object(Publication)#815 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(29) { ["id"]=> int(7854) ["accessStatus"]=> int(0) ["datePublished"]=> string(10) "2024-10-14" ["lastModified"]=> string(19) "2024-10-14 14:45:22" ["sectionId"]=> int(133) ["seq"]=> int(1) ["submissionId"]=> int(7730) ["status"]=> int(3) ["version"]=> int(1) ["categoryIds"]=> array(0) { } ["citationsRaw"]=> string(14936) "Aguillo, I. F. (2022). Bibliometría sofisticada [Sophisticated Bibliometrics]. Anuario ThinkEPI, 16. Online: https://doi.org/10.3145/thinkepi.2022.e16e28 Assimakis, N. & Adam, M. (2010). A New Author’s Productivity Index: P-index. Scientometrics, 85(2), 415–427. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0255-z Baird, L. M. & Oppenheim, C. (1994). Do Citations Matter? Journal of Information Science, 20(1), 2–15. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/016555159402000102 Bajnok, A., Kriskó, E., Tari, A. & Demeter, M. (2022). Habitus Formation and Perceived Academic Norms of Hungarian Communication Scholars. KOME: An International Journal of Pure Communication Inquiry, 10(1), 59–79. Bauder, H., Hannah, C. A. & Lujan, O. (2017). International Experience in the Academic Field: Knowledge Production, Symbolic Capital, and Mobility Fetishism. Population, Space and Place, 23(6), 1–13. Online: https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.2040 Bihari, A., Tripathi, S. & Deepak, A. (2023). A Review on H-index and Its Alternative Indices. Journal of Information Science, 49(3), 624–665. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/01655515211014478 Blasco, O., Demeter, M. & Goyanes, M. (2024). A Contribution-Based Indicator of Research Productivity: Theoretical Definition and Empirical Testing in the Field of Communication. Online Information Review, 48(4), 823–840. Online: https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-11-2022-0634 Bordignon, F., Chaignon, L. & Egret, E. (2023). Promoting Narrative CVs to Improve Research Evaluation? A Review of Opinion Pieces and Experiments. Research Evaluation, 32(2), 313–320. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvad013 Bourdieu, P. (1988). Homo Academicus. P. Collier (trans.). Polity. Bourdieu, P. (1996b). The State 1. Elite Schools in the Field of Power. L. C. Clough (trans.). Polity. Bourdieu, P. (1999a). The Weight of the World. Social Suffering in Contemporary Society. P. Parkhurst Ferguson, S. Emanuel, J. Johnson, Sh. T. Waryn (trans.). Stanford University Press. Bourdieu, P. (2004). Science of Science and Reflexivity. R. Nice (trans.). Polity. Bornmann, L. & Daniel, H. D. (2007). What Do We Know about the h Index? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(9), 1381–1385. Online: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20609 Bornmann, L. & Mutz, R. (2015). Growth Rates of Modern Science: A Bibliometric Analysis Based on the Number of Publications and Cited References. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(11), 2215–2222. Online: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23329 Burris, V. (2004). The Academic Caste System: Prestige Hierarchies in PhD Exchange Networks. American Sociological Review, 69(2), 239–264. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240406900205 Callaham, M., Wears, R. L. & Weber, E. (2002). Journal Prestige, Publication Bias, and Other Characteristics Associated with Citation of Published Studies in Peer-Reviewed Journals. Jama, 287(21), 2847–2850. Online: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.287.21.2847 Canagarajah, A. S. (2002). A Geopolitics of Academic Writing. University of Pittsburgh Press. Crossley, N. (2004). On Systematically Distorted Communication: Bourdieu and the Socio-Analysis of Publics. The Sociological Review, 52(Suppl. 1), 88–112. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2004.00475.x Deardorff, D. K. & van Gaalen, A. (2023). Assessing Internationalization Outcomes. In D. K. Deardorff, H. de Wit, B. Leask & H. Charles (Eds.), The Handbook of International Higher Education (pp. 147–164). Routledge. Deer, C. (2014). Doxa. In M. Grenfell (Ed.), Pierre Bourdieu. Key Concepts. Routledge. Demeter, M. (2018). Theorizing International Inequalities in Communication and Media Studies. A Field Theory Approach. KOME: An International Journal of Pure Communication Inquiry, 6(2), 92–110. Demeter, M. (2019). The World-Systemic Dynamics of Knowledge Production: The Distribution of Transnational Academic Capital in the Social Sciences. Journal of World-Systems Research, 25(1), 111–144. Online: https://doi.org/10.5195/JWSR.2019.887 Demeter, M. (2020). Academic Knowledge Production and the Global South. Questioning Inequality and Under-representation. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52701-3 Fang, Z., Costas, R., Tian, W., Wang, X. & Wouters, P. (2021). How is Science Clicked on Twitter? Click Metrics for Bitly Short Links to Scientific Publications. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 72, 918–932. Online: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24458 Ferrare, J. J. & Apple, M. W. (2015). Field Theory and Educational Practice: Bourdieu and the Pedagogic Qualities of Local Field Positions in Educational Contexts. Cambridge Journal of Education, 45(1), 43–59. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2014.988682 Foucault, M. (1978). The History of Sexuality. Vol. 1: An Introduction. R. Hurley. (trans.). Pantheon. Goyanes, M. & Demeter, M. (2021). Dr. Excellent: The Systemic and Personal Conditions for Being an Academic Star in Communication Studies. KOME: An International Journal of Pure Communication Inquiry, 9(2), 65–80. Online: https://doi.org/10.17646/KOME.75672.64 Goyanes, M., Demeter, M., Grane, A., Toth, T. & de Zúñiga, H. G. (2023). Research Patterns in Communication (2009–2019): Testing Female Representation and Productivity Differences, within the Most Cited Authors and the Field. Scientometrics, 128(1), 137–156. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04575-4 Glänzel, W. & Thijs, B. (2004). The Influence of Author Self-Citations on Bibliometric Macro Indicators. Scientometrics, 59(3), 281–310. Online: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000018535.99885.e9 Grenfell, M. (2014). Interest. In M. Grenfell (Ed.), Pierre Bourdieu. Key Concepts. Routledge. Hadas, M. (2021). Outlines of a Theory of Plural Habitus: Bourdieu Revisited. Routledge. Hagen, N. T. (2010). Harmonic Publication and Citation Counting: Sharing Authorship Credit Equitably – not Equally, Geometrically or Arithmetically. Scientometrics, 84(3), 785–793. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0129-4 Havas, Á. & Fáber, Á. (2020). A heteronóm akadémia felemelkedése az EU peremvidékein [The Rise of the Heteronomous Academy on the EU’s Periphery]. Replika, (115), 131–140. He, Q., Chen, B., Pei, J., Qiu, B., Mitra, P. & Giles, L. (2009). Detecting Topic Evolution in Scientific Literature: How can Citations Help? Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, 957–966. Online: https://doi.org/10.1145/1645953.1646076 Heilbron, J., Sora, G. & Boncourt, T. (2018). The Social and Human Sciences in Global Power Relations. Palgrave Macmillan. Hilgers, M. & Mangez, E. (2015). Bourdieu’s Theory of Social Fields. Concepts and Applications. Routledge. Horányi, Ö. ed. (2007). A kommunikáció mint participáció [Communication as Participation]. Typotex. Hunter, L. (2004). Bourdieu and the Social Space of the PE Class: Reproduction of Doxa through Practice. Sport, Education and Society, 9(2), 175–192. Johnes, J. (2018). University Rankings: What Do They Really Show? Scientometrics, 115(1), 585–606. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2666-1 Kaur, J., Hoang, D. T., Sun, X., Possamai, L., JafariAsbagh, M., Patil, S. & Menczer, F. (2012). Scholarometer: A Social Framework for Analyzing Impact across Disciplines. PLoS ONE, 7(9). Online: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0043235 Kuhn, T. S. (1997). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Kwiek, M. (2012). Knowledge Production in European Universities: States, Markets, and Academic Entrepreneurialism. Peter Lang. Larivière, V. & Costas, R. (2016). How Many is Too Many? On the Relationship between Research Productivity and Impact. PLOS ONE, 11(9). Online: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162709 Labinger, J. A. (2023). Connecting Literature and Science. Routledge. Online: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003197188 Lauf, E. (2005). National Diversity of Major International Journals in the Field of Communication. Journal of Communication, 55(1), 19–151. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2005.tb02663.x Leung, M. W. H. (2013). ‘Read Ten Thousand Books, Walk Ten Thousand Miles’: Geographical Mobility and Capital Accumulation among Chinese Scholars. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 38(2), 311–324. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2012.00526.x Liu, F., Hu, G., Tang, L. & Liu, W. (2018). The Penalty of Containing More non-English Articles. Scientometrics, 114(1), 359–366. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2577-6 Miranda, R. & Garcia-Carpintero, E. (2019). Comparison of the Share of Documents and Citations from Different Quartile Journals in 25 Research Areas. Scientometrics, 121(1), 479–501. Online: https://doi. org/10.1007/s11192-019-03210-z Muñoz-García, A. L. (2019). Intellectual Endogamy in the University: The Neoliberal Regulation of Academic Work. Learning and Teaching, 12(2), 24–43. Online: https://doi.org/10.3167/latiss.2019.120203 Moed, H. F., Burger, W. J. M., Frankfort, J. G. & van Raan, A. F. J. (1985). The Use of Bibliometric Data for the Measurement of University Research Performance. Research Policy, 14(3), 131–149. Online: https:// doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(85)90012-5 Newman, M. E. (2001). The Structure of Scientific Collaboration Networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(2), 404–409. Online: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.98.2.404 Oshima, A. & Hogue, A. (2007). Introduction to Academic Writing. Pearson/Longman. Pan, R. K., Kaski, K. & Fortunato, S. (2012). World Citation and Collaboration Networks: Uncovering the Role of Geography in Science. Scientific Reports, 2(1), 902. Online: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep00902 Parchomovsky, G. (2000). Publish or Perish. Michigan Law Review, 98(4), 926–952. Pérez Esparrells, C., Bautista-Puig, N. & Orduña-Malea, E. (2022). La evaluación pública de la investigación científica en el contexto internacional: Posibilidades y límites [Public Evaluation of Scientific Research in the International Context: Possibilities and Limits]. Informe I [Report]. Online: https://repositorio.uam.es/handle/10486/705530 Pietrucha, J. (2018). Country-Specific Determinants of World University Rankings. Scientometrics, 114, 1129–1139. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2634-1 Priem, J., Taraborelli, D., Groth, P. & Neylon, C. (2010). Altmetrics: A Manifesto. Altmetrics. Online: http://altmetrics.org/manifesto/ Rajkó, A., Herendy, C., Goyanes, M. & Demeter, M. (2023). The Matilda Effect in Communication Research: The Effects of Gender and Geography on Usage and Citations across 11 Countries. Communication Research, 0(0). Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502221124389 Recke, R. (2011). Converging Principles of Norm, Rule, and Practice: Tracing Normativity beyond Semantics in Bourdieu’s Outline of a Theory of Practice. Res Cogitans, 2, 167–192. Rothenberger, L. T., Auer, C. & Pratt, C. B. (2017). Theoretical Approaches to Normativity in Communication Research. Communication Theory, 27(2), 176–201. Rustin, M. (2016). The Neoliberal University and Its Alternatives. Soundings, 63(63), 147–176. Online: https://doi.org/10.3898/136266216819377057 Sapiro, G. (2003). The Literary Field between the State and the Market. Poetics, 31(5–6), 441–464. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2003.09.001 Sapiro, G. (2020). The Transnational Literary Field between (Inter)-nationalism and Cosmopolitanism. Journal of World Literature, 5(4), 481–504. Online: https://doi.org/10.1163/24056480-00504002 Sapiro, G., Santoro, M. & Baert, P. eds. (2020). Ideas on the Move in the Social Sciences and Humanities. The International Circulation of Paradigms and Theorists. Socio-Historical Studies of the Social and Human Sciences. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. Savage, J. D. (2000). Funding Science in America: Congress, Universities, and the Politics of the Academic Pork Barrel. Cambridge University Press. Sedighi, M. (2020). Evaluating the Impact of Research Using the Altmetrics Approach (Case Study: The Field of Scientometrics). Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, 69(4–5), 241–252. Online: https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-02-2019-0013 Schmitt, N. (2012). The Oxford Handbook of Personnel Assessment and Selection. Oxford University Press. SciVal (2021). SciVal Usage and Patent Metrics Guidebook. Elsevier. Online: https://www.research.psu.edu/sites/default/files/SciVal%20User%20Guide.pdf Stephen, T. D. (2011). A Methodology for Calculating Prestige Ranks of Academic Journals in Communication: A More Inclusive Alternative to Citation Metrics. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, 30(2), 63–71. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/01639269.2011.565404 Sugiharto, S. (2021). De-Westernizing Hegemonic Knowledge in Global Academic Publishing: Toward a Politics of Locality. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 16(4), 321–333. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/17447143.2021.2017442 Tahamtan, I., Safipour Afshar, A. & Ahamdzadeh, K. (2016). Factors Affecting Number of Citations: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature. Scientometrics, 107, 1195–1225. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1889-2 Thatcher, J., Ingram, N., Burke, C. & Abrahams, J. (2016). Bourdieu: The Next Generation. The Development of Bourdieu’s Intellectual Heritage in Contemporary UK Sociology. Routledge. Tomlinson, G. & Freeman, S. (2018). Who Really Selected you? Insights into Faculty Selection Processes in Top-Ranked Higher Education Graduate Programmes. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 42(6), 855–867. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2017.1323192 Torres-Salinas, D., Arroyo-Machado, W. & Robinson-Garcia, N. (2023). Bibliometric Denialism. Scientometrics, 128, 5357–5359. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04787-2 Torres-Salinas, D., Orduña-Malea, E., Delgado-Vázquez, A. & Arroyo-Machado, W. (2024). Fundamentos de Bibliometría Narrativa [Fundamentals of Narrative Bibliometrics] (v.1). Zenodo. Online: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10512837 Tóth, T., Demeter, M., Csuhai, S. & Major, Z. B. (2024). When Career-Boosting is on the Line: Equity and Inequality in Grant Evaluation, Productivity, and the Educational Backgrounds of Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions Individual Fellows in Social Sciences and Humanities. Journal of Informetrics, 18(2). Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2024.101516 Wacquant, L. (2018). Bourdieu Comes to Town: Pertinence, Principles, Applications. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 42(1), 90–105. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12535 Wiedemann, T. & Meyen, M. (2016). Internationalization through Americanization: The Expansion of the International Communication Association’s Leadership to the World. International Journal of Communication, 10, 1489–1509." ["copyrightYear"]=> int(2024) ["issueId"]=> int(593) ["licenseUrl"]=> string(43) "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0" ["pages"]=> string(6) "3–27" ["pub-id::doi"]=> string(19) "10.17646/KOME.of.19" ["abstract"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(1270) "

This paper introduces the concept of narrative literaturemetrics, a novel mixedmethods approach that applies the quantitative metrics traditionally used in bibliometrics to the field of literature. Utilising an extended version of Bourdieu’s field theory, this study draws parallels between academia and literature, emphasising the applicability of concepts such as capital, field, and agents to literary analysis. Despite the evident similarities, there has been a surprising lack of field-theoretical studies employing bibliometric methodologies within literary studies. This paper addresses that gap by outlining the theoretical foundations and methodological considerations of narrative literaturemetrics. It discusses adapting bibliometric indicators to literary analysis and highlights the distinctions necessary to respect the unique norms governing literature and academia. Furthermore, the paper explores the emerging qualitative turn in bibliometrics, particularly the development of narrative bibliometrics, and its relevance to the proposed approach. By detailing the conceptual framework and potential applications of narrative literaturemetrics, this study aims to establish a comprehensive model for future empirical research in literary studies.

