KOME
About journal
KOME is a theory and pure research-oriented journal of communication studies and related fields. Therefore theoretical researches and discussions that help to understand better, or reconceptualize the understanding of communication or the media are its center of interests; being either an useful supplement to, or a reasonable alternative to current models and theories. Given the connection between theory and empirical research, we are open to submissions of empirical papers if the research demonstrates a clear endorsement of communication and media theories. We are also committed to the ideas of trans- and interdisciplinarity and prefer topics that are relevant for more than one special discipline of social sciences. Articles published in KOME should represent the diversity that comprises the study of communication and related disciplines, regardless of philosophical paradigms and in favor of methodological pluralism. KOME encourage the use of non-sexist language in research writing.
Online First
The Tricky Bits of Studying Agreement and Disagreement in Online Deliberation Current Research Directions and Methods in the Field of Political Communication
object(Publication)#1120 (6) {
["_data"]=>
array(28) {
["id"]=>
int(7445)
["accessStatus"]=>
int(0)
["lastModified"]=>
string(19) "2025-06-17 14:39:46"
["primaryContactId"]=>
int(9335)
["sectionId"]=>
int(133)
["seq"]=>
int(0)
["submissionId"]=>
int(7321)
["status"]=>
int(5)
["version"]=>
int(1)
["categoryIds"]=>
array(0) {
}
["citationsRaw"]=>
string(31928) "Alarabiat, A., Soares, D. S. & Estevez, E. (2016). Electronic Participation with a Special Reference to Social Media – A Literature Review. Electronic Participation: 8th IFIP WG 8.5 International Conference, EPart 2016, Guimarães, Portugal, September 5–8. Proceedings, 41–52.
Alnemr, N. (2020). Emancipation Cannot Be Programmed: Blind Spots of Algorithmic Facilitation in Online Deliberation. Contemporary Politics, 26(5), 531–552. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2020.1791306
Altheide, D. L. (2020). Media Logic and Media Psychology. In J. van den Bulck (Ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Media Psychology (pp. 1–15). Wiley.
Bächtiger, A. & Gerber, M. (2014). Gentlemanly Conversation or Vigorous Contestation? An Exploratory Analysis of Communication Modes in a Transnational Deliberative Poll (Europolis). In K. Grönlund, A.
Bächtiger & M. Setälä (Eds.), Deliberative Mini-Publics: Involving Citizens in the Democratic Process (pp. 115–134). ECPR Press.
Baek, Y. M., Wojcieszak, M. & Delli Carpini, M. X. (2012). Online Versus Face-to-Face Deliberation: Who? Why? What? With What Effects? New Media & Society, 14(3), 363–383. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444811413191
Baekgaard, M., Christensen, J., Madsen, J. K. & Mikkelsen, K.S. (2020). Rallying Around the Flag in Times of COVID-19: Societal Lockdown and Trust in Democratic Institutions. Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, 3(2). Online: https://doi.org/10.30636/jbpa.32.172
Bakshy, E., Messing, S. & Adamic, L. A. (2015). Exposure to Ideologically Diverse News and Opinion on Facebook. Science, 348(6239), 1130–1132. Online: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa1160
Barbera, P. (2014). How Social Media Reduces Mass Political Polarization: Evidence from Germany, Spain, and the United States. Working Paper.
Bargain, O. & Aminjonov, U. (2020). Trust and Compliance to Public Health Policies in Times of COVID-19. IZA Discussion Papers No. 13205.
Bertot, J., Jaeger, P. & Grimes, J. (2010). Using ICTs to Create a Culture of Transparency: e-Government and Social Media as Openness and Anti-Corruption Tools for Societies. Government Information Quarterly, 27(3), 264–271. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.03.001
Bode, L. (2016). Pruning the News Feed: Unfriending and Unfollowing Political Content on Social Media. Research & Politics, 3(3). Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168016661873
Bodrunova, S. S. (2018). Cross-Cultural Sentiment Analysis of User Texts on Twitter. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta, 10(6), 191–212. Online: https://doi.org/10.30547/vestnik.journ.6.2018.191212
Bodrunova, S. S. (2021). Russia: A Glass Wall. In Political Communication and COVID-19 (pp. 188–200). Routledge.
Bodrunova, S. S. (2023). Cumulative Deliberation: New Normativity in Studying Public Spheres Online. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta, 10(1), 87–122. Online: https://doi.org/10.30547/vestnik.journ.1.2023.87122
Bodrunova, S. S., Blekanov, I. S. & Maksimov, A. (2021a). Public Opinion Dynamics in Online Discussions: Cumulative Commenting and Micro-level Spirals of Silence. In G. Meiselwitz (Ed.), Social Computing
and Social Media: Experience Design and Social Network Analysis. HCII 2021 (pp. 205–220). Springer. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77626-8_14
Bodrunova, S. S., Litvinenko, A., Blekanov, N. & Ivan, N. (2021b). Incivility and Political Dissent: Multiple Roles of Aggressive Speech in Comments on Russian YouTube. Proceedings of the Weizenbaum Conference 2021 Democracy in Flux (pp. 44–77). Weizenbaum Institute.
Bohman, J. (2006). Deliberative Democracy and the Epistemic Benefits of Diversity. Episteme, 3(3), 175–191. Online: https://doi.org/10.3366/epi.2006.3.3.175
Bohman, J. & Rehg, W. Eds. (1997). Deliberative Democracy. The MIT Press.
Boin, A., ‘t Hart, P. & Kuipers, S. (2018). The Crisis Approach In H. Rodriguez, E. Quarantelli & R. Dynes (Eds.), Handbook of Disaster Research (pp. 23–38). New York: Springer.
Bol, D., Giani, M., Blais, A. & Loewen, P. J. (2020). The Effect of COVID-19 Lockdowns on Political Support: Some Good News for Democracy? European Journal of Political Research, 60(2), 497–505. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12401
Boyd-MacMillan, E. M., Campbell, C. & Furey, A. (2016). An IC Intervention for Post-Conflict Northern Ireland Secondary Schools. Journal of Strategic Security, 9(4), 111–124. Online: http://dx.doi.org/10.5038/1944-0472.9.4.1558
Bridgman, A., Merkley, E., Zhilin, O., Loewen, P. J., Owen, T. & Ruths, D. (2021). Infodemic Pathways: Evaluating the Role That Traditional and Social Media Play in Cross-National Information Transfer. Frontiers in Political Science, 3. Online: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2021.648646
Brundidge, J. (2010). Encountering “Difference” in the Contemporary Public Sphere: The Contribution of the Internet to the Heterogeneity of Political Discussion Networks. Journal of Communication, 60(4), 680–700. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01509.x
Buchanan C. M., Harriger, K. J., McMillan, J. J. & Gusler, S. (2022). Deliberation, Cognitive Complexity, and Political Engagement: A Longitudinal Study of the Impact of Deliberative Training During Emerging Adulthood. Journal of Deliberative Democracy, 18(1). Online: https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.959
Campbell, D. (2013). Social Networks and Political Participation. Annual Review of Political Science, 16, 33–48. Online: https://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-033011-201728
Carcasson, M., Black, L. W. & Sink, E. S. (2010). Communication Studies and Deliberative Democracy: Current Contributions and Future Possibilities. Journal of Public Deliberation, 6(1), 1–42. Online: https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.96
Chambers, S. (1996). Reasonable Democracy. Cornell University Press.
Chugunov, A., Filatova, O. & Misnikov, Y. (2016). Citizens’ Deliberation Online as Will-Formation: The Impact of Media Identity on Policy Discourse Outcomes in Russia. In E. Tambouris, et al. Electronic Participation. ePart 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol. 9821 (pp. 67–82). Springer.
Cohen, J. (1997). Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy. In J. Bohman & W. Rehg. (Eds.), Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics (p. 67). The MIT Press.
