAULINO, Mauro – ALHO, Laura (eds.): Psychopathy and Criminal Behavior. Current Trends and Challenges. Cambridge, Mass.: Academic Press, 219–239. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-811419-3.00045-5

MAY, Lennart – GEWEHR, Elsa – ZIMMERMANN, Johannes – RAIBLE, Yonna – VOLBERT, Renate (2021): How Guilty and Innocent Suspects Perceive the Police and Themselves: Suspect Interviews in Germany. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 26(1), 42–61. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12184

MCCONVILLE, Michael – HODGSON, Jacqueline (1993): Custodial Legal Advice and the Right to Silence. Research Study Number 16. The Royal Commission on Criminal Justice. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.

MÉNDEZ, Juan E. (2016): Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. Note by the Secretary-General. United Nations. Online: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/839995/files/A_71_298-EN.pdf

MILNE, Rebecca – BULL, Ray (1999): Investigative Interviewing. Psychology and Practice. Chichester: Wiley.

MOSTON, Stephen – STEPHENSON, Geoffrey M. – WILLIAMSON, Thomas M. (1992): The Effects of Case Characteristics on Suspect Behaviour During Police Questioning. The British Journal of Criminology, 32(1), 23–40. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjc.a048178

PEARSE, John – GUDJONSSON, Gisli H. (1996): Police Interviewing Techniques at Two South London Police Stations. Psychology Crime and Law, 3(1), 63–74. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/10683169608409795

Principles on Effective Interviewing for Investigations and Information Gathering (2021). Online: https://www.apt.ch/sites/default/files/publications/apt_PoEI_EN_11.pdf

SMITH, David (1983): A Survey of Londoners. Report Number 1. London: Policy Studies Institute.

ST-YVES, Michel – DESLAURIERS-VARIN, Nadine (2009): The Psychology of Suspects’ Decision-making during Interrogation. In BULL, Ray – VALENTINE, Tim – WILLIAMSON, Tom (eds.): Handbook of Psychology of Investigative Interviewing. Current Developments and Future Directions. Hoboken: Wiley, 1–16. Online: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470747599.ch1

TSAN-CHANG, Lin – CHIH-HUNG, Shih (2013): A Study of Police Interrogation Practice in Taiwan. Paper presented at the Asian Confer¬ence of Criminal and Police Psychology, Singapore.

WACHI, Taeko – WATANABE, Kazumi – YOKOTA, Kaeko – OTSUKA, Yusuke – KURAISHI, Hiroki – LAMB, Michael (2014): Police Interviewing Styles and Confessions in Japan. Psychology, Crime and Law, 20(7), 673–694. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2013.854791

WACHI, Taeko – WATANABE, Kazumi – YOKOTA, Kaeko – OTSUKA, Yusuke – LAMB, Michael (2016): Japanese Suspect Interviews, Confessions, and Related Factors. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 31(3), 217–27. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-015-9179-0

WALSH, Dave – BULL, Ray (2010): What Really Is Effective in Interviews with Suspects? A Study Comparing Interviewing Skills against Interviewing Outcomes. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 15(2), 305–321. Online: https://doi.org/10.1348/135532509X463356

WILLIAMSON, Tom (1994): Reflections on Current Police Practice. In MORGAN, David – STEPHENSON, Geoffrey (eds.): Suspicion and Silence. The Right to Silence in Criminal Investigations. London: Blackstone, 107–116.

Letöltések

Letölthető adat még nem áll rendelkezésre.