" } ["copyrightHolder"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(26) "Julian David Romero Torres" } ["prefix"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" } ["subtitle"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" } ["title"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(54) "Prolegomena for any Future Narrative Literaturemetrics" } ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["authors"]=> array(1) { [0]=> object(Author)#858 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(15) { ["id"]=> int(9928) ["email"]=> string(24) "julian.romero@uni-nke.hu" ["includeInBrowse"]=> bool(true) ["publicationId"]=> int(7854) ["seq"]=> int(1) ["userGroupId"]=> int(339) ["country"]=> string(2) "HU" ["orcid"]=> string(0) "" ["url"]=> string(0) "" ["affiliation"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(70) "Ludovika University of Public Service, Department for Science Strategy" } ["biography"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" } ["familyName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(13) "Romero Torres" } ["givenName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(12) "Julian David" } ["preferredPublicName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(26) "Julian David Romero Torres" } ["submissionLocale"]=> string(5) "en_US" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } ["keywords"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> array(4) { [0]=> string(14) "scientometrics" [1]=> string(23) "narrative bibliometrics" [2]=> string(27) "narrative literaturemetrics" [3]=> string(12) "field theory" } } ["subjects"]=> array(0) { } ["disciplines"]=> array(0) { } ["languages"]=> array(0) { } ["supportingAgencies"]=> array(0) { } ["galleys"]=> array(1) { [0]=> object(ArticleGalley)#871 (7) { ["_submissionFile"]=> NULL ["_data"]=> array(9) { ["submissionFileId"]=> int(36170) ["id"]=> int(6074) ["isApproved"]=> bool(false) ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["label"]=> string(3) "PDF" ["publicationId"]=> int(7854) ["seq"]=> int(0) ["urlPath"]=> string(0) "" ["urlRemote"]=> string(0) "" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(true) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) }

object(Publication)#150 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(29) { ["id"]=> int(7607) ["accessStatus"]=> int(0) ["datePublished"]=> string(10) "2024-10-14" ["lastModified"]=> string(19) "2024-10-14 14:45:23" ["sectionId"]=> int(133) ["seq"]=> int(2) ["submissionId"]=> int(7483) ["status"]=> int(3) ["version"]=> int(1) ["categoryIds"]=> array(0) { } ["citationsRaw"]=> string(15743) "Al-Khasawneh, F. M. (2017). A genre analysis of research article abstracts written by native and non-native speakers of English. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 4(1), 1–13. Alonso-Almeida, F. (2014). Evidential and epistemic devices in English and Spanish medical, computing and legal scientific abstracts: A contrastive study. In M. Bondi & R. Lorés Sanz (Eds.), Abstracts in Academic Discourse. Variation and Change (pp. 21–42). Bern: Peter Lang. Azar, A. S., Praemela, H., Farook, I. M. & Romli, N. H. (2022). A Comparative Analysis of Stance Features in Research Article Introductions: Malaysian and English Authors. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 22(2), 261–287. Online: https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2022-2202-14 Belyakova, M. (2017). Análisis contrastivo inglés-ruso de resúmenes de artículos de investigación del ámbito de geociencias [English–Asian cross-linguistic comparison of research article abstracts in geoscience]. Estudios de Lingüística Universidad de Alicante, (31), 27–45. Online: https://doi.org/10.14198/ELUA2017.31.02 Bloor, D. (1991). Knowledge and Social Imagery. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Bogdanović, V. & Mirović, I. (2018). Young researchers writing in ESL and the use of metadiscourse: Learning the ropes. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 18(4), 813–830. Online: https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2018.4.0031 Boginskaya, O. (2022a). Functional categories of hedges: A diachronic study of Russian research article abstracts. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 26(3), 645–667. Online: https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-30017 Boginskaya, O. (2022b). Cross-disciplinary variation in metadiscourse: A corpus-based analysis of Russian-authored research article abstracts. Training, Language and Culture, 6(3), 55–66. Online: https://doi.org/10.22363/2521-442X-2022-6-3-55-66 Boginskaya, O. (2023). Interactional Metadiscourse Markers in English Research Article Abstracts Written by Non-Native Authors: A Corpus-Based Contrastive Study. Ikala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura, 28(1), 139–154. Online: https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.v28n1a08 Bondi, M. (2014). Changing voices: Authorial voice in abstracts. M. Bondi & R. Lorés Sanz (Eds.), Abstracts in Academic Discourse. Variation and Change (pp. 243–270). Bern: Peter Lang. Online: https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-0351-0701-2 Clyne, M. (1987). Cultural differences in the organization of academic texts. Journal of Pragmatics, 11(2), 211–247. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(87)90196-2 Čmejrková, S. (2007). The (re)presentation of the author in Czech and Slovak scientific texts. Jezik in Slovstvo, 52(3–4), 21–31. Dawang, H. (2006). A tale of two English-language publication contexts for Chinese scientists – recontextualization in the coalesced Results and Discussion section. In C. Pérez-Llantada, R. Plo Alastrué & C. P. Neumann (Eds.), Actas de V Congreso Internacional AELFE / Proceedings of the 5th International AELFE Conference (pp. 19–28). Universidad de Zaragoza. Dontcheva-Navratilova, O. (2013). Authorial presence in academic discourse: Functions of author-reference pronouns. Linguistica Pragensia, 23(1), 9–30. Duszak, A. (1994). Academic discourse and intellectual styles. Journal of Pragmatics, 21(3), 291–313. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)90003-5 Galtung, J. (1981). Structure, culture, and intellectual style: An essay comparing saxonic, teutonic, gallic and nipponic approaches. Social Science Information, 20(6), 817–856. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/053901848102000601 Gessesse, C. M. (2016). An investigation into the macro rhetorical structures of the EFL research abstracts of graduates of 2013: The case of Bahir Dar University in Ethiopia. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 6(1), 1–22. Online: https://doi.org/10.29333/ojcmt/2534 Gnutzmann, C. (1989). Sprachliche Indikatoren zur Explizierung von ‘Zielsetzungen’ im Englischen und Deutschen. Ms. eines Vortrags auf dem 9 IDV-Kongress in Wien 13, 10–15. Gu, J. Z. (2008). Rhetorical clash between Chinese and Westerners. Intercultural Communication Studies, 17(4), 44–51. Harris, Z. (1959). Computable syntactic analysis. Transformations and Discourse Analysis Papers, 15. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania. Hinkel, E. (1997). Indirectness in L1 and L2 academic writing. Journal of Pragmatics, 27(3), 360–386. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(96)00040-9 Hinds, J. (1987). Reader Versus Writer Responsibility: A New Typology. In U. Connor & R. Kaplan (Eds.), Writing across Languages: Analysis of L2 Texts (pp. 141–152). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Hryniuk, K. (2018). Expert-Like Use of Hedges and Boosters in Research Articles Written by Polish and English Native-Speaker Writers. Research in Language, 16(3), 263–280. Online: https://doi.org/10.2478/rela-2018-0013 Hu, G. & Cao, F. (2011). Hedging and boosting in abstracts of applied linguistics articles: A comparative study of English- and Chinese-medium journals. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(11), 2795–2809. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.04.007 Hyland, K. (2002a). Directives: Argument and Engagement in Academic Writing. Applied Linguistics, 23(2), 215–239. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/23.2.215 Hyland, K. (2002b). Authority and Invisibility: Authorial Identity in Academic Writing. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(8), 1091–1112. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00035-8 Hyland, K. (2005a). Metadiscourse. Exploring Interaction in Writing. London: Continuum. Hyland, K. (2005b). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7(2), 173–192. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605050365 Hyland, K. (2008). Persuasion, interaction and the construction of knowledge: Representing self and others in research writing. International Journal of English Studies, 8(2), 1–23. Online: https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes.8.2.49151 Hyland, K. & Jiang, F. K. (2016). ‘We must conclude that...’: A diachronic study of academic engagement. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 24, 29–42. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2016.09.003 Hyland, K. & Tse, P. (2004). Metadiscourse in Academic Writing: A Reappraisal. Applied Linguistics, 25(2), 156–177. Online: http://doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.2.156 Hyland, K. & Zou, H. (2021). “I believe the findings are fascinating”: Stance in three-minute theses. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 50. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2021.100973 Işık-Taş, E. E. (2018). Authorial identity in Turkish language and English language research articles in Sociology: The role of publication context in academic writers’ discourse choices. English for Specific Purposes, 49, 26–38. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2017.10.003 Ji, X. (2015). Comparison of abstracts written by native speakers and second language learners. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 5(5), 470–474. Online: https://doi.org/10.4236/ojml.2015.55041 Kaplan, R. (1966). Cultural Thought Patterns in Inter-Cultural Communication. Language Learning, 16(1–2), 1–20. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1966.tb00804.x Kaplan, R. (1972). The Anatomy of Rhetoric. Prolegomena to a Functional Theory of Rhetoric. Philadelphia, PA: Center for Curriculum Development. Khajavy, G. H., Asadpour, S. F. & Yousefi, A. (2012). A Comparative Analysis of Interactive Metadiscourse Features in Discussion Section of Research Articles Written in English and Persian. International Journal of Linguistics, 4(2), 147–159. Online: https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v4i2.1767 Khoutyz, I. (2015). Engagement in written academic discourse: A cross-cultural study of Russian and English research articles. International Journal of Russian Studies, 4(2), 135–160. Kim, L. C. & Lim, J. (2013). Metadiscourse in English and Chinese research article introductions. Discourse Studies, 15(2), 129–146. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445612471476 Kobayashi, Y. (2016). Investigating Metadiscourse Markers in Asian Englishes: A Corpus-Based Approach. Language in Focus Journal, 2(1), 19–35. Online: https://doi.org/10.1515/lifijsal-2016-0002 Koutsantoni, D. (2004). Attitude, certainty and allusions to common knowledge in scientific research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 3(2), 163–182. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2003.08.001 Kozubíková Šandová, J. (2021). Interpersonality in research article abstracts: a diachronic case study. Discourse and Interaction, 14(1), 77–99. Online: https://doi.org/10.5817/DI2021-1-77 Kustyasari, D., Basthomi, Y. & Anugerahwati, M. (2021). Interactive and interactional metadiscourse markers in research articles of Indonesian expert writers. Journal of English Education Society, 6(1), 90–95. Online: https://doi.org/10.21070/jees.v6i1.1082 Lee, J. J. & Casal, E. (2014). Metadiscourse in results and discussion chapters: A cross-linguistic analysis of English and Spanish thesis writers in engineering. System, 46(1), 39–54. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.07.009 Lee, J. J. & Deakin, L. (2016). Interactions in L1 and L2 undergraduate student writing: Interactional metadiscourse in successful and less-successful argumentative essays. Journal of Second Language Writing, 33, 21–34. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2016.06.004 Li, Z. & Xu, J. (2020). Reflexive metadiscourse in Chinese and English sociology research article introductions and discussions. Journal of Pragmatics, 159(2), 47–59. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.02.003 Li, T. & Wharton, S. (2012). Metadiscourse repertoire of L1 Mandarin undergraduates writing in English: A cross-contextual, cross-disciplinary study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(4), 345–356. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2012.07.004 Liu, C. (2007). The empirical study on the use of metadiscourse in argumentative writing. Journal of Hebei Normal University of Science & Technology (Social Science), 6(1), 29–33. Lu, X. (2000). The influence of classical Chinese rhetoric on contemporary Chinese political communication and social relations. In D. R. Heisey (Ed.), Chinese Perspective in Rhetoric and Communication (pp. 3–23). Stamford, Connecticut: Ablex Publishing Corporation. Maamuujav, U., Olson, C. B. & Chung, H. (2021). Syntactic and lexical features of adolescent L2 students’ academic writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 53. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2021.100822 Mauranen, A. (1993). Cultural Differences in Academic Rhetoric. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. Mikolaychik, M. (2019). Lexical Hedging in English Abstracts of Asian Economics Research Articles: A Corpus-Based Study. Science Journal of Volgograd State University, Linguistics, 19(5), 38–47. Online: https://doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu2.2020.5.4 Mur-Dueñas, P. (2010). Attitude markers in business management research articles: A cross-cultural corpus-driven approach. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 20(1), 50–72. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2009.00228.x Mur-Dueñas, P. & Šinkūnienė, I. (2016). Self-reference in research articles across Europe and Asia: A review of studies. Brno Studies in English, 42(1), 71–92. Online: https://doi.org/10.5817/BSE2016-1-4 Paradiž, M. (2020). Competing for Funding. Contrasting Slovene and British Genre Conventions in Research Grant Proposals. In A. Pisanski Peterlin & T. M. Južnič (Eds.), Academic Writing from Cross-Cultural Perspectives. Exploring the Synergies and Interactions (pp. 144–173). Ljubljana University Press. Online: https://doi.org/10.4312/9789610603085 Park, Y. S. & Kim, B. S. (2008). Asian and European American Cultural Values and Communication Styles Among Asian American and European American College Students. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 14(1), 47–56. Online: https://doi.org/10.1037/1099-9809.14.1.47 Perales-Escudero, M. & Swales, J. (2011). Tracing convergence and divergence in pairs of Spanish and English research article abstracts: The case of Ibérica. Ibérica, (21), 49–70. Pisanski Peterlin, A. (2005). Text-organising metatext in research articles: An English–Slovene contrastive analysis. English for Specific Purposes, 24(3), 307–319. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2004.11.001 Qi, X. & Liu, L. (2007). Differences between Reader/Writer Responsible Languages Reflected in EFL Learners’ Writing. Intercultural Communication Studies, 16(3), 148–159. Schiffrin, D. (1980). Meta-talk: Organisational and Evaluative Brackets in Discourse. Sociological Inquiry, 50(3–4), 199–236. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1980.tb00021.x Stotesbury, H. (2003). Evaluation in research article abstracts in the narrative and hard sciences. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2(4), 327–341. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1475-1585(03)00049-3 Swales, J. M. & Burke, A. (2003). “It’s really fascinating work”: Differences in Evaluative Adjectives across Academic Registers. In P. Leistyna & Ch. F. Meyer (Eds.), Corpus Analysis. Language Structure and Language Use (pp. 1–18). Rodopi. Online: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004334410_002 Tang, R. & John, S. (1999). The ‘I’ in identity: Exploring writer identity in student academic writing through the first person pronoun. English for Specific Purposes, 18(Suppl. 1), S23–S39. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(99)00009-5 Yoon, S. (2011). Is Korean Really a Listener-Responsible Language Like Japanese? A Contrastive Analysis of Discourse in Apologies between Korean and Japanese. Acta Linguistica Asiatica, 1(3), 73–94. Online: https://doi.org/10.4312/ala.1.3.73-94 Van Bonn, S. & Swales, J. (2007). English and French journal abstracts in the language sciences: Three exploratory studies. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6(2), 93–108. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2007.04.001 Vassileva, I. (1998). Who am I/who are we in academic writing? A contrastive analysis of authorial presence in English, German, French, Russian and Bulgarian. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(2), 163–190. Vassileva, I. (2001). Commitment and detachment in English and Bulgarian academic writing. English for Specific Purposes, 20(1), 83–102. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(99)00029-0 Walková, M. (2018). Author’s self-representation in research articles by Anglophone and Slovak linguists. Discourse and Interaction, 11(1), 86–105. Online: https://doi.org/10.5817/DI2018-1-86 Yakhontova, T. (1997). The signs of a new time: Academic writing in ESP curricula of Ukrainian universities. In A. Duszak (Ed.), Culture and Styles of Academic Discourse (pp. 323–341). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Online: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110821048.103 Xiong, D. (2007). A Comparison Between English and Chinese Metadiscourse. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University, 7(6), 101–105. Wu, S. M. (2007). The use of engagement resources in high- and low-rated undergraduate geography essays. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6(3), 254–271. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2007.09.006 Wu, G. & Zhu, Y. (2015). Self-mention and authorial identity construction in English and Chinese research articles: A contrastive study. Linguistics and the Human Sciences, 10(2), 133–158. Online: https://doi.org/10.1558/lhs.v10i2.28557 Zou, H. & Hyland, K. (2020). Academic blogging: Scholars’ views on interacting with readers. Ibérica, (39), 267–294. Online: https://doi.org/10.17398/2340-2784.39.267" ["copyrightYear"]=> int(2024) ["issueId"]=> int(593) ["licenseUrl"]=> string(43) "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0" ["pages"]=> string(7) "43–68" ["pub-id::doi"]=> string(19) "10.17646/KOME.of.12" ["abstract"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(991) "