Colombo, C. (2018). Hearing the Other Side? Debiasing Political Opinions in the Case of the Scottish Independence Referendum. Political Studies, 66(1), 23–42. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321717723486
Cristea, F. et al. (2022). A Comparative Analysis of Experienced Uncertainties in Relation to Risk Communication During COVID-19: A Four-Country Study. Global Health, 18(1). Online: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-022-00857-x
Davies, B., Lalot, F., Peitz, L., Heering, M., Ozkececi, H., Babaian, J., Hayon, K. D., Broadwood, J. & Abrams, D. (2021). Changes in Political Trust in Britain During the COVID-19 Pandemic in 2020: Integrated Public Opinion Evidence and Implications. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8(1), 1–9. Online: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00850-6
Delli Carpini, M., Cook, F. & Jacobs, L. (2004). Public Deliberation, Discursive Partiсipation, and Citizen Engagement. A Review of Empirical Literature. Annual Review of Political Science, 7, 315–344. Online: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.7.121003.091630
Del Valle, M. E., Sijtsma, R., Stegeman, H. & Borge, R. (2020). Online Deliberation and the Public Sphere: Developing a Coding Manual to Assess Deliberation in Twitter Political Networks. Javnost – The Public, 27(3), 211–229. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2020.1794408
Devine, D., Gaskell, J., Jennings, W. & Stoker, G. (2021). Trust and the Coronavirus Pandemic: What Are
the Consequences of and for Trust? An Early Review of the Literature. Political Studies Review, 19(2), 274–285. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/1478929920948684
Dryzek, J. (2000). Deliberative Democracy and Beyond. Liberals, Critics, Contestations. Oxford University Press.
Dryzek, J. S. (2009). Democratization as Deliberative Capacity Building. Comparative Political Studies, 42(11), 1379–1402.
Dryzek, J. S., Bachtiger, A., Chambers, S., Cohen, J., Druckman, J. N., Felicetti, A., et al. (2019). The Crisis of Democracy and the Science of Deliberation. Science, 363(6432), 1144–1146. Online: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaw2694
Dryzek, J. S. & Niemeyer, S. (2006). Reconciling Pluralism and Consensus as Political Ideals. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 634–649.
Dubois, E. & Szwarc, J. (2018). Self-Censorship, Polarization, and the “Spiral of Silence” on Social Media [Conference session]. Policy & Politics Conference, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Easton, D. (1975). A re-Assessment of the Concept of Political Support. British Journal of Political Science, 5(4), 435–457.
Enikeeva, E. M., Kulnazarova, A. V., Rafikov, A. I. & Shutman, D. V. (2023). The Impact of Digital Tools on Conflictive Communications in the “Government-Society System”: St. Petersburg Experience. Communication Strategies in Digital Society Seminar (ComSDS), Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation, 147–150.
Esau, K., Fleu, D. & Nienhaus, S. (2020). Different Arenas, Different Deliberative Quality? Using a Systemic Framework to Evaluate Online Deliberation on Immigration Policy in Germany. Policy & Internet, 13(1), 86–112. Online: https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.232
Esau, K., Friess, D. & Eilders, C. (2017). Design Matters! An Empirical Analysis of Online Deliberation on Different News Platforms. Policy & Internet, 9(3), 321–342. Online: https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.154
Esterling, K. M., Fung, A. & Lee, T. (2015). How Much Disagreement Is Good for Democratic Deliberation? Political Communication, 32(4), 529–551. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2014.969466
Eveland, W. P. (2004). The Effect of Political Discussion in Producing Informed Citizens: The Roles of Information, Motivation, and Elaboration. Political Communication, 21(2), 177– 193. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600490443877
Eveland, W. P. & Hively, M. H. (2009). Political Discussion Frequency, Network Size, and “Heterogeneity” of Discussion as Predictors of Political Knowledge and Participation. Journal of Communication, 59(2), 205–224. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01412.x
Filatova, O. G. & Chugunov, A. V. (2022). Development of e-Participation Ecosystem in Russia in the Early 2020s: The Role of Social Media and Regional Control Centers. Political Expertise: POLITEX, 18(2), 120–137. Online: http://dx.doi.org/10.21638/spbu23.2022.201
Filatova, O. & Volkovskii, D. (2020). The Online Discourse as a Form of e-Participation: The Experience of Internet Discourse Research. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (ICEGOV 2020). Athens, Greece, 326–333. Online: https://doi.org/10.1145/3428502.3428547
Filatova, O. & Volkovskii, D. (2021). Online Deliberation on Social Media as a Form of Public Dialogue in Russia. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 3090, 146–156. Online: https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3090/paper13.pdf
Fischer, K., Reedy, J., Piercy, C. & Thalpaliya, R. (2022). A Typology of Reasoning in Deliberative Processes: A Study of the 2010 Oregon Citizens’ Initiative Review. Journal of Deliberative Democracy, 18(2). Online: https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.951
Fishkin, J. (1995). The Voice of the People. Yale University Press.
Fournier-Tombs, E. & Di Marzo Serugendo, G. (2020). DelibAnalysis: Understanding the Quality of Online Political Discourse with Machine Learning. Journal of Information Science, 46(6), 810–922. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551519871828
Friess, D. & Eilders, C. (2015). A Systematic Review of Online Deliberation Research. Policy Internet, 7(3), 319–339. Online: https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.95
Gastil, J. (1993). Democracy in Small Groups: Participation, Decision Making, and Communication. New Society.
Gastil, J. (2000). By Popular Demand. University of California Press.
Gastil, J. (2008). Political Communication and Deliberation. Sage.
Gastil, J. (2018). The Lessons and Limitations of Experiments in Democratic Deliberation. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 14(1), 271–291. Online: https://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110316-113639
Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2015). New Technologies and Civic Engagement: New Agendas in Communication. Routledge.
Goodwin, M. (1983). Aggravated Correction and Disagreement in Children’s Conversations. Journal of Pragmatics, 7(6), 657–677. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(83)90089-9
Gonçalves, F. M. & Baranauskas, C. (2023). Designing in Pandemic Context: Scientific Collaboration through the Open Design Platform. Interacting with Computers, 35(2), 105–117. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwac030
Goyanes, M., Borah, P. & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2021). Social Media Filtering and Democracy: Effects of Social Media News Use and Uncivil Political Discussions on Social Media Unfriending. Computers in Human Behavior, 120. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106759
Grönlund, K., Herne, K., Strandberg, K. & Söderlund, P. (2023). Disagreement and Deliberation: Evidence from Three Deliberative Mini-Publics. Political Behavior, 45, 831–853. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-021-09733-7
Grönlund, K., Setälä, M. & Herne K. (2010). Deliberation and Civic Virtues: Lessons from a Citizen Deliberation Experiment. European Political Science Review, 2(1), 95–117. Online: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773909990245
Gutmann, A. & Thompson, D. (1996). Democracy and Disagreement. Harvard University Press.
Habermas, J. (1996). Between Facts and Norms. Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. MIT Press.
Halpern, D. & Gibbs, J. (2013). Social Media as a Catalyst for Online Deliberation? Exploring the Affordances of Facebook and YouTube for Political Expression. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 1159–1168. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.10.008
Haro-de-Rosario, A., Sáez-Martín, A. & del Carmen Caba-Pérez, M. (2018). Using Social Media to Enhance Citizen Engagement with Local Government: Twitter or Facebook? New Media & Society, 20(1), 29–49. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816645652
He, B. (2006). Western Theories of Deliberative Democracy and the Chinese Practice of Complex Deliberative Governance. In E. Leib & B. He (Eds.), The Search for Deliberation Democracy in China (pp. 133–148). Palgrave MacMillan.
Hong, Y. & Rojas, H. (2016). Agreeing Not to Disagree: Iterative versus Episodic Forms of Political Participatory Behaviors. International Journal of Communication, 10, 1743–1763.