There is a perception that the influence of culture-specific rhetorical styles means that academic writing can include a great deal of variety. This study aims to test this hypothesis by exploring the role of rhetorical styles in the choice of interactional metadiscourse by academic writers with different cultural backgrounds. Linguistics research article abstracts by L2 writers from Asian and Slavic countries were used in this contrastive study based on Hyland’s (2005a) model of metadiscourse. Using quantitative and qualitative analysis methods, the study revealed that English-language academic discourse by Slavic writers contained a larger number of hedges and attitude markers and a smaller number of boosters. In contrast to Slavic writers, Asian scholars left far fewer traces of themselves and took more explicitly involved positions. The paper contributes to intercultural pragmatics and may have some implications for English as a lingua franca in academic settings.

" } ["copyrightHolder"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(15) "Olga Boginskaya" } ["prefix"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(3) "The" } ["subtitle"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" } ["title"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(82) "Effect of Rhetorical Styles on Metadiscourse Choices of Culturally Diverse Authors" } ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["authors"]=> array(1) { [0]=> object(Author)#76 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(15) { ["id"]=> int(9539) ["email"]=> string(24) "olgaa_boginskaya@mail.ru" ["includeInBrowse"]=> bool(true) ["publicationId"]=> int(7607) ["seq"]=> int(2) ["userGroupId"]=> int(339) ["country"]=> string(2) "RU" ["orcid"]=> string(0) "" ["url"]=> string(0) "" ["affiliation"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" } ["biography"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" } ["familyName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(10) "Boginskaya" } ["givenName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(4) "Olga" } ["preferredPublicName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" } ["submissionLocale"]=> string(5) "en_US" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } ["keywords"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> array(5) { [0]=> string(16) "rhetorical style" [1]=> string(13) "metadiscourse" [2]=> string(25) "research article abstract" [3]=> string(18) "academic discourse" [4]=> string(16) "cultural context" } } ["subjects"]=> array(0) { } ["disciplines"]=> array(0) { } ["languages"]=> array(0) { } ["supportingAgencies"]=> array(0) { } ["galleys"]=> array(1) { [0]=> object(ArticleGalley)#868 (7) { ["_submissionFile"]=> NULL ["_data"]=> array(9) { ["submissionFileId"]=> int(36172) ["id"]=> int(5861) ["isApproved"]=> bool(false) ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["label"]=> string(3) "PDF" ["publicationId"]=> int(7607) ["seq"]=> int(0) ["urlPath"]=> string(0) "" ["urlRemote"]=> string(0) "" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(true) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) }

object(Publication)#152 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(29) { ["id"]=> int(7734) ["accessStatus"]=> int(0) ["datePublished"]=> string(10) "2024-10-14" ["lastModified"]=> string(19) "2024-10-14 14:45:23" ["primaryContactId"]=> int(9742) ["sectionId"]=> int(133) ["seq"]=> int(3) ["submissionId"]=> int(7610) ["status"]=> int(3) ["version"]=> int(1) ["categoryIds"]=> array(0) { } ["citationsRaw"]=> string(19423) "Albæk, E., van Dalen, A., Jebril, N. & de Vreese, C. H. (2014). Political Journalism in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge University Press. Artero, J. P., Orive, V. & Latorre, P. (2020). Composición y predictores sociodemográficos de los consumidores de noticias [Socio-demographic profiles and predictors of news consumers]. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, (77), 55–72. Online: https://www.doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2020-1449 Ariel, Y., Unkel, J., Weimann Saks, D. & Malka, V. E. (2023). Far away but close at heart? German and Israeli consumption of news concerning the 2022 Russian–Ukrainian war. Media, War & Conflict. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/17506352231212415 Blumler, J. G., McLeod, J. M. & Rosengren, K. E. (1992). Comparatively Speaking. Communication and Culture Across Space and Time. Sage. Boczkowski, P., Mitchelstein, E. & Matassi, M. (2018). “News comes across when I’m in a moment of leisure”: Understanding the practices of incidental news consumption on social media. New Media & Society, 20(10), 3523–3539. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817750396 Broersma, M. & Peters, C. (2017). Introduction. Towards a Functional Perspective on Journalism’s Role and Relevance. In C. Peters & M. Broersma (Eds.), Rethinking Journalism Again. Societal Role and Public Relevance in a Digital Age (pp. 1–17). Routledge. Brüggemann, M., Engesser, S., Büchel, F., Humprecht, E. & Castro, L. (2014). Hallin and Mancini Revisited: Four Empirical Types of Western Media Systems. Journal of Communication, 64(6), 1037–1065. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12127 Canel, M. J., Rodríguez, R. & Sánchez Aranda, J. J. (2000). Periodistas al descubierto. Retrato de los profesionales de la información. CIS. Carey, J. W. (1989). Communication as Culture. Essays on Media and Society. Routledge. Carlson, M. (2017). Journalistic Authority. Legitimating News in the Digital Era. Columbia University Press. Casero-Ripollés, A. (2018). Research on political information and social media: Key points and challenges for the future. Profesional de la información, 27(5), 964–974. Online: https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2018.sep.01 Casero-Ripollés, A. (2020). Impact of Covid-19 on the media system. Communicative and democratic consequences of news consumption during the outbreak. Profesional de la información, 29(2). Online: https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.mar.23 Cassidy, W. P. (2005). Variations on a Theme: Professional Role Conceptions of Print and Online Newspaper Journalists. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 82(2), 264–280. Online: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/107769900508200203 Castro, L., Strömbäck, J., Esser, F., Van Aelst, P., de Vreese, C. H. & Aalberg, T. (2022). Navigating high-choice European political information environments: A comparative analysis of news user profiles and political knowledge. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 27(4), 827–859. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612211012572 Chadwick, A. (2017). The Hybrid Media System. Politics and Power. Oxford University Press. Chambers, S. & Costain, A. (Eds.). (2001). Deliberation, Democracy and the Media. Rowman & Littlefield. Christians, C., Glasser, T., McQuail, D., Nordenstreng, K. & White, R. (2009). Normative Theories of the Press. Journalism in Democratic Societies. University of Illinois Press. Commission on Freedom of the Press (1947). A Free and Responsible Press. University of Chicago Press. Cunningham, S. & Craig, D. (2019). Social Media Entertainment. The New Intersection of Hollywood and Silicon Valley. NYU Press. Deuze, M. (2002). Journalists in the Netherlands. Aksant Academic. Deuze, M. (2005). What is Journalism? Professional Identity and Ideology of Journalists Reconsidered. Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism, 6(4), 442–464. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884905056815 Delli Carpini, M. X. & Keeter, S. (1996). What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters. Yale University Press. Donohue, G. A., Tichenor, P. J. & Olien, C. N. (1995). A Guard Dog Perspective on the Role of the Media. Journal of Communication, 45(2), 115–132. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1995.tb00732.x Donsbach, W. (1983). Journalists’ Conceptions of their Audience: Comparative Indicators for the Way British and German Journalists Define their Relations to the Public. International Communication Gazette, 32(1), 19–36. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/001654928303200102 Donsbach, W. & Patterson, T. (2004). Political News Journalists: Partisanship, Professionalism, and Political Roles in Five Countries. In F. Esser & B. Pfetsch (Eds.), Comparing Political Communication. Theories, Cases, and Challenges (pp. 251–270). Cambridge University Press. Esser, F. (1999). “Tabloidization” of News: A Comparative Analysis of Anglo-American and German Press Journalism. European Journal of Communication, 14(3), 291–324. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323199014003001 Esser, F. (2008). Dimensions of Political News Cultures: Sound Bite and Image Bite News in France, Germany, Great Britain and the United States. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 13(4), 401–428. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161208323691 Fletcher, R. & Nielsen, R. K. (2017a). Are News Audiences Increasingly Fragmented? A Cross-National Comparative Analysis of Cross-Platform News Audience Fragmentation and Duplication. Journal of Communication, 67(4), 476–498. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12315 Fletcher, R. & Nielsen, R. K. (2017b). Are People Incidentally Exposed to News on Social Media? A Comparative Analysis. New Media & Society, 20(7), 2450–2468. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817724170 Franklin, B., Hamer, M., Hanna, M., Kinsey, M. & Richardson, J. E. (2005). Watchdog Journalism. In Key Concepts in Journalism Studies (pp. 274–274). Sage. Online: https://www.doi.org/10.4135/9781446215821 Gil de Zúñiga, H. & Zicheng, C. (2021). Origin and evolution of the News Finds Me perception: Review of theory and effects. El Profesional de la información, 30(3). Online: https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2021.may.21 Goldman, S. & Mutz, D. (2011). The Friendly Media Phenomenon: A Cross-National Analysis of Cross-Cutting Exposure. Political Communication, 28(1), 42–66. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2010.544280 Hallin, D. C. & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing Media Systems. Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge University Press. Hallin, D. C. & Mancini, P. (2012). Comparing Media Systems: A Response to Critics. In J. Hardy (Ed.), Handbook of Comparative Communication Research (pp. 207–220). Routledge. Hallin, D. C. & Mancini, P. (2017). Ten Years After Comparing Media Systems: What Have We Learned? Political Communication, 34(2), 155–171. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2016.1233158 Hampton, M. (2009). The Fourth Estate Ideal in Journalism History. In S. Allan (Ed.), The Routledge Companion to News and Journalism (pp. 3–12). Routledge. Hanitzsch, T. (2007). Deconstructing Journalism Culture: Toward a Universal Theory. Communication Theory, 17(4), 367–385. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00303.x Hanitzsch, T. (2011). Populist Disseminators, Detached Watchdogs, Critical Change Agents and Opportunist Facilitators: Professional Milieus, the Journalistic Field and Autonomy in 18 Countries. International Communication Gazette, 73(6), 477–494. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048511412279 Hanitzsch, T., Hanusch, F., Mellado, C., Anikina, M., Berganza, R., Cangoz, I., Coman, M., Hamada, B., Hernández, M. E., Karadjov, C. D., Moreira, S. V., Mwesige, P. G., Lee Plaisance, P., Reich, Z., Seethaler, J., Skewes, E. A., Vardiansyah Noor, D. & Kee Wang Yuen, E. (2011). Mapping Journalism Cultures across Nations: A Comparative Study of 18 Countries. Journalism Studies, 12(3), 273–293. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2010.512502 Hanusch, F. (2012). Broadening the Focus: The case for lifestyle journalism as a field of scholarly inquiry. Journalism Practice, 6(1), 2–11. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2011.622895 Hartley, J. (1996). Popular Reality. Journalism, Modernity and Popular Culture. Arnold. Henkel, I., Thurman, N. & Deffner, V. (2019). Comparing Journalism Cultures in Britain and Germany: Confrontation, Contextualization, Conformity. Journalism Studies, 20(14), 1995–2013. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2018.1551067 Jandura, O. & Friedrich, K. (2014). The Quality of Media Coverage. In C. Reinemann (Ed.), Handbooks of Communication Science. Political Communication (pp. 351–373). De Gruyter Mouton. Johnstone, J., Slawski, E. & Bowman, W. (1976). The News People. A Sociological Portrait of American Journalists and Their Work. University of Illinois Press. Kepplinger, H. M., Brosius, H. B. & Staab, J. F. (1991). Instrumental Actualization: A Theory of Mediated Conflicts. European Journal of Communication, 6(3), 263–290. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323191006003002 Kovach, B. & Rosenstiel, T. (2001). The Elements of Journalism. What Newspeople Should Know and the Public Should Expect. Crown Publishers. Kristensen, L. M. & Bro, P. (2024). News values in a digital age – Intra-media, inter-media, and extra-media platforms. Journalism, 25(4), 819–836. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849231165855 Lasswell, H. D. (1948). The Structure and Function of Communication in Society. In L. Bryson (Ed.), The Communication of Ideas (pp. 37–51). Harper and Row. Lee, T. (2010). Why They Don’t Trust the Media: An Examination of Factors Predicting Trust. American Behavioral Scientist, 54(1), 8–21. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764210376308 Majó-Vázquez, S., Nielsen, R. K. & González-Bailón, S. (2018). The Backbone Structure of Audience Networks: A New Approach to Comparing Online News Consumption across Countries. Political Communication, 36(2), 227–240. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2018.1546244 Martínez-Costa, M. P., Serrano-Puche, J., Portilla Manjón, I. & Sánchez-Blanco, C. (2019). Young adults’ interaction with online news and advertising. Comunicar, (59), 19–28. Online: https://doi.org/10.3916/C59-2019-02 Márquez-Ramírez, M., Mellado, C., Humanes, M. L., Amado, A., Beck, D., Davydov, S., Mick, J., Mothes, C., Olivera, D., Panagiotu, N., Roses, S., Silke, H., Sparks, C., Stępińska, A., Szabó, G., Tandoc, E. & Wang, H. (2020). Detached or Interventionist? Comparing the Performance of Watchdog Journalism in Transitional, Advanced and Non-democratic Countries. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 25(1), 53–75. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161219872155 Martín Algarra, M., Torregrosa, M. & Serrano-Puche, J. (2010). Un periodismo sin periodos: actualidad y tiempo en la era digital. In Periodística y web 2.0: hacia la construcción de un nuevo modelo. Sociedad Española de Periodística. McNair, B. (2008). Journalism and Democracy. In K. Wahl-Jorgensen & T. Hanitzsch (Eds.), The Handbook of Journalism Studies (pp. 257–269). Routledge. McQuail, D. (1992). Media Performance. Mass Communication and the Public Interest. Sage. McQuail, D. (2013). Journalism and Society. Sage. Mellado, C. (2019). Journalists’ Professional Roles and Role Performance. In J. F. Nussbaum (Ed.), The Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication (pp. 1–23). Oxford University Press. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.832 Mellado, C., Hellmueller, L. & Donsbach, W. (Eds.). (2016). Journalistic Role Performance. Concepts, Contexts, and Methods. Taylor & Francis. Mellado, C., Hellmueller, L. & Weaver, D. (2016). Revisiting Journalists’ Role Conceptions Research. In C. Mellado, L. Hellmueller & D. Weaver (Eds.), Journalistic Role Performance (pp. 39–58). Routledge. Moran, R. E. & Nechushtai, E. (2023). Before reception: Trust in the news as infrastructure. Journalism, 24(3), 457–474. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849211048961 Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Schulz, A., Andi S., Robertson, C. & Nielsen, R. K. (2021). Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2021. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. Nielsen, R. K. & Ganter, S. A. (2018). Dealing with digital intermediaries: A case study of the relations between publishers and platforms. New Media & Society, 20(4), 1600–1617. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817701318 Norris, P. (2014). Watchdog Journalism. In M. Bovens, R. Goodie & T. Schillemans (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability (pp. 525–541). Oxford University Press. Novoa Jaso, M. F., Sánchez-Aranda, J. J. & Serrano-Puche, J. (2019). De la Redacción a la (gran) pantalla: roles profesionales del periodismo y su representación en la ficción audiovisual [From the newsroom to the big screen: Professional roles of journalism and their representation in audiovisual fiction]. ICONO 14, 17(2), 32–58. Online: https://doi.org/10.7195/ri14.v17i2.1368 Pateman, C. (1970). Participation and democratic theory. Cambridge University Press. Peters, C. & Broersma, M. (Eds.). (2013). Rethinking Journalism. Trust and Participation in a Transformed News Landscape. Routledge. Peters, C. & Broersma, M. (Eds.). (2017). Rethinking Journalism Again. Societal Role and Public Relevance in a Digital Age. Routledge. Peters, C. & Schrøder, K. C. (2018). Beyond the Here and Now of News Audiences: A Process-Based Framework for Investigating News Repertoires. Journal of Communication, 68(6), 1079–1103. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqy060 Peters, C. & Witschge, T. (2015). From Grand Narratives of Democracy to Small Expectations of Participation. Journalism Practice, 9(1), 19–34. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2014.928455 Peterson, T. (1956). The Social Responsibility Theory of the Press. In F. Siebert, T. Peterson & W. Schramm (Eds.), Four Theories of the Press (pp. 73–103). University of Illinois Press. Prager, A. & Hameleers, M. (2021). Disseminating information or advocating peace? Journalists’ role perceptions in the face of conflict. Journalism, 22(2), 395–413. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884918791788 Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism (2023). Digital News Report 2023. University of Oxford. Online: https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/digital-news-report/2023 Rodríguez-Virgili, J., Sierra, A. & Serrano-Puche, J. (2022). Motivations for News Exposure in Different Media Systems: A Comparative Study of Germany, Spain and the United Kingdom. Communication Today, 13(1), 60–73. Scheuer, J. (2008). The Big Picture. Why Democracies Need Journalistic Excellence. Routledge. Schudson, M. (2008). Why Democracies Need an Unlovable Press. Polity. Schultz, J. (1998). Reviving the Fourth Estate. Democracy, Accountability and the Media. Cambridge University Press. Online: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511597138 Serrano-Puche, J., Fernández, C. B. & Rodríguez-Virgili, J. (2018). Información política y exposición incidental en las redes sociales: un análisis de Argentina, Chile, España y México [Political information and incidental exposure in social media: the cases of Argentina, Chile, Spain and Mexico]. Doxa Comunicación, (27), 19–42. Online: https://doi.org/10.31921/doxacom.n27a1 Serrano-Puche, J., Rodríguez-Salcedo, N. & Martínez-Costa, M.-P. (2023). Trust, disinformation, and digital media: Perceptions and expectations about news in a polarized environment. Profesional de la información, 32(5). Online: https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2023.sep.18 Sierra, A., Serrano-Puche, J. & Rodríguez-Virgili, J. (2023). Perceptions of journalism and trust in news among traditionalist and digitalist media users: A comparative analysis of Denmark, Spain and USA. Anàlisi: Quaderns de Comunicació i Cultura, 68, 7–25. Online: https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/analisi.3585 Starck, K. & Soloski, J. (1977). Effect of Reporter Predisposition in Covering Controversial Stories. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 54(1), 120–125. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/107769907705400117 Steppat, D., Castro Herrero, L. & Esser, F. (2020). News media performance evaluated by national audiences: How media environments and user preferences matter. Media and Communication, 8(3), 321–334. Online: https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i3.3091 Steppat, D., Castro Herrero, L. & Esser, F. (2021). Selective Exposure in Different Political Information Environments – How Media Fragmentation and Polarization Shape Congruent News Use. European Journal of Communication, 37(1), 82–102. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/02673231211012141 Stier, S., Kirkizh, N., Froio, C. & Schroeder, R. (2020). Populist Attitudes and Selective Exposure to Online News: A Cross-Country Analysis Combining Web Tracking and Surveys. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 25(3), 426–446. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161220907018 Strömbäck, J. & Luengo, O. G. (2008). Polarized Pluralist and Democratic Corporatist Models: A Comparison of Election News Coverage in Spain and Sweden. International Communication Gazette, 70(6), 547–562. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048508096398 Strömbäck, J., Ørsten, M. & Aalberg, T. (2008). Communicating Politics. Political Communication in the Nordic Countries. University of Gothenburg. Swart, J., Peters, C. & Broersma, M. (2018): Shedding light on the dark social: The connective role of news and journalism in social media communities. New Media & Society, 20(11), 4329–4345. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818772063 Toff, B. & Nielsen, R. K. (2018). “I Just Google It”: Folk Theories of Distributed Discovery. Journal of Communication, 68(3), 636–657. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqy009 Tong, J. (2018). Journalistic Legitimacy Revisited: Collapse or Revival in the Digital Age? Digital Journalism, 6(2), 256–273. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1360785 Torregrosa, M. & Gutiérrez, R. (2009). Saber y poder en los profesionales de la comunicación. Una aproximación al concepto de autoridad desde la epistemología de la comunicación. Palabra Clave, 12(2), 287–299. Online: https://palabraclave.unisabana.edu.co/index.php/palabraclave/article/view/1566 Vos, T. P., Eichholz, M. & Karaliova, T. (2019). Audiences and Journalistic Capital. Roles of Journalism. Journalism Studies, 20(7), 1009–1027. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2018.1477551 Waisbord, S. (2000). Watchdog Journalism in South America. Columbia University Press. Ward, S. J. (2009). Journalism Ethics. In K. Wahl-Jorgensen & T. Hanitzsch (Eds.), The Handbook of Journalism Studies (pp. 295–309). Routledge. Weaver, D. (1999). Las actitudes profesionales de los periodistas en un contexto global. Communication & Society, 12(2), 33–45. Weaver, D. H. & Willnat, L. (2012). The Global Journalist in the 21st Century. Routledge. Weaver, D. H. & Wilhoit, G. C. (1996). The American Journalist in the 1990s. U.S. News People at the End of an Era. Psychology Press. Willnat, L., Weaver, D. H. & Wilhoit, G. C. (2019). The American Journalist in the Digital Age. How Journalists and the Public Think about Journalism in the United States. Journalism Studies, 20(3), 423–441. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2017.1387071 Wolling, J. (2009). The Effect of Subjective Quality Assessment on Media Selection. In T. Hartmann (Ed.), Media Choice (pp. 84–101). Routledge. " ["copyrightYear"]=> int(2024) ["issueId"]=> int(593) ["licenseUrl"]=> string(43) "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0" ["pages"]=> string(7) "69–89" ["pub-id::doi"]=> string(19) "10.17646/KOME.of.14" ["abstract"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(1101) "

This study compares news users’ perceptions of journalism in Germany, Spain and the United Kingdom. Two cross-national surveys were conducted, each with over 2,000 participants in the respective countries. The surveys examined users’ evaluations of journalism’s relevance to society and its fulfilment of three key functions: holding the powerful to account, rapidly disseminating information to the public and providing analysis of current affairs. The findings highlight a gap between the social importance attributed to journalism and satisfaction with media performance. Information dissemination is perceived as the most effectively achieved function, while functions requiring more watchdog or analytical efforts receive less recognition in media activity. Age and education level are influential socio-demographic variables in news users’ perceptions. Older respondents and those with higher education levels view journalism as more relevant. Finally, Germany places a higher importance on journalism compared to Spain, with the United Kingdom occupying an intermediate position.

" } ["copyrightHolder"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(61) "Javier Serrano-Puche, Aurken Sierra, Jordi Rodríguez-Virgili" } ["subtitle"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(55) "An Assessment of News Users in Three European Countries" } ["title"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(57) "Perceptions of Journalism in a Cross-National Perspective" } ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["authors"]=> array(3) { [0]=> object(Author)#902 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(15) { ["id"]=> int(9742) ["email"]=> string(16) "jserrano@unav.es" ["includeInBrowse"]=> bool(true) ["publicationId"]=> int(7734) ["seq"]=> int(3) ["userGroupId"]=> int(339) ["country"]=> string(2) "ES" ["orcid"]=> string(37) "https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6633-5303" ["url"]=> string(0) "" ["affiliation"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(52) "School of Communication of the University of Navarra" } ["biography"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" } ["familyName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(13) "Serrano-Puche" } ["givenName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(13) "Serrano-Puche" } ["preferredPublicName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(20) "Javier Serrano-Puche" } ["submissionLocale"]=> string(5) "en_US" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } [1]=> object(Author)#899 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(15) { ["id"]=> int(9743) ["email"]=> string(14) "aurken@unav.es" ["includeInBrowse"]=> bool(true) ["publicationId"]=> int(7734) ["seq"]=> int(3) ["userGroupId"]=> int(339) ["country"]=> string(2) "ES" ["orcid"]=> string(37) "https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1749-7888" ["url"]=> string(0) "" ["affiliation"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(52) "School of Communication of the University of Navarra" } ["biography"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" } ["familyName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(6) "Sierra" } ["givenName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(6) "Aurken" } ["preferredPublicName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(13) "Aurken Sierra" } ["submissionLocale"]=> string(5) "en_US" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } [2]=> object(Author)#895 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(15) { ["id"]=> int(9744) ["email"]=> string(17) "jrvirgili@unav.es" ["includeInBrowse"]=> bool(true) ["publicationId"]=> int(7734) ["seq"]=> int(3) ["userGroupId"]=> int(339) ["country"]=> string(2) "ES" ["orcid"]=> string(37) "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7952-5664" ["url"]=> string(0) "" ["affiliation"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(52) "School of Communication of the University of Navarra" } ["biography"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" } ["familyName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(18) "Rodríguez-Virgili" } ["givenName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(5) "Jordi" } ["preferredPublicName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(24) "Jordi Rodríguez-Virgili" } ["submissionLocale"]=> string(5) "en_US" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } ["keywords"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> array(5) { [0]=> string(10) "journalism" [1]=> string(17) "media performance" [2]=> string(18) "professional roles" [3]=> string(10) "news users" [4]=> string(20) "comparative analysis" } } ["subjects"]=> array(0) { } ["disciplines"]=> array(0) { } ["languages"]=> array(0) { } ["supportingAgencies"]=> array(0) { } ["galleys"]=> array(1) { [0]=> object(ArticleGalley)#896 (7) { ["_submissionFile"]=> NULL ["_data"]=> array(9) { ["submissionFileId"]=> int(36173) ["id"]=> int(5963) ["isApproved"]=> bool(false) ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["label"]=> string(3) "PDF" ["publicationId"]=> int(7734) ["seq"]=> int(0) ["urlPath"]=> string(0) "" ["urlRemote"]=> string(0) "" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(true) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) }