Hyun, K. D. (2018). The Role of Political Agreement and Disagreement of News and Political Discussion on Social Media for Political Participation. Analyses & Alternatives, 2(2), 31–66. Online: https://koreascience.kr/article/JAKO201812263806307.pdf
Huckfeldt, R., Johnson, P. E. & Sprague, J. (2004a). Political Disagreement: The Survival of Diverse Opinions within Communication Networks. Cambridge University Press.
Huckfeldt, R., Mendez, J. M. & Osborn, T. (2004b). Disagreement, Ambivalence, and Engagement: The Political Consequences of Heterogeneous Networks. Political Psychology, 25(1), 65–95. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00357.x
Innes, J. E. & Booher, D. E. (2003). Collaborative Policymaking: Governance through Dialogue. In M. a.
Hajer & H. Wagenaar (Eds.), Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society (pp. 33–59). Cambridge University Press.
Jørgensen, F., Bor, A. & Petersen, M. B. (2021). Compliance Without Fear: Individual-Level Protective Behavior During the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic. British Journal of Health Psychology, 26(2), 679–696. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12519
Kachanoff, F. J., Bigman, Y. E., Kapsaskis, K. & Gray, K. (2021). Measuring Realistic and Symbolic Threats of COVID-19 and Their Unique Impacts on Well-Being and Adherence to Public Health Behaviors. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12(5), 603–616. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620931634
Kim, Y., Hsu, S.-H. & Gil de Zúniga, H. (2013). Influence of Social Media Use on Discussion Network Heterogeneity and Civic Engagement: The Moderating Role of Personality Traits. Journal of Communication, 63(3), 498–516. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12034
Klofstad, C. A., Sokhey, A. E. & McClurg, S. D. (2013). Disagreeing about Disagreement: How Conflict in Social Networks Affects Political Behavior. American Journal of Political Science, 57(1), 120–134. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2012.00620.x
Kuyper, J. W. (2018). The Instrumental Value of Deliberative Democracy – Or, Do We Have Good Reasons to Be Deliberative Democrats? Journal of Public Deliberation, 14(1). Online: https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.291
Laden, A. S. (2012). Reasoning: A Social Picture. Oxford University Press.
Lee, F. L. (2012). Does Discussion with Disagreement Discourage All Types of Political Participation? Survey Evidence from Hong Kong. Communication Research, 39(4), 543–562. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650211398356
Lee, H., Kwak, N. & Campbell, S. W. (2015). Hearing the Other Side Revisited: The Joint Workings of Cross-Cutting Discussion and Strong Tie Homogeneity in Facilitating Deliberative and Participatory Democracy. Communication Research, 42(4), 569–596. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650213483824
Lilleker, D., Coman, I. A., Gregor, M. & Novelli, E. (2021). Political Communication and COVID-19: Governance and Rhetoric in Global Comparative Perspective. In Political Communication and COVID-19: Governance and Rhetoric in Times of Crisis (pp. 333–350). Routledge.
Liu, B. F., Bartz, L. & Duke, N. (2016). Communicating Crisis Uncertainty: A Review of the Knowledge Gaps. Public Relations Review, 42(3), 479–487. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2016.03.003
Lu, Y., Heatherly, K. A. & Lee, J. K. (2016). Cross-Cutting Exposure on Social Networking Sites: The Effects of SNS Discussion Disagreement on Political Participation. Computers in Human Behavior, 59, 74–81. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.01.030
Maia, R. C., Hauber, G., Choucair, T. & Crepalde, N. J. (2021). What Kind of Disagreement Favors Reason-Giving? Analyzing Online Political Discussions across the Broader Public Sphere. Political Studies, 69(1), 108–128. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321719894708
Maia, R. C. M. & Rezende, T. A. S. (2016). Respect and Disrespect in Deliberation across the Networked Media Environment: Examining Multiple Paths of Political Talk. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 21(2), 121–139. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12155
Mansbridge, J., Bohman, J., Chambers, S., Christiano, T., Fung, A., Parkinson, J., Thompson, D. F. & Warren, M. E. (2012). A Systemic Approach to Deliberative Democracy. In J. Parkinson & J. Mansbridge (Eds.), Deliberative Systems (pp. 1–26). Cambridge University Press.
Marien, S. & Hooghe, M. (2021). Does Political Trust Matter? An Empirical Investigation into the Relation Between Political Trust and Support for law Compliance. European Journal of Political Research, 50(2), 267–291. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2010.01930.x
Masullo Chen, G., Muddiman, A., Wilner, T., Pariser, E. & Stroud, N. J. (2019) We Should Not Get Rid of Incivility Online. Social Media + Society, 5(3). Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119862641
McClurg, S. D. (2006a). The Electoral Relevance of Political Talk: Examining Disagreement and Expertise Effects in Social Networks on Political Participation. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 737–754. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00213.x
McClurg, S. D. (2006b). Political Disagreement in Context: The Conditional Effect of Neighborhood Context, Disagreement, and Political Talk on Electoral Participation. Political Behavior, 28, 349–366. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-006-9015-4
McLeod, J. M. & Lee, N. J. (2012). Social Networks, Public Discussion and Civic Engagement: A Socialization Perspective. In H. A. Semetko & M. Scammell (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Political Communication (pp. 197–208). Sage.
Melville, A., Yu., Malgin, A.V., Mironyuk, M. G. & Stukal, D. K. (2023). “Political Atlas of the Modern World 2.0”: Formulation of the Research Problem. Polis. Political Studies, 2, 72–87. Online: https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2023.02.06
Moy, P. & Gastil, J. (2006). Predicting Deliberative Conversation: The Impact of Discussion Networks, Media Use, and Political Cognitions. Political Communication, 23(4), 443–460. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600600977003
Mutz, D. C. (2002a). Cross-Cutting Social Networks: Testing Democratic Theory in Practice. American Political Science Review, 96(1), 111–126.
Mutz, D. C. (2002b). The Consequences of Cross-Cutting Networks for Political Participation. American Journal of Political Science, 46(4), 838–855.
Mutz, D. C. (2006). Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative versus Participatory Democracy. Cambridge University Press.
Nikolov, D., Oliveira, D. F. M., Flammini, A. & Menczer, F. (2015). Measuring Online Social Bubbles. Peer Computer Science, 1, e38. Online: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.38
Nir, L. (2005). Ambivalent Social Networks and Their Consequences for Participation. International Journal for Public Opinion Research, 17(4), 422–442. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edh069
Nizomutdinov, B. A. & Filatova, O. G. (2023). Testing Methods for Processing Comments from Telegram Channels and Public VKontakte to Analyze the Social Media. International Journal of Open Information Technologies, 11(5), 137–145.
Page, B. I. (1996). Who Deliberates? Mass Media in Modern Democracy. University of Chicago Press.
Pattie, C. J. & Johnston, R. J. (2009). Conversation, Disagreement and Political Participation. Political Behavior, 31(2), 261–285. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-008-9071-z
Picazo-Vela, S., Gutiérrez-Martínez, I. & Luna-Reyes, L. F. (2012). Understanding Risks, Benefits, and Strategic Alternatives of Social Media Applications in the Public Sector. Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), 504–511. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.07.002
Pradel, F., Zilinsky, J., Kosmidis, S. & Theocharis, Y. (2024). Toxic Speech and Limited Demand for Content Moderation on Social Media. American Political Science Review, 118(4), 1895–1912. Online: https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305542300134X
Price, V., Nir, L. & Capella, J. N. (2002). Does Disagreement Contribute to More Deliberative Opinion? Political Communication, 19(1), 95–112. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/105846002317246506
Price, V., Nir, L. & Capella, J. N. (2006). Normative and Informational Influences in Online Political Discussions. Communication Theory, 16(1), 47–74. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00005.x
Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Simon & Shuster.