object(Publication)#763 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(29) { ["id"]=> int(7351) ["accessStatus"]=> int(0) ["datePublished"]=> string(10) "2024-10-14" ["lastModified"]=> string(19) "2024-10-14 14:50:58" ["primaryContactId"]=> int(9184) ["sectionId"]=> int(133) ["seq"]=> int(4) ["submissionId"]=> int(7227) ["status"]=> int(3) ["version"]=> int(1) ["categoryIds"]=> array(0) { } ["citationsRaw"]=> string(13834) "Acosta, M. (2020). Activismo feminista en Instagram. El caso de la Campaña Nacional por el Derecho al Aborto Legal Seguro y Gratuito en Argentina. Perspectivas de la Comunicación, 13(1), 29–46. Online: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-48672020000100029 Aministía Internacional (2020). Corazones verdes: Violencia online contra las mujeres durante el debate por la legalización del aborto en Argentina. Amnistía Internacional. Online: https://amnistia.org.ar/corazonesverdes/informe-corazones-verdes Aragón, A. (2017, August 8). ‘Feminazis’: el origen de la palabra con la que se ataca a las feministas. Cadenaser. https://cadenaser.com/ser/2017/08/08/sociedad/1502213464_385523.html Bajo Pérez, I. & Gutiérrez San Miguel, M. B. (2022). Ciberviolencias machistas en Instagram: Relación entre la violencia recibida y el contenido compartido. IC Revista Científica De Información Y Comunicación, (19), 211–236. Online: https://doi.org/10.12795/IC.2022.I19.10 Biroli, F. & Caminotti, M. (2020). The Conservative Backlash against Gender in Latin America. Politics & Gender, 16(1), E1. Online: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X20000045 Blais, M. & Dupuis-Déri, F. (2012). Masculinism and the Antifeminist Countermovement. Social Movement Studies, 11(1), 21–39. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2012.640532 Blommaert, J. (2018). Online-offline Modes of Identity and Community: Elliot Rodger’s Twisted World of Masculine Victimhood. In M. Hoondert, P. Mutsaers & W. Arfman (Eds.), Cultural Practices of Victimhood (pp. 193–213). Routledge. Bonet-Martí, J. (2020). Análisis de las estrategias discursivas empleadas en la construcción de discurso antifeminista en redes sociales. Psicoperspectivas, 19(3). Online: https://doi.org/10.5027/psicoperspectivasvol19-issue3-fulltext-2040 Carter Olson, C. S. & LaPoe, V. (2017). “Feminazis,” “Libtards,” “Snowflakes,” and “Racists”: Trolling and the Spiral of Silence Effect in Women, LGBTQIA Communities, and Disability Populations before and after the 2016 Election. Journal of Public Interest Communications, 1(2), 116–132. Online: https://doi.org/10.32473/jpic.v1.i2.p116 Chávez, G., Del Pozo, F. & Vargas, L. (2021). Matices del feminismo: Estrategias y colores del discurso feminista en Instagram. En Universidad de Lima, Facultad de Comunicación (Ed.), Concurso de Investigación en Comunicación: trabajos ganadores (14.a ed., pp. 203–268). Universidad de Lima. Darius, P. & Stephany, F. (2022). How the Far-Right Polarises Twitter: ‘Hashjacking’ as a Disinformation Strategy in Times of COVID-19. In R. M. Benito, C. Cherifi, H. Cherifi, E. Moro, L. M. Rocha & M. Sales-Pardo (Eds.), Complex Networks & Their Applications. Studies in Computational Intelligence (pp. 100–111). Springer. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93413-2_9 Dickel, V. & Evolvi, G. (2023). “Victims of Feminism”: Exploring Networked Misogyny and #MeToo in the Manosphere. Feminist Media Studies, 23(4), 1392–1408. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2022.2029925 Dignam, P. A. & Rohlinger, D. A. (2019). Misogynistic Men Online: How the Red Pill Helped Elect Trump. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 44(3), 589–612. Engler, V. (2017). Antifeminismo Online. Nueva Sociedad, (269), 78–88. Fairclough, N. (2015). Language and Power (3rd ed.). Routledge. Freelon, D., Marwick, A. & Kreiss, D. (2020). False Equivalencies: Online Activism from Left to Right. Science, 369(6508), 1197–1201. Online: https://doi.org/10.1126/SCIENCE.ABB2428 Gamir-Ríos, J., Tarullo, R. & Ibáñez-Cuquerella, M. (2021). Multimodal disinformation about otherness on the internet. The spread of racist, xenophobic and Islamophobic fake news in 2020. Anàlisi, (64), 49–64. Online: https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/analisi.3398 Gamir-Ríos, J. & Tarullo, R. (2022). Predominio de las cheapfakes en redes sociales. Complejidad técnica y funciones textuales de la desinformación desmentida en Argentina durante 2020. AdComunica. Revista Científica de Estrategias, Tendencias e Innovación en Comunicación, (23), 97–118. Online: https://doi.org/10.6035/adcomunica.6299 García-Mingo, E. & Diaz-Fernandez, S. (2023). Mapping Research on Online Misogyny and Manosphere in Spain: The Way Ahead. Masculinities & Social Change, 12(3), 293–309. Online: https://doi.org/10.17583/mcs.11882 Giannoulakis, S. & Tsapatsoulis, N. (2016). Evaluating the Descriptive Power of Instagram Hashtags. Journal of Innovation in Digital Ecosystems, 3(2), 114–129. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jides.2016.10.001 Giaxoglou, K. (2018). #JeSuisCharlie? Hashtags as Narrative Resources in Contexts of Ecstatic Sharing. Discourse, Context and Media, (22), 13–20. Online: https://doi.org/0.1016/j.dcm.2017.07.006 Ging, D. (2019). Alphas, Betas, and Incels: Theorizing the Masculinities of the Manosphere. Men and Masculinities, 22(4), 638–657. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X17706401 Ging, D. & Siapera, E. (2018). Special Issue on Online Misogyny. Feminist Media Studies, 18(4), 515–524. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2018.1447345 Gotell, L. & Dutton, E. (2016). Sexual Violence in the ‘Manosphere’: Antifeminist Men’s Rights Discourses on Rape. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 5(2), 65–80. Online: https://doi.org/10.5204/ijcjsd.v5i2.310 Gutiérrez, M., Pando, M. J. & Congosto M. (2020). Nuevos enfoques en la propagación de la reacción antifeminista en Twitter. Investigaciones Feministas, 11(2), 221–237. Online: https://doi.org/10.5209/infe.66089 Halpin, M. (2022). Weaponized Subordination: How Incels Discredit Themselves to Degrade Women. Gender & Society, 36(6), 813–837. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/08912432221128545 Han, X. & Yin, C. (2023). Mapping the Manosphere. Categorization of Reactionary Masculinity Discourses in Digital Environment. Feminist Media Studies, 23(5), 1923–1940. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2021.1998185 Heritage, F. (2023). Incels and Ideologies: Exploring How Incels Use Language to Construct Gender and Race. Cham: Springer Nature. Hunt, J. (1996). Abortion and Nazism: Is There Really a Connection? The Linacre Quarterly, 63(4), 53–63. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/20508549.1999.11878366 Krendel, A. (2020). The Men and Women, Guys and Girls of the ‘Manosphere’: A Corpus-assisted Discourse Approach. Discourse & Society, 31(6), 607–630. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926520939690 Krendel, A., McGlashan, M. & Koller, V. (2022). The Representation of Gendered Social Actors across Five Manosphere Communities on Reddit. Corpora, 17(2), 291–321. Online: https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2022.0257 Laudano, C. (2018). #8M Paro internacional de mujeres. Reflexiones en torno a la apropiación feminista de TIC. In S. Lago Martínez, A. Álvarez, M. Gendler & A. Méndez (Eds.), Acerca de la apropiación de tecnologías : Teoría, estudios y debates (pp. 121–130). Buenos Aires. Liang, S. & Wolfe, J. (2022). Getting a Feel of Instagram Reels: The Effects of Posting Format on Online Engagement. Journal of Student Research, 11(4). Online: https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v11i4.3600 Lopes Miranda, S. (2023). Analyzing Hate Speech against Women on Instagram. Open Information Science, 7(1). Online: https://doi.org/10.1515/opis-2022-0161 Mantilla, K. (2013). Gendertrolling: Misogyny Adapts to New Media. Feminist Studies, 39(2), 563–570. Online: https://doi.org/10.1353/fem.2013.0039 McCarthy, L. & Taylor, S. (2024). Misogyny and Organization Studies. Organization Studies, 45(3), 457–473. https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406231213964 Murumaa-Mengel, M. & Muuli, M. (2021). Misogynist Content Exposé Pages on Instagram: Five Types of Shamings, Moderators and Audience Members. Participations: Journal of Audience and Reception Studies, 18(2), 100−123. Mushaben, M. J. (2007). Coming to Terms with the Past and Present: Memory, Gender and German Studies. German Politics, 16(3), 317–325. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/09644000701532684 Noriega, C. A. & Iribarren, F. J. (2013). Towards an Empirical Analysis of Hate Speech on Commercial Talk Radio. Harvard Journal of Hispanic Policy, 25, 69–96. Online: https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A412800595/AONE?u=univ&sid=bookmark-AONE&xid=5f707341 Norris, P. & Inglehart, R. (2019). Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit, and Authoritarian Populism. Cambridge University Press. Núñez Puente, S., D’Antonio Maceiras, S. & Fernández Romero, D. (2019). Twitter Activism and Ethical Witnessing: Possibilities and Challenges of Feminist Politics against Gender-based Violence. Social Science Computer Review, 39(2), 295–311. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439319864898 Núñez Puente, S., Fernández Romero, D. & D’Antonio Maceiras, S. (2021). New Discourses of Masculinity in the Context of Online Misogyny in Spain: The Use of the “Feminazi” and “Gender Ideology” Concepts on Twitter Media Representations and Narratives of Masculinities Across Europe. Socialni Studia [Social Studies], 18(2), 49–66. Online: https://doi.org/10.5817/SOC2021-2-49 Palau Sampio, D. & Carratalá, A. (2022). Injecting Disinformation into Public Space: Pseudo-media and Reality-altering Narratives. Profesional De La información, 31(3). Online: https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2022.may.12 Pariser, E. (2017). El filtro burbuja: cómo la web decide lo que leemos y lo que pensamos. Taurus. Plath, H., Paiva, M., Pinto, D. & Costa, P. (2022). Detecção de Discurso de Ódio Contra Mulheres em Textos em Português Brasileiro: Construção da Base MINA-BR e Modelo de Classificação. Revista Eletrônica De Iniciação Científica Em Computação, 20(3). Online: https://journals-sol.sbc.org.br/index.php/reic/article/view/2696 Rodríguez Ponce, M. I. (2022). TERF: Insult or Meme? Ideological Bias in Critical Discourse Analysis. Verba Hispanica, 30(1), 173–193. Online: https://doi.org/10.4312/vh.30.1.173-193 Rogowski, J. C. & Sutherland, J. L. (2016). How Ideology Fuels Affective Polarization. Political Behavior, 38, 485–508. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-015-9323-7 Santos, F. P., Lelkes, Y. & Levin, S.A. (2021). Link Recommendation Algorithms and Dynamics of Polarization in Online Social Networks. PNAS, 118(50), 1–9. Online: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2102141118 Schmitz, R. M. & Kazyak, E. (2016). Masculinities in Cyberspace: An Analysis of Portrayals of Manhood in Men’s Rights Activist Websites. Social Sciences, 5(2), 18. Online: https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci5020018 Sigma Dos (2021). Discursos de odio sexistas en redes sociales y entornos digitales. Madrid: Centro Reina Sofía sobre Adolescencia y Juventud – FAD. Online: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4580436 Simancas González, E., Galarza Fernández, E. & Sánchez-Labella Martín, I. (2023). Ilustrar el feminismo en Instagram. Las redes sociales como escenario de la agenda feminista. Espejo de Monografías de Comunicación Social, (16), 49–73. Online: https://doi.org/10.52495/c2.emcs.16.cyg1 Soares, F. B. & Recuero, R. (2021). Hashtag Wars: Political Disinformation and Discursive Struggles on Twitter Conversations During the 2018 Brazilian Presidential Campaign. Social Media + Society, 7(2). Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211009073 Sued, G. (2023). Visibilidades algorítmicas del feminismo en plataformas sociales. Zona Franca, (31), 70–101. Online: https://doi.org/10.35305/zf.vi31.362 Sunstein, C. (2003). Republic.com. Internet, democracia y libertad. Paidós. Tarullo, R. & Frezzotti, Y. (2022). Hashtivismo desinformativo: el negacionismo de la dictadura argentina en Instagram. Comunicación Y Medios, 31(46), 24–39. Online: https://doi.org/10.5354/0719-1529.2022.66765 Tarullo, R. y García, M. (2020). Hashtivismo feminista en Instagram: #NiñasNoMadres de@actrices. argentinas. Dígitos. Revista de Comunicación Digital, (6), 31–54. Online: https://doi.org/10.7203/rd.v1i6.172 Tortajada, I., Comas D’Argemir i Cendra, D. & Martínez Corcuera, R. (2014). Inmigración, crisis económica y discursos radiofónicos: Hacia un lenguaje excluyente. Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico, 20(2), 899–916. Online: https://doi.org/10.5209/revESMP.2014.v20.n2.47063 Vacarezza, N. (2023). Abortion Rights in Uruguay, Chile, and Argentina: Movements Shaping Legal and Policy Change. Southwestern Journal of International Law, 29(2), 309–347. Valera-Ordaz, L., Calvo, D. & López-García, G. (2018). Conversaciones políticas en Facebook. Explorando el papel de la homofilia en la argumentación y la interacción comunicativa. Revista Latina De Comunicación Social, (73), 55–73. Online: https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2018–1245 Villar-Aguilés, A. & Pecourt Gracia, J. (2020). Antifeminismo y troleo de género en Twitter. Estudio de la subcultura trol a través de #STOPfeminazis. Teknokultura. Revista de Cultura Digital y Movimientos Sociales, 18(1), 33–44. Online: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/7739317.pdf Wachowski, Lana & Wachowski, Lilly [directors] (1999). The Matrix [film]. Warner Brothers. Williams, Z. (2015, September 15). Feminazi: The Go-to Term for Trolls Out to Silence Women. The Guardian. Online: www.theguardian.com/world/2015/sep/15/feminazi-go-to-term-for-trolls-out-to-silence-womencharlotte-proudman Wodak, R. (2021). The Politics of Fear: The Shameless Normalization of Far-Right Discourse (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications. Yang, G. (2016). Narrative Agency in Hashtag Activism: The Case of #BlackLivesMatter. Media and Communication, 4(4), 13–17. Online: https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v4i4.692 Zafra, R. (2015). Ciberfeminismo. Bases y propuestas en un mundo global. Mujer y Cultura Visual. Online: https://idus.us.es/bitstream/handle/11441/26536/ciberfeminismo_bases_y_propuestas.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y" ["copyrightYear"]=> int(2024) ["issueId"]=> int(593) ["licenseUrl"]=> string(43) "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0" ["pages"]=> string(8) "91–110" ["pub-id::doi"]=> string(19) "10.17646/KOME.of.18" ["abstract"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(1302) "

Social media platforms have become spaces for the viralisation of hate speech and misinformation. Paradoxically, tools that were once used for activism and conversation on behalf of vulnerable communities, nowadays work to gather and reproduce analogous worldviews on polarising issues. This research analyses the behaviour of the protagonists of the conversation around #feminazis on Instagram, as well as the characteristics of the content and the degree of interaction they generate. For this purpose, computational and qualitative social science methods have been applied to a sample of 9,300 posts published between 2021 and 2023. The results show disorderly participation by anonymous accounts, women and self-described feminists, social organisations, and pseudo-media. Content opposed to elective termination of pregnancy, and misogynistic messages lead the conversation, but there are also publications that attack other progressive ideologies. Disinformative content is linked to decontextualisation and manipulation of information to go viral, transnationalising hate speech towards feminism and their supporters, framed as a homogeneous group. It is concluded that this space, created by the platform itself, contributes to the enlargement and institutionalisation of the manosphere.

" } ["copyrightHolder"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(50) "Tarullo Raquel, Calvo Dafne, Iranzo-Cabrera Maria " } ["subtitle"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(82) "Hate Speech and Misinformation, the Ongoing Discourse for Enlarging the Manosphere" } ["title"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(23) "#Feminazis on Instagram" } ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["authors"]=> array(3) { [0]=> object(Author)#909 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(15) { ["id"]=> int(9184) ["email"]=> string(21) "maria.r.tarullo@uv.es" ["includeInBrowse"]=> bool(true) ["publicationId"]=> int(7351) ["seq"]=> int(4) ["userGroupId"]=> int(339) ["country"]=> string(2) "ES" ["orcid"]=> string(37) "https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2372-7571" ["url"]=> string(0) "" ["affiliation"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(24) "Universitat de València" ["hu_HU"]=> string(50) "a:1:{s:5:"en_US";s:24:"Universitat de València";}" } ["biography"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" } ["familyName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(7) "Tarullo" ["hu_HU"]=> string(7) "Tarullo" } ["givenName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(6) "Raquel" ["hu_HU"]=> string(6) "Raquel" } ["preferredPublicName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" } ["submissionLocale"]=> string(5) "en_US" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } [1]=> object(Author)#907 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(15) { ["id"]=> int(9185) ["email"]=> string(17) "dafne.calvo@uv.es" ["includeInBrowse"]=> bool(true) ["publicationId"]=> int(7351) ["seq"]=> int(4) ["userGroupId"]=> int(339) ["country"]=> string(2) "ES" ["orcid"]=> string(37) "https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0659-6792" ["url"]=> string(0) "" ["affiliation"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(24) "Universitat de València" } ["biography"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" } ["familyName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(5) "Calvo" } ["givenName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(5) "Dafne" } ["preferredPublicName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" } ["submissionLocale"]=> string(5) "en_US" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } [2]=> object(Author)#897 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(15) { ["id"]=> int(9186) ["email"]=> string(26) "maria.iranzo-cabrera@uv.es" ["includeInBrowse"]=> bool(true) ["publicationId"]=> int(7351) ["seq"]=> int(4) ["userGroupId"]=> int(339) ["country"]=> string(2) "ES" ["orcid"]=> string(37) "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6237-6041" ["url"]=> string(0) "" ["affiliation"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(24) "Universitat de València" } ["biography"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" } ["familyName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(14) "Iranzo-Cabrera" } ["givenName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(6) "Maria " } ["preferredPublicName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" } ["submissionLocale"]=> string(5) "en_US" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } ["keywords"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> array(5) { [0]=> string(8) "misogyny" [1]=> string(11) "hate speech" [2]=> string(10) "manosphere" [3]=> string(24) "feminazis disinformation" [4]=> string(9) "Instagram" } } ["subjects"]=> array(0) { } ["disciplines"]=> array(0) { } ["languages"]=> array(0) { } ["supportingAgencies"]=> array(0) { } ["galleys"]=> array(1) { [0]=> object(ArticleGalley)#906 (7) { ["_submissionFile"]=> NULL ["_data"]=> array(9) { ["submissionFileId"]=> int(36174) ["id"]=> int(6080) ["isApproved"]=> bool(false) ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["label"]=> string(3) "PDF" ["publicationId"]=> int(7351) ["seq"]=> int(0) ["urlPath"]=> string(0) "" ["urlRemote"]=> string(0) "" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(true) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) }

object(Publication)#866 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(30) { ["id"]=> int(7756) ["accessStatus"]=> int(0) ["datePublished"]=> string(10) "2024-10-14" ["lastModified"]=> string(19) "2024-10-14 14:45:22" ["primaryContactId"]=> int(9774) ["sectionId"]=> int(133) ["seq"]=> int(5) ["submissionId"]=> int(7632) ["status"]=> int(3) ["version"]=> int(1) ["categoryIds"]=> array(0) { } ["citationsRaw"]=> string(18873) "Allcott, H. & Gentzkow, M. (2017). Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 211–236. Online: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.2.211 Al-Zaman, M. S. (2021). COVID-19-Related Social Media Fake News in India. Journalism and Media, 2(1), 100–114. Online: https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia2010007 Aloqaili, A. S. (2012). The relationship between reading comprehension and critical thinking: A theoretical study. Journal of King Saud University – Languages and Translation, 24(1), 35–41. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksult.2011.01.001 Aufderheide, P. (1993). Media Literacy: A Report of the National Leadership Conference on Media Literacy. Aspen Institue. Baek, Y. M., Kang, H. & Kim, S. (2019). Fake News Should Be Regulated Because It Influences Both “Others” and “Me”: How and Why the Influence of Presumed Influence Model Should Be Extended. Mass Communication and Society, 22(3), 301–323. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2018.1562076 Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. Online: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191 Buckingham, D., Banaji, S., Carr, D., Cranmer, S. & Willet, R. (2005). The Media Literacy of Children and Young People: A Review of the Research Literature. Ofcom. Buschman, J. (2019). Good news, bad news, and fake news. Journal of Documentation, 75(1), 213–228. Online: https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-05-2018-0074 Chandra, Y. U., Surjandy & Ernawaty (2017). Higher education student behaviors in spreading fake news on social media: A case of LINE group. 2017 International Conference on Information Management and Technology (ICIMTech), 54–59. Online: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIMTech.2017.8273511 Chen, D.-T., Wu, J. & Wang, Y.-M. (2011). Unpacking New Media Literacy. Journal of Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, 9(2), 84–88. Chen, X., Sin, S.-C. J., Theng, Y.-L. & Lee, C. S. (2015). Why Students Share Misinformation on Social Media: Motivation, Gender, and Study-level Differences. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 41(5), 583–592. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2015.07.003 Chen, Y.-R. R., Hung-Baesecke, C.-J. F. & Kim, J.-N. (2017). Identifying Active Hot-Issue Communicators and Subgroup Identifiers: Examining the Situational Theory of Problem Solving. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 94(1), 124–147. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699016629371 Chen, Z. F. & Cheng, Y. (2020). Consumer response to fake news about brands on social media: The effects of self-efficacy, media trust, and persuasion knowledge on brand trust. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 29(2), 188–198. Online: https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-12-2018-2145 Chin, C. (2022, November 13). Why M’sian youths using social media for information is worrying. The Star. Online: https://www.thestar.com.my/news/education/2022/11/13/the-discourse--stick-to-reliable-sources Chin, Y. S. & Zanuddin, H. (2022). Examining fake news comments on Facebook: An application of situational theory of problem solving in content analysis. Media Asia, 49(4), 353–373. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/01296612.2022.2067945 Chon, M.-G. & Park, H. (2021). Predicting Public Support for Government Actions in a Public Health Crisis: Testing Fear, Organization-Public Relationship, and Behavioral Intention in the Framework of the Situational Theory of Problem Solving. Health Communication, 36(4), 476–486. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2019.1700439 Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Comrey, A. L. & Lee, H. B. (1992). A First Course in Factor Analysis (2nd ed.). Lawrence Reinhold. Diamantopoulos, A. & Siguaw, J. A. (2006). Formative Versus Reflective Indicators in Organizational Measure Development: A Comparison and Empirical Illustration. British Journal of Management, 17(4), 263–282. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2006.00500.x Difonzo, N. & Bordia, P. (2007). Rumor Psychology: Social and Organizational Approaches. American Psychological Association. Eristi, B. & Erdem, C. (2017). Development of a Media Literacy Skills Scale. Contemporary Educational Technology, 8(3), 249–267. Online: https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/6199 Finneman, T. & Thomas, R. J. (2018). A family of falsehoods: Deception, media hoaxes and fake news. Newspaper Research Journal, 39(3), 350–361. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/0739532918796228 Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. Online: https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312 Früh, H. (2017). Risk Perception as Media Effect. In P. Rössler, C. A. Hoffner & L. v. Zoonen (Eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Media Effects (pp. 1–8). John Wiley & Sons. Online: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118783764.wbieme0139 Funke, D. & Flamini, D. (2021). A guide to anti-misinformation actions around the world. Poynter. Online: https://www.poynter.org/ifcn/anti-misinformation-actions/#taiwan Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T. & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7–23. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640109527071 Gold, A. H., Malhotra, A. & Segars, A. H. (2001). Knowledge Management: An Organizational Capabilities Perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 185–214. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2001.11045669 González-Cabrera, C., Ugalde, C., Figueroa, C. & Pesántez, J. (2019). The Impact of Media Literacy on the Intention to Share Fake Information in Social Networks. EDULEARN19 Proceedings, 7123–7131. Online: https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2019.1702 Grunig, J. E. (1997). A situational theory of publics: Conceptual history, recent challenges and new research. In D. Moss, T. MacManus & D. Vercic (Eds.), Public Relations Research: An International Perspective (pp. 3–46). ITB Press. Grunig, J. E. & Hunt, T. (1984). Managing Public Relations. Cengage Learning. Gu, L., Kropotov, V. & Yarochkin, F. (2017). The fake news machine: How propagandists abuse the internet and manipulate the public. Trend Micro. Online: https://documents.trendmicro.com/assets/white_papers/wp-fake-news-machine-how-propagandists-abuse-the-internet.pdf Haciyakupoglu, G., Yang, J. H., Suguna, V. S., Leong, D. & Rahman, M. F. B. A. (2018). Countering fake news: A survey of recent global initiatives. Online: https://www.rsis.edu.sg/rsis-publication/cens/countering-fake-news-a-survey-of-recent-global-initiatives/#.XKRKFKRS_IU Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M. & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. Online: https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203 Hair, J. F. J., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). Sage Publications. Hassan, S. F. (2017, October 23). Government portal sebenarnya.my an online hit. New Straits Times. Online: https://www.nst.com.my/news/nation/2017/10/294045/government-portal-sebenarnyamy-online-hit Hinsley, A. & Holton, A. (2021). Fake news cues: Examining the impact of content, source, and typology of news cues on people’s confidence in identifying mis- and disinformation. International Journal of Communication, 15, 4984–5003. Online: https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/12387/3605 Hipple, N. K., McGarrell, E. F., O’Brien, M. & Huebner, B. M. (2017). Gun crime incident reviews as a strategy for enhancing problem solving and information sharing. Journal of Crime and Justice, 40(1), 50–67. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2016.1155303 Hofstetter, C. R., Zuniga, S. & Dozier, D. M. (2001). Media Self-Efficacy: Validation of a New Concept. Mass Communication and Society, 4(1), 61–76. Online: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0401_05 Jack, C. (2017). Lexicon of Lies: Terms for Problematic Information. Data & Society Research Institute. Online: https://datasociety.net/output/lexicon-of-lies/ Jiang, H., Kim, J.-N., Liu, B. & Luo, Y. (2019). The Impact of Perceptual and Situational Factors on Environmental Communication: A Study of Citizen Engagement in China. Environmental Communication, 13(5), 582–602. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2017.1346517 Kahne, J. & Bowyer, B. (2017). Educating for Democracy in a Partisan Age: Confronting the Challenges of Motivated Reasoning and Misinformation. American Educational Research Journal, 54(1), 3–34. Online: https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216679817 Kean, L. G., Prividera, L. C., Boyce, A. & Curry, T. (2012). Media Use, Media Literacy, and African American Females’ Food Consumption Patterns. Howard Journal of Communications, 23(3), 197–214. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/10646175.2012.641874 Khairunissa, K. (2020). University students’ ability in evaluating fake news on social media. Record and Library Journal, 6(2), 136–145. Online: https://doi.org/10.20473/rlj.V6-I2.2020.136-145 Kim, J.-N. & Grunig, J. E. (2011). Problem Solving and Communicative Action: A Situational Theory of Problem Solving. Journal of Communication, 61(1), 120–149. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01529.x Kim, J.-N., Shen, H. & Morgan, S. E. (2011). Information Behaviors and Problem Chain Recognition Effect: Applying Situational Theory of Problem Solving in Organ Donation Issues. Health Communication, 26(2), 171–184. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2010.544282 Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press. Knuutila, A., Neudert, L.-M. & Howard, P. N. (2022). Who is afraid of fake news? Modeling risk perceptions of misinformation in 142 countries. Harvard Kennedy School (HKS) Misinformation Review, 3(3). Online: https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-97 Koc, M. & Barut, E. (2016). Development and validation of New Media Literacy Scale (NMLS) for university students. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 834–843. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.035 Kohen, Z., Amram, M., Dagan, M. & Miranda, T. (2019). Self-efficacy and problem-solving skills in mathematics: The effect of instruction-based dynamic versus static visualization. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(4), 759–778. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1683588 Krishna, A. (2018). Poison or Prevention? Understanding the Linkages between Vaccine-Negative Individuals’ Knowledge Deficiency, Motivations, and Active Communication Behaviors. Health Communication, 33(9), 1088–1096. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2017.1331307 Lee, T. (2021). How people perceive influence of fake news and why it matters. Communication Quarterly, 69(4), 431–453. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2021.1954677 Lee, Y. (2020). A Situational Perspective on Employee Communicative Behaviors in a Crisis: The Role of Relationship and Symmetrical Communication. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 14(2), 89–104. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2020.1720691 Leeder, C. (2019). How college students evaluate and share “fake news” stories. Library & Information Science Research, 41(3), 100967. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2019.100967 Lister, M., Dovey, J., Giddings, S., Grant, I. & Kelly, K. (2009). New Media: A Critical Introduction (2nd ed.). Routledge. Literat, I. (2014). Measuring New Media Literacies: Towards the Development of a Comprehensive Assessment Tool. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 6(1), 15–27. Liu, B. F., Xu, S., Lim, J. R. & Egnoto, M. (2019). How publics’ active and passive communicative behaviors affect their tornado responses: An integration of STOPS and SMCC. Public Relations Review, 45(4), 101831. Online: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2019.101831 Maksl, A., Ashley, S. & Craft, S. (2015). Measuring News Media Literacy. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 6(3), 29–45. McDougall, J. (2019). Media Literacy versus Fake News: Critical Thinking, Resilience and Civic Engagement. Media Studies, 10(19). Online: https://doi.org/10.20901/ms.10.19.2 Neuwirth, K. & Frederick, E. (2002). Extending the Framework of Third-, First-, and Second-Person Effects. Mass Communication and Society, 5(2), 113–140. Online: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0502_2 Norris, S. P. & Phillips, L. M. (1987). Explanations of Reading Comprehension: Schema Theory and Critical Thinking Theory. Teachers College Record, 89(2), 281–306. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/016146818708900205 Oberhelman, D. D. (2007). Coming to terms with Web 2.0. Reference Reviews, 21(7), 5–6. Online: https://doi.org/10.1108/09504120710836473 Ouyang, Z., Gong, X. & Yan, J. (2020). Spill-over effects of a hotel scam: How public perception influence communicative actions in social media in China. Current Issues in Tourism, 23(23), 2986–3000. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2020.1800603 Parto, M. (2011). Problem solving, self-efficacy, and mental health in adolescents: Assessing the mediating role of assertiveness. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 30, 644–648. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.10.125 Prior, D. D., Mazanov, J., Meacheam, D., Heaslip, G. & Hanson, J. (2016). Attitude, digital literacy and self efficacy: Flow-on effects for online learning behavior. The Internet and Higher Education, 29, 91–97. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.01.001 Raj, P. S. (2019, January 29). Media literacy is critical. The Star. Online: https://www.thestar.com.my/opinion/letters/2019/01/29/media-literacy-helps-people-consume-media-with-a-critical-eye/ Ramayah, T., Cheah, J., Chuah, F., Ting, H. & Memon, M. A. (2018). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) using SmartPLS 3.0: An updated and practical guide to statistical analysis. Pearson. Rampersad, G. & Althiyabi, T. (2020). Fake news: Acceptance by demographics and culture on social media. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 17(1), 1–11. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2019.1686676 Rohman, M. A. P., Reduan, H., Karim, L. A. A., Radhi, N. A. M. & Adnan, A. S. (2018, March 26). WhatsApp, Facebook main sources of fake news for Malaysians. News Straits Times. Online: https://www.nst.com.my/news/nation/2018/03/349523/whatsapp-facebook-main-sources-fake-news-malaysians Selwyn, N. (2007). Web 2.0 applications as alternative environments for informal learning: A critical review. OECD. Seo, H., Blomberg, M., Altschwager, D. & Vu, H. T. (2021). Vulnerable populations and misinformation: A mixed-methods approach to underserved older adults’ online information assessment. New Media & Society, 23(7), 2012–2033. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820925041 Shahar, F. M. (2017, March 14). Communications Ministry launches sebenarnya.my to quash fake news, information. News Straits Times. Online: https://www.nst.com.my/news/2017/03/220604/communications-ministry-launches-sebenarnyamy-quash-fake-news-information Shin, K.-A. & Han, M. (2016). The role of negative emotions on motivation and communicative action: Testing the validity of situational theory of problem solving in the context of South Korea. Asian Journal of Communication, 26(1), 76–93. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2015.1083597 Simmons, T. (2018). Media literacy and fake news: How media literacy can curb the fake news trend. In J. Cubbage (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Media Literacy in Higher Education Environments (pp. 255–268). Igi Global. StudyMalaysia.com (2020, June 24). List of universities in Malaysia. Online: https://www.studymalaysia.com/education/top-stories/list-of-universities-in-malaysia Tandoc, E. C., Lim, Z. W. & Ling, R. (2018). Defining “Fake News”: A typology of scholarly definitions. Digital Journalism, 6(2), 137–153. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1360143 Varis, T. (2010). Communication and New Literacies in the Multicultural World. Historia y Comunicación Social, 15, 13–26. Veeriah, J. (2021). Young adults’ ability to detect fake news and their new media literacy level in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Content, Community, and Communication, 13, 372–383. Online: https://doi.org/10.31620/JCCC.06.21/31 Vosoughi, S., Roy, D. & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380), 1146–1151. Online: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap9559 Vraga, E. K., Tully, M., Akin, H. & Rojas, H. (2012). Modifying perceptions of hostility and credibility of news coverage of an environmental controversy through media literacy. Journalism, 13(7), 942–959. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884912455906 Vraga, E. K., Tully, M. & Rojas, H. (2009). Media Literacy Training Reduces Perception of Bias. Newspaper Research Journal, 30(4), 68–81. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/073953290903000406 Wagner, M. C. & Boczkowski, P. J. (2019). The Reception of Fake News: The Interpretations and Practices that Shape the Consumption of Perceived Misinformation. Digital Journalism, 7(7), 870–885. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2019.1653208 Wang, Y.-M. (2007). Riding to the Future: An Investigation of Information Literacy Skills of Students at an Urban University as Applied to the Web Environment. International Journal on E-Learning, 6(4), 593–603. Wardle, C. & Derakhshan, H. (2018). Thinking about ‘information disorder’: Formats of misinformation, disinformation, and mal-information. In C. Ireton & J. Posetti (Eds.), Journalism, ‘Fake News’ & Disinformation (pp. 43–54). UNESCO. Wineburg, S., McGrew, S., Breakstone, J. & Ortega, T. (2016). Evaluating information: The cornerstone of civic online reasoning. Stanford Digital Repository. Online: http://purl.stanford.edu/fv751yt5934 Yildiz Durak, H. & Saritepeci, M. (2019). Modeling the effect of new media literacy levels and social media usage status on problematic internet usage behaviours among high school students. Education and Information Technologies, 24(4), 2205–2223. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09864-9 Zainal, H. (2017, December 15). Significant spike in complaints about fake news. The Star. Online: https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2017/12/15/significant-spike-in-complaints-about-fake-news/ Zhang, X. & Ghorbani, A. A. (2020). An overview of online fake news: Characterization, detection, and discussion. Information Processing & Management, 57(2), 102025. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2019.03.004 " ["copyrightYear"]=> int(2024) ["issueId"]=> int(593) ["licenseUrl"]=> string(43) "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0" ["pages"]=> string(9) "111–132" ["pub-id::doi"]=> string(19) "10.17646/KOME.of.16" ["abstract"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(1052) "