Raude, J., Lecrique J-M., Lasbeur, L., Leon, C., Guignard, R., du Roscoät, E. & Arwidson, P. (2020). Determinants of Preventive Behaviors in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic in France: Comparing the Sociocultural, Psychosocial, and Social Cognitive Explanations. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. Online: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.584500
Rojas, H. (2008). Strategy Versus Understanding: How Orientations toward Political Conversation Influence Political Engagement. Communication Research, 35(4), 452–480. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650208315977
Rossini, P. & Maia, R. (2021). Characterizing Disagreement in Online Political Talk: Examining Incivility and Opinion Expression on News Websites and Facebook in Brazil. Journal of Deliberative Democracy, 17(1), 90–104. Online: https://doi.org/10.16997/10.16997/jdd.967
Savin, N. (2019). Does Media Matter? Variation of VK and Facebook Deliberative Capacities (evidence from Discussions on the Crimea Crisis). Communications. Media. Design, 4(3), 119–139.
Scheufele, D. A., Nisbet, M. C., Brossard, D. & Nisbet, E. C. (2004). Social Structure and Citizenship: Examining the Impacts of Social Setting, Network Heterogeneity and Informational Variables on Political Participation. Political Communication, 21(3), 315–338. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600490481389
Schraff, D. (2020). Political Trust During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Rally around the Flag or Lockdown Effects? European Journal of Political Research, 60, 1007–1017. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12425
Shin, B. & Rask, M. (2021). Assessment of Online Deliberative Quality: New Indicators Using Network Analysis and Time-Series Analysis. Sustainability, 13(3). Online: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031187
Sibley, C.G., et al. (2020). Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Nationwide Lockdown on Trust, Attitudes Toward Government, and Well-Being. American Psychologist, 75(5), 618–630. Online: https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000662
Steffensmeier, T. & Schenk-Hamlin, W. (2008). Argument Quality in Public Deliberations. Argumentation and Advocacy, 45(1), 21–36. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/00028533.2008.11821693
Strandberg, K. & Grönlund, K. (2018). Online Deliberation: – An Overview of the Central Aspects of a Growing Research Field. In A. Bächtiger, J. S. Dryzek, J. Mansbridge & M. E. Warren (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy (pp. 365–377). Oxford University Press.
Strickler, R. (2018). Deliberate with the Enemy? Polarization, Social Identity, and Attitudes toward Disagreement. Political Research Quarterly, 71(1), 3–18. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912917721371
Stromer-Galley, J. (2007). Measuring Deliberation’s Content: A Coding Scheme. Journal of Public Deliberation, 3(1). Online: https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.50
Stromer-Galley, J., Bryant, L. & Bimber, B. (2015). Context and Medium Matter: Expressing Disagreements Online and Face-to-Face in Political Deliberations. Journal of Public Deliberation, 11(1). Online: https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.218
Stromer-Galley, J. & Muhlberger, P. (2009). Agreement and Disagreement in Group Deliberation: Effects on Deliberation Satisfaction, Future Engagement, and Decision Legitimacy. Political Communication, 26(2), 173–192. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600902850775
Stukal, D., Sanovich, S., Bonneau, R. & Tucker, J. A. (2017). Detecting Bots on Russian Political Twitter. Big Data, 5(4), 310–324. Online: https://doi.org/10.1089/big.2017.0038
Stukal, D., Sanovich, S., Tucker, J. A. & Bonneau, R. (2019). For Whom the Bot Tolls: A Neural Networks Approach to Measuring Political Orientation of Twitter Bots in Russia. Sage Open, 9(2). Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019827715
Sunstein, C. R. (2001). Republic.Com. Princeton University Press.
Sunstein, C. R. (2017). #Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media. Princeton University Press.
Taylor, S. (2019). The Psychology of Pandemics: Preparing for the Next Global Outbreak of Infectious Disease. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publications.
Theocharis, Y., Barberá, P., Fazekas, Z. & Popa, S. A. (2020). The Dynamics of Political Incivility on Twitter. Sage Open, 10(2). Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020919447
Torfing, J., Sørensen, E. & Røiseland, A. (2019). Transforming the Public Sector into an Arena for Co-Creation:
Barriers, Drivers, Benefits, and Ways Forward. Administration & Society, 51(5), 795–825. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399716680057
Volkovskii, D. & Filatova, O. (2022a). Agreement and Disagreement in American Social Media Discussions (Evidence from Facebook Discussions on the Second Impeachment of D. Trump). In L. Amaral, D. Soares & L. Zheng (Eds.), ICEGOV 2022: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (pp. 221–228). Association for Computing Machinery.
Volkovskii, D., Filatova, O. (2022b). Influence of Media Type on Political E-Discourse: Analysis of Russian and American Discussions on Social Media. In A. V. Chugunov, M. Janssen, I. Khodachek, Y. Misnikov & D. Trutnev (Eds.), Electronic Governance and Open Society. Challenges in Eurasia – 8th International Conference, EGOSE 2021, Proceedings. (pp. 119–131) Springer Nature. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04238-6_10
Volkovskii, D. & Filatova, O. (2023). Low Civility and High Incivility in Russian Online Deliberation: A Case of Political Talk in VKontakte Social Network. KOME, 11(1), 95–109. Online: https://doi.org/10.17646/KOME.2023.1.4
Volkovskii, D., Filatova, O., Bodrunova, S. & Bolgov, R. (2024). Does Government Hear Citizenry? The Quality of Deliberative Practice between Authorities and Citizens on Social Media in Russia. In S. Chun & G. Karuri-Sebina (Eds.), Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (ICEGOV ’24) (pp. 327–336). Association for Computing Machinery.
Volkovskii, D., Filatova, O. & Bolgov, R. (2023). Automated Detection of Different Publication Patterns of Online Deliberation as a Research Domain. In A. Coman & S. Vasilache (Eds.), Social Computing and Social Media: 15th International Conference, SCSM 2023, Held as Part of the 25th HCI International Conference, HCII 2023, Copenhagen, Denmark, July 23–28, 2023, Proceedings, Part I (pp. 146–163). Springer Nature. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35915-6_12
Warren, M. E. (2017). A Problem-Based Approach to Democratic Theory. American Political Science Review, 111(1), 39–53. Online: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055416000605
Weeks, B. E., Lane, D. S., Kim, D. H., Lee, S. S. & Kwak, N. (2017). Incidental Exposure, Selective Exposure, and Political Information Sharing: Integrating Online Exposure Patterns and Expression on Social Media. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(6), 363–379. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12199
Wojcieszak, M., Baek, Y. M. & Delli Carpini, M. X. (2009). What is Really Going On? Structure Underlying Face-to-Face and Online Deliberation. Information, Communication & Society, 12(7), 1080–1102. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180902725768
Wojcieszak, M. E. & Mutz, D.C. (2009). Online Groups and Political Discourse: Do Online Discussion Spaces Facilitate Exposure to Political Disagreement? Journal of Communication, 59(1), 40–56. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01403.x
Wojcieszak, M. & Price, V. (2010). Bridging the Divide or Intensifying the Conflict? How Disagreement Affects Strong Predilections About Sexual Minorities. Political Psychology, 31(3), 315–339. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2009.00753.x
Wojcieszak, M. & Price, V. (2012). Perceived versus Actual Disagreement: Which Influences Deliberative Experiences? Journal of Communication, 62(3), 418–436. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460‑2466.2012.01645.x
Yang, J., Barnidge, M. & Rojas, H. (2017). The Politics of “Unfriending”: User Filtration in Response to Political Disagreement on Social Media. Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 22–29. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.079
Yardi, S. & Boyd, D. (2010). Dynamic Debates: An Analysis of Group Polarization over Time on Twitter. Bulletin of Science. Technology & Society, 30(5), 316–327. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467610380011
Zhang, X., Lin, W.-Y. & Dutton, W. H. (2022). The Political Consequences of Online Disagreement: The Filtering of Communication Networks in a Polarized Political Context. Social Media + Society, 8(3). Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221114391
Zinnatullin, A. (2023). Political Discussions in Online Oppositional Communities in the Non-Democratic Context. Computational Communication Research, 5(1). Online: https://doi.org/10.5117/CCR2023.1.7.ZINN
"
["copyrightYear"]=>
int(2025)
["issueId"]=>
int(639)
["licenseUrl"]=>
string(43) "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0"
["pub-id::doi"]=>
string(19) "10.17646/KOME.of.25"
["abstract"]=>
array(1) {
["en_US"]=>
string(1313) "
PDF
This article provides an overview of current studies dedicated to agreement and disagreement in online deliberation, and explains the relevance and challenges of exploring political disagreement in the digital sphere. Two dominant approaches to understanding disagreement that have existed since the early 2000s are defined that have provoked an acute scientific debate on the ambiguous impacts of disagreement on deliberative process and the participatory activity of citizens. A literature review outlines three main groups of works on the consequences of disagreement. This article contributes to the field of political communication in several ways. First, the current gaps in studying agreement and disagreement and their impact on political communication are indicated. Second, future Research venues are proposed according to detected lacunas. Third, an explanation is provided of why the issue of disagreement in the field of political communication is so complex to study. Fourth, the methodologies for analysing agreement and disagreement in online deliberation, including computational methods of textanalysis, are highlighted. Based on a methodological review, the parameters for agreement and disagreement analysis in political discussions are summarised and tested through empirical research.
" } ["copyrightHolder"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(17) "Volkovskii Daniil" } ["prefix"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(3) "The" } ["subtitle"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(79) "Current Research Directions and Methods in the Field of Political Communication" } ["title"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(73) "Tricky Bits of Studying Agreement and Disagreement in Online Deliberation" } ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["authors"]=> array(1) { [0]=> object(Author)#1118 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(11) { ["id"]=> int(9335) ["email"]=> string(28) "daniil.volkovskii@yandex.com" ["includeInBrowse"]=> bool(true) ["publicationId"]=> int(7445) ["seq"]=> int(0) ["userGroupId"]=> int(339) ["country"]=> string(2) "FR" ["affiliation"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(27) "a:1:{s:5:"en_US";s:2:"Mr";}" ["hu_HU"]=> string(27) "a:1:{s:5:"en_US";s:2:"Mr";}" } ["familyName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(10) "Volkovskii" ["hu_HU"]=> string(10) "Volkovskii" } ["givenName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(6) "Daniil" ["hu_HU"]=> string(6) "Daniil" } ["submissionLocale"]=> string(5) "en_US" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } ["keywords"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> array(6) { [0]=> string(23) "political communication" [1]=> string(19) "public deliberation" [2]=> string(23) "political participation" [3]=> string(9) "agreement" [4]=> string(12) "disagreement" [5]=> string(12) "social media" } } ["subjects"]=> array(0) { } ["disciplines"]=> array(0) { } ["languages"]=> array(0) { } ["supportingAgencies"]=> array(0) { } ["galleys"]=> array(1) { [0]=> object(ArticleGalley)#1134 (7) { ["_submissionFile"]=> NULL ["_data"]=> array(9) { ["submissionFileId"]=> int(40707) ["id"]=> int(6378) ["isApproved"]=> bool(false) ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["label"]=> string(3) "PDF" ["publicationId"]=> int(7445) ["seq"]=> int(0) ["urlPath"]=> string(0) "" ["urlRemote"]=> string(0) "" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(true) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) }The Basis and Practice of Crisis Communication for Critical Health Infrastructure in Selected Institutions of the Hungarian Health Sector
object(Publication)#1125 (6) {
["_data"]=>
array(28) {
["id"]=>
int(8520)
["accessStatus"]=>
int(0)
["lastModified"]=>
string(19) "2025-08-14 11:20:16"
["primaryContactId"]=>
int(10892)
["sectionId"]=>
int(133)
["seq"]=>
int(0)
["submissionId"]=>
int(8395)
["status"]=>
int(5)
["version"]=>
int(1)
["categoryIds"]=>
array(0) {
}
["citationsRaw"]=>
string(9858) "Ashworth, I., El Dali, A., ElDeib, O., Altoub, A., Pasha, F. & Butt, T. (2015). Variability of Emergency Color Codes for Critical Events between Hospitals in Riyadh. Annals of Saudi Medicine, 35(6), 450–455. Online: https://doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2015.450
Avidan, V., Hersch, M., Spira, R. M., Einav, Sh., Goldberg, S. & Schecter, W. (2007). Civilian Hospital Response to a Mass Casualty Event: The Role of the Intensive Care Unit. The Journal of Trauma, 62(5), 1234–1239.
Online: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ta.0000210483.04535.e0
Bang, H. N. (2020). An Overview of the Covid-19 Crisis Management in Cameroon: Decentralised Governance Response Needed. Annals of Disaster Risk Sciences, 3(2). Online: https://doi.org/10.51381/adrs.v3i2.34
Boin, A. & McConnell, A. (2007). Preparing for Critical Infrastructure Breakdowns: The Limits of Crisis Management and the Need for Resilience. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 15(1), 50–59. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5973.2007.00504.x
Bradley, D. T., McFarland, M. & Clarke, M. (2014). The Effectiveness of Disaster Risk Communication: A Systematic Review of Intervention Studies. PLoS Currents, 6. Online: https://doi.org/10.1371/currents.dis.349062e0db1048bb9fc3a3fa67d8a4f8
British Columbia Ministry of Health Services (s. a.). Standardized Hospital Colour Codes of British Columbia. Online: https://www2.gov.bc.ca/assets/gov/health/keeping-bc-healthysafe/health-emergency-response/standardized-hospital-colour-codes.pdf
Burnham, G. M. (2008). Disaster Definitions. In G. M. Burnham & E. C. Rand (Eds.), The Johns Hopkins and Red Cross and Red Crescent Public Health Guide in Emergencies (pp. 24–43). International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies.
Camacho, G. A., Cabello Cano, S. & Castillo Cruz, R. (2019). The Virtual Center of Operations in Emergencies and Disasters. Inter-American Conference on Social Security.
Comfort, L. K. (Ed.). (1988). Managing Disaster. Strategies and Policy Perspectives. Duke University Press.
Coombs, W. T. (1999). Ongoing Crisis Communication. Planning, Managing and Responding. Sage.
Council Directive 2008/114/EC of 8 December 2008 on the Identification and Designation of European Critical Infrastructures and the Assessment of the Need to Improve Their Protection
Curtin, T., Hayman, D. & Husein, N. (2005). Managing Crisis. A Practical Guide. Palgrave Macmillan.
Dauksewicz, B. W. (2019). Hospitals Should Replace Emergency Codes with Plain Language. Journal of Healthcare Risk Management, 38(3), 32–41. Online: https://doi.org/10.1002/jhrm.21346
De Calheiros Velozo, J. & Stauder, J. E. A. (2018). Exploring Social Media Use as a Composite Construct to Understand Its Relation to Mental Health: A Pilot Study on Adolescents. Children and Youth Services Review, 91, 398–402. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.06.039
Dickmann, P., Biedenkopf, N., Keeping, S., Eickmann, M. & Becker, S. (2010). Risk Communication and Crisis Communication in Infectious Disease Outbreaks in Germany: What Is Being Done, and What Needs to be Done. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, 8(3), 206–211. Online: https://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2014.36
Dobosz, S. (2020). Crisis, Communication, and Canadian Hospitals: An Analysis and Evaluation of Risk Preparedness and Crisis Communication Efforts of Ontario Hospitals. Canadian Journal of Communication, 45(3), 365–385. Online: https://doi.org/10.22230/cjc.2020v45n3a3591
EMMI Decree 43/2014 (VIII. 19.) on the Content Requirements of Healthcare Crisis Plans for Healthcare Institutions and the Amendment of Certain Ministerial Decrees on Health
FACT24 (2023, October 26). Product Overview. Online: https://fact24.f24.com/en/product/fact24-ens/
García-Betances, R. I. & Huerta, M. K. (2012). A Review of Automatic Patient Identification Options for Public Health Care Centers with Restricted Budgets. Online Journal of Public Health Informatics, 4(1), 1947–2579. Online: https://doi.org/10.5210/ojphi.v4i1.4011
Government Decision 2080/2008 (VI. 30.) on the National Program for Critical Infrastructure Protection
Government Decision 1249/2010 (XI. 19.) on Government Tasks to Be Carried Out to Comply with Council
Directive 2008/114/EC of 8 December 2008 on the Identification and Designation of European Critical Infrastructures and the Assessment of the Need to Improve Their Protection
Government Decree 65/2013 (III. 8.) on the Implementation of Act CLXVI of 2012 on the Identification, Designation, and Protection of Critical Systems and Facilities
Haddow, K. S. & Haddow, G. (2008). Disaster Communications in a Changing Media World. Butterworth-Heinemann.