Fake news identification has been widely studied in the past, but research on motivating individuals, particularly university students, to fact-check news and disseminate corrective information to counter fake news is lacking. Grounded on the situational theory of problem solving (STOPS), this study aims to examine the situational perceptions and referent criterion that motivate university students to counter fake news through communicative action and examine the influence of new media literacy on the situational perceptions and referent criterion. Based on 528 responses from an online survey, new media literacy is related to all STOPS factors in countering fake news. Situational perceptions are significantly related to situational motivation in countering fake news, while situational motivation and referent criterion significantly influence communicative action. The findings extend the existing literature on countering fake news and are expected to contribute to strategic planning in future anti-fake news intervention campaigns.

" } ["copyrightHolder"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(31) "Ying Shin Chin, Hasmah Zanuddin" } ["prefix"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" } ["subtitle"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(77) "Examining Situational Perceptions, Referent Criterion, and New Media Literacy" } ["title"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(56) "What Motivates University Students to Counter Fake News?" } ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["authors"]=> array(2) { [0]=> object(Author)#913 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(15) { ["id"]=> int(9774) ["email"]=> string(21) "vincentcyss@gmail.com" ["includeInBrowse"]=> bool(true) ["publicationId"]=> int(7756) ["seq"]=> int(5) ["userGroupId"]=> int(339) ["country"]=> string(2) "MY" ["orcid"]=> string(0) "" ["url"]=> string(0) "" ["affiliation"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(164) "Department of Media and Communication Studies, and Department of Public Relations, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia" } ["biography"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" } ["familyName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(4) "Chin" } ["givenName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(9) "Ying Shin" } ["preferredPublicName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(14) "Ying Shin Chin" } ["submissionLocale"]=> string(5) "en_US" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } [1]=> object(Author)#903 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(15) { ["id"]=> int(9775) ["email"]=> string(17) "hasmahz@um.edu.my" ["includeInBrowse"]=> bool(true) ["publicationId"]=> int(7756) ["seq"]=> int(5) ["userGroupId"]=> int(339) ["country"]=> string(2) "MY" ["orcid"]=> string(0) "" ["url"]=> string(0) "" ["affiliation"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(128) "Department of Media and Communication Studies, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia" } ["biography"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" } ["familyName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(6) "Hasmah" } ["givenName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(8) "Zanuddin" } ["preferredPublicName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(15) "Hasmah Zanuddin" } ["submissionLocale"]=> string(5) "en_US" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } ["keywords"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> array(5) { [0]=> string(9) "fake news" [1]=> string(18) "new media literacy" [2]=> string(23) "situational perceptions" [3]=> string(18) "referent criterion" [4]=> string(45) "situational theory of problem solving (STOPS)" } } ["subjects"]=> array(0) { } ["disciplines"]=> array(0) { } ["languages"]=> array(0) { } ["supportingAgencies"]=> array(0) { } ["galleys"]=> array(1) { [0]=> object(ArticleGalley)#912 (7) { ["_submissionFile"]=> NULL ["_data"]=> array(9) { ["submissionFileId"]=> int(36175) ["id"]=> int(5990) ["isApproved"]=> bool(false) ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["label"]=> string(3) "PDF" ["publicationId"]=> int(7756) ["seq"]=> int(0) ["urlPath"]=> string(0) "" ["urlRemote"]=> string(0) "" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(true) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) }

object(Publication)#900 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(29) { ["id"]=> int(7347) ["accessStatus"]=> int(0) ["datePublished"]=> string(10) "2024-10-14" ["lastModified"]=> string(19) "2024-11-12 22:36:14" ["primaryContactId"]=> int(9178) ["sectionId"]=> int(133) ["seq"]=> int(6) ["submissionId"]=> int(7223) ["status"]=> int(3) ["version"]=> int(1) ["categoryIds"]=> array(0) { } ["citationsRaw"]=> string(8236) "Alam, M. K. (2021). A Systematic Qualitative Case Study: Questions, Data Collection, NVivo Analysis and Saturation. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 16(1), 1–31. Almenara, J. C. & Cejudo, M. D. C. L. (2013). La aplicación del juicio de experto como técnica de evaluación de las tecnologías de la información y comunicación (TIC). Revista Eduweb, 7(2), 11–22. Auverset, L. A. & Billings, A. C. (2016). Relationships between Social TV and Enjoyment: A Content Analysis of The Walking Dead’s Story Sync Experience. Social Media + Society, 2(3). Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116662170 Baiz, A. (Director) (2022, August 5). The Dolls House (Season 1, Episode 7) [TV series episode]. In N. Gaiman & D. S. Goyer (Executive Producers), The Sandman. Netflix. Online: www.netflix.com Borstein, A. (Writer) & Hemingway, A. (Director) (2013, February 24). Cascading Failures (Season 3, Episode 6) [TV series episode]. In J. Wells, P. Abbott & A. Stearn (Executive Producers), Shameless. Netflix. Online: www.netflix.com Carmona, C. (2011). Child Welfare Workers’ Perceptions of the Impact of Media Portrayals of Child Maltreatment Cases. [Master’s thesis, California State University, Los Angeles]. Online: https://csu-la.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/01CALS_ULA/tnjv5q/cdi_proquest_journals_888029371 Child Welfare Information Gateway (s. a.). Using Social Media to Engage Families. Online: https://www.childwelfare.gov/ Destrieo (2021, September 12). Things I don’t care about as a CPS SW [Video]. TikTok. Online: https://www.tiktok.com/@destrieo/video/7007093616673934597 Freeman, M. L. & Valentine, D. P. (2004). Through the Eyes of Hollywood: Images of Social Workers in Film. Social Work, 49(2), 151–161. Fury, D. (Writer) & Fury, D. (Director) (2002, January 8). Gone (Season 6, Episode 11) [TV series episode]. In J. Whedon (Executive Producer), Buffy the Vampire Slayer. Mutant Enemy Productions. Hicks, V. E. (2016). Minorities’ Perceptions of Child Protective Services [Master’s thesis, California State University San Bernadino]. Online: https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/etd/347 Klein, B. (2011). Entertaining Ideas: Social Issues in Entertainment Television. Media Culture & Society, 33(6), 905–921. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443711411008 Messina, N. M. (2019, August). Identity and Identification through the Changing Views, Expectations, and Representations of Family on Television (Publication No. 22588142) [Master’s thesis, Temple University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. Mitchell, M. (Director) (2015, October 7). Institutional Fail (Season 17, Episode 4) [TV series episode]. In D. Wolf, J. Starch & A. Forney (Executive Producers), SVU. NBC. Online: www.nbc.com National Association of Social Workers (2023, February 16). National Survey from Ipsos Finds 80 Percent of Americans have a Favorable Opinion of Social Workers. Online: https://www.socialworkers.org/News/News-Releases/ID/2618/National-Survey-from-Ipsos-finds-80-percent-of-Americans-have-afavorable-opinion-of-Social-Workers Norman, D. (2022, August 25). Shameless: 15 Best Episodes, Ranked. ScreenRant. Online: https://screenrant.com/shameless-best-episodes-reddit/ Olin, J. (2013). The Public and the Profession’s Perception of Social Work. Columbia Social Work Review, 11(1), 92–102. Online: https://doi.org/10.7916/cswr.v11i1.1931 Pal, A. & Counts, S. (2011). What’s in a@ Name? How Name Value Biases Judgment of Microblog Authors. In Proceedings of the Fifth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 5(1), 257–264. Pasztor, S. K. & Korn, J. U. (2015). Zombie Fans, Second Screen, and Television Audiences: Redefining Parasociality as Technoprosociality in AMC’s #TalkingDead. In A. F. Slade, A. J. Narro & D. Givens-Carroll (Eds.), Television, social media, and fan culture (pp. 185–200). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books. Piotrowska, A. G. (2018). Analyzing Music in TV Shows: Some Methodological Considerations. Наука телевидения, (14.3), 10–27. Reid, W. J. & Misener, E. (2001). Social Work in the Press: A Cross‐National Study. International Journal of Social Welfare, 10(3), 194–201. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2397.00172 Rixon, P. (2013). Re-evaluating the Role of Television Criticism in the British Press. Journalism (London, England), 14(3), 388–400. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884912443197 Scanlan, N. & Hanshaw, S. (2022). “Blameless”: Using Popular Entertainment Media to Build Social Context in Nursing Students. Journal of the New York State Nurses Association, 49(2), 5–11. Schreiber, J. C., Fuller, T. & Paceley, M. S. (2013). Engagement in Child Protective Services: Parent Perceptions of Worker Skills. Children and Youth Services Review, 35(4), 707–715. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2013.01.018 Shameless (s. a.). Rotten Tomatoes. Online: https://www.rottentomatoes.com/tv/shameless Social Workers are Overlooked as TV Heroes (2019, August 13). Daily Press. Online: https://www.dailypress.com/news/dp-xpm-20030820-2003-08-20-0308200103-story.html Solomon, J. (2019, August 26). Former Pinellas Child Protective Investigator Pleads Guilty to Falsifying Reports. Tampa Bay Times. Online: https://www.tampabay.com/news/pinellas/crime/former-pinellaschild-protective-investigator-pleads-guilty-to-falsifying-reports-20190517/ Tirado, D. (2006). Perception of Social Workers: An Analysis of Public Knowledge, Attitudes, and Beliefs in New York City [Doctoral dissertation, Yeshiva University]. Online: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12202/851 Teurlings, J. (2018). Social Media and the New Commons of TV Criticism. Television & New Media, 19(3), 208–224. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476417709599 U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2024, January 26). Employed Persons by Detailed Occupation, Sex, Race, and Hispanic or Latino Ethnicity. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Online: https://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat11.htm Using Social Media to Engage Families (2018). U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Office of Head Start, National Center on Parent, Family, and Community Engagement. Online: https://eclkc.ohs.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/using-social-media-engagefamilies-OHS-508-final.pdf Varn, K. (2019, August 15). Pinellas Child Protective Investigator Posted Case Details on Reddit. Tampa Bay Times. Online: https://www.tampabay.com/pinellas/pinellas-child-protective-investigator-posted-casedetails-on-reddit-20190118/ Verschoor, S. (2019, August 26). Pasco County Child Protective Investigator Arrested for Falsifying Records in Abuse Case. Tampa Bay Times. Online: https://www.tampabay.com/pasco/pasco-county-childprotective-investigator-arrested-for-falsifying-records-in-abuse-case-20190621/ Vis, S. A., Berger, T. & Lauritzen, C. (2022). Norwegian School Children’s Perceptions of the Child Protection Services. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 39(3), 337–346. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-022-00822-y Viswanathan, V., Malthouse, E. C., Maslowska, E., Hoornaert, S. & Van den Poel, D. (2018). Dynamics between Social Media Engagement, Firm-Generated Content, and Live and Time-Shifted TV Viewing. Journal of Service Management, 29(3), 378–398. Online: https://doi.org/10.1108/josm-09-2016-0241 Wang, F. T. Y. (2008, October 1). When a Social Worker Encounters Cultural Studies. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 9(3), 496–499. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/14649370802184833 Wohn, D. Y. & Na, E. K. (2011). Tweeting about TV: Sharing Television Viewing Experiences via Social Media Message Streams. First Monday, 16(3–7). Online: https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/download/3368/2779 Wright, G. (2010, April 15). Where are Social Workers on Medical TV Shows? Social Workers Speak! Online: http://www.socialworkersspeak.org/hollywood-connection/where-are-social-workers-on-hospital-tvshows.html Zugazaga, C. B., Surette, R. B., Mendez, M. & Otto, C. W. (2006). Social Worker Perceptions of the Portrayal of the Profession in the News and Entertainment Media: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Social Work Education, 42(3), 621–636." ["copyrightYear"]=> int(2024) ["issueId"]=> int(593) ["licenseUrl"]=> string(43) "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0" ["pages"]=> string(9) "133–158" ["pub-id::doi"]=> string(19) "10.17646/KOME.of.17" ["abstract"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(1078) "

Child Protective Services (CPS) workers appear in television plotlines across every fiction genre, and these depictions are often quite unfavourable. Customer engagement behaviours (CEBs), or what viewers say in online forums or on social media influence how other viewers perceive CPS workers. This interconnectivity is examined here through the framework of CEBs and Social TV using case studies from four popular programs: Buffy the Vampire Slayer (BtVS), Shameless, Law and Order: SVU (SVU), and The Sandman. These case studies were compared for accuracy against observations given by a former Child Protective Investigator, whose feedback indicated that the realistic programs (SVU and Shameless), while being overly dramatised, had more authentic and balanced CPS portrayals than the fantasy programs (BtVS and The Sandman). Common themes from the audience in the CEBs are: CPS workers are overworked, underpaid, and too bureaucratic; greed motivates some families to foster or adopt children; and that the system of protective services is broken.