Hanák, T. (2008). Katasztrófajelentési rendszerek. Hadmérnök, 3(2), 29–39. Online: http://hadmernok.hu/archivum/2008/2/2008_2_hanak.pdf
Hutchins, H. M., Annulis, H. & Gaudet, C. (2008). Crisis Planning: Survey Results from Hurricane Katrina and Implications for Performance Improvement Professionals. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 20(3–4), 27– 51. Online: https://doi.org/10.1002/piq.20002
Kardos, T. Zs. (2021). Az Egységes Digitális Rádió-távközlő Rendszer (EDR) továbbfejlesztési lehetőségei. Rendvédelem, 10(3), 12–18. Online: https://doi.org/10.53793/RV.2021.3.2
Kátai-Urbán, L., Mészáros, I. & Vass, Gy. (2019). Iparbiztonság, válsághelyzeti tervezés. In L. Major (Ed.), A katasztrófa-készenlét, a reagálás és a beavatkozásbiztonság egészségügyi alapjai (pp. 73–74). Semmelweis Kiadó.
Kátai-Urbán, L., Mészáros, I. & Vass, Gy. (2021). Egészségügyi kritikus infrastruktúrák biztonsága a koronavírus árnyékában. In Gy. Gaál & Z. Hautzinger (Eds.), Rendészet a rendkívüli helyzetekben: húsz éves a Szent László napi konferencia (pp. 87–97). Magyar Hadtudományi Társaság Határőr Szakosztály Pécsi Szakcsoport.
Kuris, Z. (2010). Az egységes digitális rádiórendszer (EDR) alkalmazásának lehetőségei a rendészeti szerveknél. Hadmérnök, 5(2), 310–321. Online: http://hadmernok.hu/2010_2_kuris.pdf
Lando, A. L. (2014). The Critical Role of Crisis Communication Plan in Corporations’ Crises Preparedness and Management. Global Media Journal, 7(1), 5–19.
Lee, H. J. & Lee, O. (2018). Perceptions of Hospital Emergency Color Codes among Hospital Employees in Korea. International Emergency Nursing, 40, 6–11. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ienj.2018.03.005
Li, Y., Wang, X., Lin, X. & Hajli, M. (2018). Seeking and Sharing Health Information on Social Media: A Net Valence Model and Cross-Cultural Comparison. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 126, 28–40. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.07.021
Liu, B. F., Fowler, B. M., Roberts, H. A., Petrun Sayers, E. L. & Egnoto, M. J. (2017). The Role of Communication in Healthcare Systems and Community Resilience. International Journal of Emergency Management, 13(4), 305–327. Online: http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJEM.2017.087218
Mackway‐Jones, K. & Carley, S. (2019). Major Incident Medical Management and Support. The Practical Approach in the Hospital. Wiley Blackwell.
Marathon TERRA (s. a.). Felhasználói kézikönyv. Online: https://docplayer.hu/14006111-1-bevezetes-marathonterra-felhasznaloi-kezikonyv.html
Mógor, J. (2011). A lakossági tájékoztatás és a nyilvánosság biztosításának kutatása a súlyos ipari balesetek elleni védekezésben. PhD Dissertation. Zrínyi Miklós Nemzetvédelmi Egyetem Katonai Műszaki Doktori Iskola. Online: http://193.224.76.4/download/konyvtar/digitgy/phd/2010/mogor_judit.pdf
Nudell, M. & Antokol, N. (1988). The Handbook for Effective Emergency and Crisis Management. Lexington Books.
Polgári Veszélyhelyzeti Információs Rendszer (s. a.). Online: https://2010-2014.kormany.hu/hu/belugyminiszterium/gazdasagi-es-informatikai-helyettes-allamtitkarsag/hirek/polgari-veszelyhelyzeti-informaciosrendszer
Regester, M. & Larkin, J. (2002). Risk Issues and Crisis Management. A Casebook of Best Practice (2nd ed.). Kogan Page.
Reynolds, B. S. & Seeger, M. W. (2012). Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Riplinger, L., Piera-Jiménez, J. & Pursley Dooling, J. (2020). Patient Identification Techniques – Approaches, Implications, and Findings. Yearbook of Medical Informatics, 29(1), 81–86. Online: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1701984
Rosenthal, U., Boin, R. A. & Comfort, L. K. (2001). The Changing World of Crisis and Crisis Management. In U. Rosenthal, R. A. Boin & L. K. Comfort (Eds.), Managing Crises. Threats, Dilemmas and Opportunities (pp. 5–27). Charles C. Thomas.
Semmelweis Hírek (2020, December 7). Covid-informaciós vonalat hozott kétre a Semmelwis Egyetem a fekvőbetegek hozzátartozói részére. Semmelweis Egyetem Kommunikációs Igazgatósága. Online: https://semmelweis.hu/hirek/2020/12/07/covid-informacios-vonalat-hozott-letre-a-semmelweis-egyetema-fekvobetegek-hozzatartozoi-reszere/
Tase, T. H., Lourenção, D. C. A., Bianchini, S. M. & Tronchin, D. M. R. (2013). Patient Identification in Healthcare Organizations: An Emerging Debate. Revista Gaúcha de Enfermagem, 34(2), 196–200. Online: https://doi.org/10.1590/s1983-14472013000300025
‘t Hart, P. (1993). Symbols, Rituals and Power: The Lost Dimension in Crisis Management. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 1(1), 36–50. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5973.1993.tb00005.x
UN (2009). 2009 UNISDR Terminology on Disaster Risk Reduction. Online: http://www.undrr.org/quick/10973
Zaher, W. A., Faheem, A., Ganesan, S., Warren, K. & Koshy, A. (2021). Covid-19 Crisis Management: Lessons from the United Arab Emirates Leaders. Frontiers in Public Health, 9. Online: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.724494"
["copyrightYear"]=>
int(2025)
["issueId"]=>
int(639)
["licenseUrl"]=>
string(43) "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0"
["pub-id::doi"]=>
string(19) "10.17646/KOME.of.29"
["abstract"]=>
array(1) {
["en_US"]=>
string(908) "
PDF
Critical system elements in the healthcare system operate continuously under all circumstances, which has implications for emergency planning in ensuring operational safety for system elements, minimising the occurrence of any incidents, and ensuring continued operation regardless of extraordinary events. This research involved a questionnaire survey of designated critical infrastructure in the Hungarian health sector, a review of crisis planning documents, and an exploration of practical experience and methodologies. The research identified infocommunication tools, systems, channels and methods that can be used with a currently appropriate level of technology and security in alerting, notifying and equipping participants in health care operations during crises, as well as for communication and messaging activities between intervention forces in the care environment and society generally.