" } ["copyrightHolder"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(60) "Jonina Anderson-Lopez, Dr. Allison Budaj, Dr. Erin E. Dennis" } ["subtitle"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(74) "Social Media Perceptions of Television Portrayals of Fictional CPS Workers" } ["title"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(61) "“Social Workers Should Be Required to Watch this Episode”" } ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["authors"]=> array(3) { [0]=> object(Author)#921 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(15) { ["id"]=> int(9178) ["email"]=> string(22) "ginaluisa329@gmail.com" ["includeInBrowse"]=> bool(true) ["publicationId"]=> int(7347) ["seq"]=> int(6) ["userGroupId"]=> int(339) ["country"]=> string(2) "US" ["orcid"]=> string(0) "" ["url"]=> string(0) "" ["affiliation"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(53) "a:1:{s:5:"en_US";s:27:"University of South Florida";}" ["hu_HU"]=> string(53) "a:1:{s:5:"en_US";s:27:"University of South Florida";}" } ["biography"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" } ["familyName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(14) "Anderson-Lopez" ["hu_HU"]=> string(19) "Gina Anderson-Lopez" } ["givenName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(7) "Jonina " ["hu_HU"]=> string(25) "Dr. Jonina Anderson-Lopez" } ["preferredPublicName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(21) "Jonina Anderson-Lopez" } ["submissionLocale"]=> string(5) "en_US" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } [1]=> object(Author)#920 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(15) { ["id"]=> int(9179) ["email"]=> string(23) "allison.budaj@joyce.edu" ["includeInBrowse"]=> bool(false) ["publicationId"]=> int(7347) ["seq"]=> int(6) ["userGroupId"]=> int(339) ["country"]=> string(2) "US" ["orcid"]=> string(0) "" ["url"]=> string(0) "" ["affiliation"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(16) "Joyce University" } ["biography"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" } ["familyName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" } ["givenName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(13) "Allison Budaj" } ["preferredPublicName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(13) "Allison Budaj" } ["submissionLocale"]=> string(5) "en_US" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } [2]=> object(Author)#911 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(15) { ["id"]=> int(9180) ["email"]=> string(16) "eegilles@usi.edu" ["includeInBrowse"]=> bool(false) ["publicationId"]=> int(7347) ["seq"]=> int(6) ["userGroupId"]=> int(339) ["country"]=> string(2) "US" ["orcid"]=> string(0) "" ["url"]=> string(0) "" ["affiliation"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(30) "University of Southern Indiana" } ["biography"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" } ["familyName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" } ["givenName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(14) "Erin E. Gilles" } ["preferredPublicName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(14) "Erin E. Gilles" } ["submissionLocale"]=> string(5) "en_US" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } ["keywords"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> array(6) { [0]=> string(10) "CPS worker" [1]=> string(12) "social media" [2]=> string(10) "television" [3]=> string(9) "social TV" [4]=> string(7) "CEB’s" [5]=> string(13) "TV portrayals" } } ["subjects"]=> array(0) { } ["disciplines"]=> array(0) { } ["languages"]=> array(0) { } ["supportingAgencies"]=> array(0) { } ["galleys"]=> array(1) { [0]=> object(ArticleGalley)#916 (7) { ["_submissionFile"]=> NULL ["_data"]=> array(9) { ["submissionFileId"]=> int(36176) ["id"]=> int(6081) ["isApproved"]=> bool(false) ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["label"]=> string(3) "PDF" ["publicationId"]=> int(7347) ["seq"]=> int(0) ["urlPath"]=> string(0) "" ["urlRemote"]=> string(0) "" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(true) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) }

object(Publication)#75 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(30) { ["id"]=> int(7745) ["accessStatus"]=> int(0) ["datePublished"]=> string(10) "2024-10-14" ["lastModified"]=> string(19) "2024-10-14 14:45:23" ["primaryContactId"]=> int(9760) ["sectionId"]=> int(144) ["seq"]=> int(1) ["submissionId"]=> int(7621) ["status"]=> int(3) ["version"]=> int(1) ["categoryIds"]=> array(0) { } ["citationsRaw"]=> string(9418) "Adler, P. A. & Adler, P. (1987). Membership Roles in Field Research. Sage. Altemeyer, B. (2008). The Authoritarians (Unabridged ed.). Cherry Hill Publishing. Bajusz, O. (2019). A cukiság mint depolitizáló tényező: két magyar esettanulmány [Sweetness as a depoliticising factor: Two Hungarian case studies]. Replika, 112, 189–215. Online: https://doi.org/10.32564/112.15 Bajusz, O. (2022). Cancel culture: cenzúra, vagy valami más? [Cancel culture: Censorship or something else]. Kultúra és Közösség, 13(4), 61–73. Online: https://doi.org/10.35402/kek.2022.4.8 Bajusz, O. & Feró, D. (2021). Túlélni a magyar „feminizmust” és „baloldalt” [Surviving Hungarian “feminism” and the “left”]. Szellem és Tudomány, (3), 23–58. Beiner, A. (2020). Sleeping Woke: Cancel Culture and Simulated Religion. Online: https://medium.com/rebel-wisdom/sleeping-woke-cancel-culture-and-simulated-religion-5f96af2cc107 Bishop, C. (2006). The Social Turn: Collaboration and Its Discontents. Artforum. Online: https://www.artforum.com/print/200602/the-social-turn-collaboration-and-its-discontents-10274 Bishop, C. (2012). Artificial Hells. Participatory Art and the Politics of Spectatorship. Verso. Buckels, E. E., Trapnell, P. D. & Paulhus, D. L. (2014). Trolls just want to have fun. Personality and Individual Differences, 67, 97–102. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.01.016 Clark, M. (2020). Drag Them: A brief etymology of so-called “cancel culture”. Communication and the Public, 5(3–4), 88–92. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/2057047320961562 Costello, T. H., Bowes, S. M., Stevens, S. T., Waldman, I. D., Tasimi, A. & Lilienfeld, S. O. (2022). Clarifying the structure and nature of left-wing authoritarianism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 122(1), 135–170. Online: https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000341 Eisenstein, C. (2021). Mob Morality and the Unvaxxed. Online: https://charleseisenstein.org/essays/mob-morality-and-the-unvaxxed/ Ellis, C. & Bochner, A. P. (2000). Autoethnography, personal narrative, reflexivity. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 733–768). Sage. Ellis, C., Bochner, A. P. & Adams, T. (2011). Autoethnography: An Overview. Historical Social Research / Historische Sozialforschung, 36(4), 273–290. Eșanu, O. (2008). The Transition of the Soros Centers to Contemporary Art: The Managed Avant-Garde. CCCK Center for Communication and Context. Ettorre, E. (2016). Autoethnography as Feminist Method: Sensitising the feminist ‘I’. Routledge. Foster, H. (2015). Bad New Days. Art, Criticism, Emergency. Verso. Furedi, F. (2004). Where Have All the Intellectuals Gone. Continuum. Freedom of Expression Survey (2020). Online: https://www.artsprofessional.co.uk/pulse/survey/freedom-expression Gardner, A. (2015). Postsocialist Art against Democracy. MIT Press. Harper, J. (2013). Mobbed! What to Do When They Really Are Out to Get You. Backdoor Press. Henderson, R. (2019, December 1). 5 Reasons Why People Love Cancel Culture. Psychology Today. Online: https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/after-service/201912/5-reasons-why-people-love-cancel-culture Jussim, L. (2020, December 22). Ten Ways to Defend Against a Cancellation Attack. Psychology Today. Online: https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/rabble-rouser/202012/ten-ways-to-defend-against-a-cancellation-attack Kester, G. H. (2011). The One and the Many. Contemporary Collaborative Art in a Global Context. Duke University Press. Krispenz, A. & Bertrams, A. (2024). Understanding Left-Wing Authoritarianism: Relations to Dark Personality Traits, Altruism, and Social Justice Commitment. Current Psychology, 43, 2714–2730. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04463-x Kriss, S. (2020). Appeasing the Gods of Posting. Online: https://www.thebellows.org/appeasing-the-gods-of-posting/ Laidlaw, E. (2017). Online Shaming and the Right to Privacy. Laws, 6(1). Online: https://doi.org/10.3390/laws6010003 Latour, B. (2003). The promises of constructivism. In D. Ihde & E. Selinger (Eds.), Chasing Technoscience. Matrix for Materiality (pp. 27–46). Indiana University Press. Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social. An Introduction to Actor‐Network‐Theory. Oxford University Press. Limberg, P. & Arsov, L. (2020, July 31). The Cancel God. High Existence. Online: https://highexistence.com/cancel-god/ Lofton, K. (2023, March 27). Cancel Culture and Other Myths: Anti-fandom as heartbreak. The Yale Review. Online: https://yalereview.org/article/kathryn-lofton-cancel-culture Lovink, G. (2020). Delete Your Profile, Not People. Online: https://www.eurozine.com/delete-your-profile-not-people/ Luu, C. (2019, December 18). Cancel Culture Is Chaotic Good. JSTOR Daily. Online: https://daily.jstor.org/cancel-culture-is-chaotic-good/ March, E. & Steele, G. (2020). High Esteem and Hurting Others Online: Trait Sadism Moderates the Relationship Between Self-Esteem and Internet Trolling. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 23(7), 441–446. Online: https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2019.0652 Miessen, M. (2017). Crossbenching: Towards a Proactive Mode of Participation as a Critical Spatial Practice. Doctoral thesis, Goldsmiths, University of London. Miller, M. (2020). The Occult Left. Online: https://cryptogram.substack.com/p/the-locusts-have-no-king Mouffe, C. (2008). Art and Democracy: Art as an Agnostic Intervention in Public Space. Open! A Platform for Art, Culture and the Public Domain, (14), 6–15. Mouffe, C. (2010). Chantal Mouffe. Online: https://www.artforum.com/print/201006/chantal-mouffe-25710 Mueller, T. S. (2021). Blame, then shame? Psychological predictors in cancel culture behavior. The Social Science Journal, 1–14. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/03623319.2021.1949552 Murphy, J. (2019, September 26). Supernatural Toxicity with Nina Power and DC Miller. YouTube. Online: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b6svwTDh4CE Ng, E. (2020). No Grand Pronouncements Here...: Reflections on Cancel Culture and Digital Media Participation. Television & New Media, 21(6), 621–627. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476420918828 Nicotra, J. (2016, July 6). Disgust, Distributed: Virtual Public Shaming as Epideictic Assemblage. Enculturation. Online: http://enculturation.net/disgust-distributed Norris, P. (2020). Closed Minds? Is a ‘Cancel Culture’ Stifling Academic Freedom and Intellectual Debate in Political Science? Harvard Kennedy School Faculty Research Working Paper, RWP20-025. Online: https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3671026 Norris, P. (2021). Cancel culture: Myth or reality? Political Studies, 71(1), 45–74. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/00323217211037023 Okoliko, N. (2021, November 9). Web 2.0, Cancel Culture, and Lessons for the Governance We Desire. Vanguard. Online: https://www.vanguardngr.com/2021/11/web-2-0-cancel-culture-and-lessons-for-the-governance-we-desire/ Perry, G. (2013). Behind the Shock Machine. The Untold Story of the Notorious Milgram Psychology Experiments. New Press. Phelan, S. (2023). Seven theses about the so-called culture war(s) (or some fragmentary notes on ‘cancel culture’). Cultural Studies, 1–26. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2023.2199309 Posner, E. (2015, April 9). A terrible shame: Enforcing moral norms without the law is no way to create a virtuous society. Slate. Online: https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2015/04/internet-shaming-the-legal-history-of-shame-and-its-costs-and-benefits.html Power, N. (2019). Cancelled. Online: https://ninapower.net/2019/04/06/cancelled/ Puncer, M. (2019). Participatory Art, Philosophy and Criticism. Filozofski Vestnik, 40(3), 241–260. Rodigari, S. (2017). Empty Gesture: Artists’ Labour in Socially Engaged Art. Doctor of Philosophy thesis, School of the Arts, English and Media, University of Wollongong. Online: https://ro.uow.edu.au/theses1/238 Saint-Louis, H. (2021). Understanding cancel culture: Normative and unequal sanctioning. First Monday, 26(7). Online: http://dx.doi.org/10.5210/fm.v26i7.10891 Simkhovich, V. & Naumov, D. I. (2022). Cancelling as a social phenomenon: Theoretical aspect. Journal of the Belarusian State University, (4), 71–79. Online: https://doi.org/10.33581/2521-6821-2022-4-71-79 Thomas, L. & Egan, V. (2022). A systematic review and meta-analysis examining the relationship between everyday sadism and aggression: Can subclinical sadistic traits predict aggressive behaviour within the general population? Aggression and Violent Behavior, 65. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2022.101750 Tiplady, J. (2019). Semi-Automatic Angel: Notes on “Cancel Culture” and Post-Cancellation Rococo. Online: https://xn--wgiaa.ws/3-jonty-tiplady-notes-on-cancel-culture Velasco, J. (2020). You Are Cancelled: Virtual Collective Consciousness and the Emergence of Cancel Culture as Ideological Purging. Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 12(5). Online: https://doi.org/10.21659/rupkatha.v12n5.rioc1s21n2 Weiss, B. (2020). Resignation letter. Online: https://www.bariweiss.com/resignation-letter Whipple, K. (2023). Contextualizing the Art and the Artist: How U.S. Arts and Culture Journalists Perceive the Impact of Cancel Culture Practices and Discourses. Journalism Practice, 1–19. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2023.2180653" ["copyrightYear"]=> int(2024) ["issueId"]=> int(593) ["licenseUrl"]=> string(43) "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0" ["pages"]=> string(7) "29–42" ["pub-id::doi"]=> string(19) "10.17646/KOME.of.15" ["abstract"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(970) "

My argument is that the participatory ethos has contributed to cancel culture. I analyse various framings of cancel culture, as it is a complex phenomenon, one aspect of which concerns myth and ritual. I connect this to criticism of the participatory turn in contemporary art, which claims that participation is a public ritual that has been politically co-opted for different ends, such as producing fake consensus or the illusion of democratic engagement. To test my argument, I analyse my own cancellation, whilst being involved in Hungarian feminism, which in my experience has been a backwater in political parties and lobbies. I claim that the participatory turn has indeed been co-opted, either to represent participation, or as formats for politically instrumentalised subjectivation rituals. Cancellations take place when rituals of subjectivation and representation become sacrificial rituals, since sacrificing someone imbues participation with affect.

" } ["copyrightHolder"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(14) "Bajusz Orsolya" } ["prefix"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" } ["subtitle"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" } ["title"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(59) "Cancel Culture or the Realpolitik of the Participatory Turn" } ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["authors"]=> array(1) { [0]=> object(Author)#844 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(15) { ["id"]=> int(9760) ["email"]=> string(18) "o.bajusz@gmail.com" ["includeInBrowse"]=> bool(true) ["publicationId"]=> int(7745) ["seq"]=> int(1) ["userGroupId"]=> int(339) ["country"]=> string(2) "HU" ["orcid"]=> string(0) "" ["url"]=> string(0) "" ["affiliation"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" } ["biography"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" } ["familyName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(6) "Bajusz" } ["givenName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(7) "Orsolya" } ["preferredPublicName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(14) "Bajusz Orsolya" } ["submissionLocale"]=> string(5) "en_US" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } ["keywords"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> array(5) { [0]=> string(18) "participatory arts" [1]=> string(14) "cancel culture" [2]=> string(12) "culture wars" [3]=> string(14) "tactical media" [4]=> string(16) "art and politics" } } ["subjects"]=> array(0) { } ["disciplines"]=> array(0) { } ["languages"]=> array(0) { } ["supportingAgencies"]=> array(0) { } ["galleys"]=> array(1) { [0]=> object(ArticleGalley)#894 (7) { ["_submissionFile"]=> NULL ["_data"]=> array(9) { ["submissionFileId"]=> int(36171) ["id"]=> int(5972) ["isApproved"]=> bool(false) ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["label"]=> string(3) "PDF" ["publicationId"]=> int(7745) ["seq"]=> int(0) ["urlPath"]=> string(0) "" ["urlRemote"]=> string(0) "" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(true) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) }