" } ["copyrightHolder"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(140) "László Christián, István Mészáros, Maxim Kátai-Urbán, Mátyás Simon, Tamás Palicz, Balázs Gergely Tiszolczi, János József Tóth" } ["prefix"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(3) "The" } ["subtitle"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" } ["title"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(133) "Basis and Practice of Crisis Communication for Critical Health Infrastructure in Selected Institutions of the Hungarian Health Sector" } ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["authors"]=> array(7) { [0]=> object(Author)#1128 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(15) { ["id"]=> int(10892) ["email"]=> string(27) "christian.laszlo@uni-nke.hu" ["includeInBrowse"]=> bool(true) ["publicationId"]=> int(8520) ["seq"]=> int(0) ["userGroupId"]=> int(339) ["country"]=> string(2) "HU" ["orcid"]=> string(37) "https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9809-4890" ["url"]=> string(0) "" ["affiliation"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(37) "Ludovika University of Public Service" } ["biography"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(205) "Department of Private Security and Municipal Policing, Ludovika University of Public Service, Budapest,
Hungary; Fulbright Visiting Scholar, Metropolitan State University of Denver, United States
Department of Military, Disaster and Law Enforcement Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
" } ["familyName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(10) "Mészáros" } ["givenName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(7) "István" } ["preferredPublicName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(18) "István Mészáros" } ["submissionLocale"]=> string(5) "en_US" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } [2]=> object(Author)#1141 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(15) { ["id"]=> int(10894) ["email"]=> string(31) "katai.urban.maxim@semmelweis.hu" ["includeInBrowse"]=> bool(true) ["publicationId"]=> int(8520) ["seq"]=> int(0) ["userGroupId"]=> int(339) ["country"]=> string(2) "HU" ["orcid"]=> string(37) "https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5079-4644" ["url"]=> string(0) "" ["affiliation"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(21) "Semmelweis University" } ["biography"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(83) "Directorate of Security Technology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
" } ["familyName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(13) "Kátai-Urbán" } ["givenName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(5) "Maxim" } ["preferredPublicName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(19) "Maxim Kátai-Urbán" } ["submissionLocale"]=> string(5) "en_US" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } [3]=> object(Author)#1135 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(15) { ["id"]=> int(10895) ["email"]=> string(26) "simon.matyas@semmelweis.hu" ["includeInBrowse"]=> bool(true) ["publicationId"]=> int(8520) ["seq"]=> int(0) ["userGroupId"]=> int(339) ["country"]=> string(2) "HU" ["orcid"]=> string(37) "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2714-857X" ["url"]=> string(0) "" ["affiliation"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(21) "Semmelweis University" } ["biography"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(83) "Directorate of Security Technology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
" } ["familyName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(5) "Simon" } ["givenName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(8) "Mátyás" } ["preferredPublicName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(14) "Mátyás Simon" } ["submissionLocale"]=> string(5) "en_US" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } [4]=> object(Author)#1147 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(15) { ["id"]=> int(10896) ["email"]=> string(30) "palicz.tamas@emk.semmelweis.hu" ["includeInBrowse"]=> bool(true) ["publicationId"]=> int(8520) ["seq"]=> int(0) ["userGroupId"]=> int(339) ["country"]=> string(2) "HU" ["orcid"]=> string(37) "https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3676-2878" ["url"]=> string(0) "" ["affiliation"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(21) "Semmelweis University" } ["biography"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(91) "Health Services Management Training Centre, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
" } ["familyName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(6) "Palicz" } ["givenName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(6) "Tamás" } ["preferredPublicName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(13) "Tamás Palicz" } ["submissionLocale"]=> string(5) "en_US" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } [5]=> object(Author)#1146 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(15) { ["id"]=> int(10897) ["email"]=> string(35) "tiszolczi.balazs.gergely@uni-nke.hu" ["includeInBrowse"]=> bool(true) ["publicationId"]=> int(8520) ["seq"]=> int(0) ["userGroupId"]=> int(339) ["country"]=> string(2) "HU" ["orcid"]=> string(37) "https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6708-0138" ["url"]=> string(0) "" ["affiliation"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(37) "Ludovika University of Public Service" } ["biography"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(149) "Department of Private Security and Municipal Policing, Faculty of Law Enforcement, Ludovika University of
Public Service, Budapest, Hungary
Office for Science Strategy, Ludovika University of Public Service, Budapest, Hungary
" } ["familyName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(5) "Tóth" } ["givenName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(14) "János József" } ["preferredPublicName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(20) "János József Tóth" } ["submissionLocale"]=> string(5) "en_US" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } ["keywords"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> array(5) { [0]=> string(23) "critical infrastructure" [1]=> string(17) "healthcare sector" [2]=> string(20) "crisis communication" [3]=> string(19) "emergency situation" [4]=> string(38) "alerting and mobilisation technologies" } } ["subjects"]=> array(0) { } ["disciplines"]=> array(0) { } ["languages"]=> array(0) { } ["supportingAgencies"]=> array(0) { } ["galleys"]=> array(1) { [0]=> object(ArticleGalley)#1132 (7) { ["_submissionFile"]=> NULL ["_data"]=> array(9) { ["submissionFileId"]=> int(41582) ["id"]=> int(6481) ["isApproved"]=> bool(false) ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["label"]=> string(3) "PDF" ["publicationId"]=> int(8520) ["seq"]=> int(0) ["urlPath"]=> string(0) "" ["urlRemote"]=> string(0) "" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(true) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) }Public Perceptions of People-Centric Political Actions A Qualitative Analysis of the Views of Hungarian Adults on Political Elite Measures
object(Publication)#1121 (6) {
["_data"]=>
array(28) {
["id"]=>
int(8195)
["accessStatus"]=>
int(0)
["lastModified"]=>
string(19) "2025-09-05 14:58:14"
["primaryContactId"]=>
int(10433)
["sectionId"]=>
int(133)
["seq"]=>
int(0)
["submissionId"]=>
int(8071)
["status"]=>
int(5)
["version"]=>
int(1)
["categoryIds"]=>
array(0) {
}
["citationsRaw"]=>
string(14054) "AFP (2025, February 27). How Austria’s Far Right Is Shaping Its Own News Media Landscape. The Local. Online: https://www.thelocal.at/20250227/how-austrias-far-right-is-shaping-its-own-newsmedia-landscape
Akkerman, A., Mudde, C. & Zaslove, A. (2014). How Populist Are the People? Measuring Populist Attitudes in Voters. Comparative Political Studies, 47(9), 1324–1353. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414013512600
Albert, F. (2020). Hungary: Tax Exemption for Mothers of Four or More Children. European Commission. Online: https://ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=22505&langId=en
Anderson, B. (2006). Imagined Communities. Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. Verso.
BBC (2019, February 11). Hungary Tries for Baby Boom with Tax Breaks and Loan Forgiveness. BBC. Online: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-47192612
Benczes, I. (2016). From Goulash Communism to Goulash Populism: The Unwanted Legacy of Hungarian Reform Socialism. Post-Communist Economies, 28(2), 146–166. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2015.1124557
Bene, M. & Boda, Z. (2021). Hungary: Crisis as Usual – Populist Governance and the Pandemic. In G. Bobba & N. Hubé (Eds.), Populism and the Politicization of the Covid-19 Crisis in Europe (pp. 87–100). Palgrave Macmillan. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66011-6_7
Bene, M., Ceron, A., Fenoll, V., Haßler, J., Kruschinski, S., Larsson, A. O., Magin, M., Schlosser, K. & Wurst, A.-K. (2022). Keep Them Engaged! Investigating the Effects of Self-centered Social Media Communication
Style on User Engagement in 12 European Countries. Political Communication, 39(4), 429–453. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2022.2042435
Bíró-Nagy, A. (2022). Orbán’s Political Jackpot: Migration and the Hungarian Electorate. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 48(2), 405–424. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2020.1853905
Bobba, G. & Roncarolo, F. (2018). The Likeability of Populism on Social Media in the 2018 Italian General Election. Italian Political Science, 13(1), 51–62. Online: https://italianpoliticalscience.com/index.php/ips/article/view/32
Bonikowski, B. & Gidron, N. (2016). The Populist Style in American Politics: Presidential Campaign Discourse, 1952–1996. Social Forces, 94(4), 1593–1621. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sov120
Böröcz, J. (2012). Hungary in the European Union: ‘Catching Up’, Forever. Economic and Political Weekly, 47, 22–25.
Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. Online: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Canovan, M. (1984). ‘People’, Politicians and Populism. Government and Opposition, 19(3), 312–327. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.1984.tb01048.x
Castanho Silva, B., Jungkunz, S., Helbling, M. & Littvay, L. (2020). An Empirical Comparison of Seven Populist Attitudes Scales. Political Research Quarterly, 73(2), 409–424. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912919833176
Csigó, P. & Merkovity, N. (2016). Hungary: Home of Empty Populism. In T. Aalberg, F. Esser, C. Reinemann, J. Stromback & C. De Vreese (Ed.), Populist Political Communication in Europe (pp. 299–311). Routledge. Online: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315623016
De Nadal, L. (2020). On Populism and Social Movements: From the Indignados to Podemos. Social Movement Studies, 20(1), 36–56. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2020.1722626
Ditto, P. H. & Rodriguez, C. G. (2021). Populism and the Social Psychology of Grievance. In J. P. Forgas, W. D. Crano & K. Fiedler (Eds.), The Psychology of Populism (pp. 23–41). Routledge.
Dövényi, Z. (1994). Transition and Unemployment – The Case of Hungary. GeoJournal, 32(4), 393–398. Online: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41146181
Dunai, M. (2024, August 19). Why Hungary’s Lavish Family Subsidies Failed to Spur a Baby Boom. Financial Times. Online: https://www.ft.com/content/3ea257fd-e8ef-4f05-9b89-c9a03ea72af5
Eatwell, R. & Goodwin, M. (2018). National Populism. The Revolt against Liberal Democracy. Penguin Books. Engesser, S., Ernst, N., Esser, F. & Büchel, F. (2017). Populism and Social Media: How Politicians Spread a
Fragmented Ideology. Information, Communication & Society, 20(8), 1109–1126. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1207697
Erdélyi, P., Zöldi, B. & Sáling, G. (2018, March 28). The Moneyman of Bashar al-Assad and a Suspect of a Serious International Crime Participated in Hungary’s Golden Visa Program. Direkt 36. Online: https://www.direkt36.hu/en/sulyos-nemzetkozi-bunugy-gyanusitottja-es-a-sziriai-diktator-penzembere-ismagyar-papirokat-kapott-a-kotvenyprogramban/
Ernst, N., Esser, F., Blassnig, S. & Engesser, S. (2019). Favorable Opportunity Structures for Populist Communication: Comparing Different Types of Politicians and Issues in Social Media, Television and the Press. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 24(2), 165–188. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161218819430
ESS ERIC (2024). European Social Survey European Research Infrastructure (ESS ERIC) (2024) ESS11. Online: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21338/ess11e02_0
Everett, J. A. C. (2013). The 12 Item Social and Economic Conservatism Scale (SECS). PLoS One, 8(12). Online: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0082131
Hameleers, M. (2018). A Typology of Populism: Toward a Revised Theoretical Framework on the Sender Side and Receiver Side of Communication. International Journal of Communication, 12, 2171–2190. Online: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85075652654&partnerID=40&md5=2b2f15a03889aa38b620a27e047763fe
Hameleers, M. (2021). On the Ordinary People’s Enemies: How Politicians in the United States, the United ingdom, and the Netherlands Communicate Populist Boundaries Via Twitter and the Effects on Party references. Political Science Quarterly, 136(3), 487–519. Online: https://doi.org/10.1002/polq.13235
International Trade Administration (2024, March 22). Hungary Economic Development Extra-Profit Tax Phase ut. Online: https://www.trade.gov/market-intelligence/hungary-economic-development-extra-profittax-phase-out
Jagers, J. & Walgrave, S. (2007). Populism as Political Communication Style: An Empirical Study of Political arties’ Discourse in Belgium. European Journal of Political Research, 46(3), 319–345. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00690.x
Jost, J. T., Napier, J. L., Thorisdottir, H., Gosling, S. D., Palfai, T. P. & Ostafin, B. (2007). Are Needs to Manage Uncertainty and Threat Associated with Political Conservatism or Ideological Extremity? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(7), 989–1007. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207301028
Kazin, M. (1995). The Populist Persuasion. An American History. Cornell University Press.
Krekó, P. (2021). Populism in Power – The Tribal Challenge. In J. P. Forgas, W. D. Crano & K. Fiedler (Eds.), The Psychology of Populism. The Tribal Challenge to Liberal Democracy (pp. 240–257). Routledge.
KSH (2020). Munkanélküliség (2004–2019) [Unemployment (2004–2019)]. Online: https://www.ksh.hu/thm/2/indi2_3_2.html
KSH (2024). Születéskor várható átlagos élettartam, átlagéletkor nem, vármegye és régió szerint [Life Expectancy at Birth, Average Age at Death, by County and Region]. Online: https://www.ksh.hu/stadat_files/nep/hu/nep0039.html
KSH (2025). 4 millió 679 ezer fő volt a foglalkoztatottak száma, a munkanélküliségi ráta 4,5% [The Number of Employed Persons Was 4,679,000, and the Unemployment Rate Was 4.5%]. Online: https://www.ksh.hu/gyorstajekoztatok/fem/fem2411.html
Laclau, E. (1977). Politics and Ideology in Marxist Theory. Capitalism–Fascism–Populism. New Left Books.
Laclau, E. (2005a). On Populist Reason. Verso.
Laclau, E. (2005b). Populism: What’s in a Name. In F. Panizza (Ed.), Populism and the Mirror of Democracy (pp. 32–50). Verso.
Lantos, D. & Forgas, J. P. (2021). The Role of Collective Narcissism in Populist Attitudes and the Collapse of Democracy in Hungary. Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology, 5(2), 65–78. Online: https://doi.org/10.1002/jts5.80
Lin, J.-C., d’Haenens, L. & Liao, D. (2023). On Mainstream Parties’ Professionalized Use of Populist Communication on Social Networking Sites: An Analysis of Party Facebook Contents in Taiwan’s 2020 National Election. Media Asia, 50(4), 596–615. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/01296612.2023.2212502
Maier, M., Welzenbach-Vogel, I. C., Christner, C., Tillman, E. R., Zinkernagel, A. & Schmitt, M. (2023). Implicit and Explicit Populist and Anti-Immigrant Attitudes and Their Explanatory Power for Populist Radical-Right Party Support. Acta Politica, 58(3), 591–613. Online: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41269-022-00255-6
Miglbauer, M. (2023). Germany: Populist Conceptualisations as Drivers for Identity Formation and Expressing Support for the Alternative fur Deutschland (AfD). In V. Koller et al. (Eds.), Voices of Supporters. Populist
Parties, Social Media and the 2019 European Elections (pp. 35–57). John Benjamins Publishing Company. Online: https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.101.c3
Mouffe, C. (2018). For a Left Populism. Verso.
Mudde, C. (2004). The Populist Zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39(4), 541–563. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x
Mudde, C. (2017). Populism: An Ideational Approach. In C. Rovira Kaltwasser, P. Taggart, P. O. Espejo & P. Ostiguy (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Populism (pp. 27–47). Oxford University Press. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198803560.013.1
Ostiguy, P. (2017). Populism: A Socio-Cultural Approach. In C. Rovira Kaltwasser, P. Taggart, P. O. Espejo & P. Ostiguy (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Populism (pp. 73–97). Oxford University Press. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198803560.013.3
Palonen, E. (2009). Political Polarisation and Populism in Contemporary Hungary. Parliamentary Affairs, 62(2), 318–334. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsn048
Palonen, E. (2018). Performing the Nation: The Janus-faced Populist Foundations of Illiberalism in Hungary. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 26(3), 308–321. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2018.1498776
Parlament.hu (s. a.). Információk a Letelepedési Magyar Államkötvényről [Information about Hungarian Government Bonds for Settlement]. Online: https://www.parlament.hu/web/gazdasagi-bizottsag/informacio-a-letelepedesi-magyar-allamkotvenyrol
Publicus Research (2025, January 31). Pártok támogatottsága – 2025 január [Party Support – January 2025]. Online: https://publicus.hu/blog/partok-tamogatottsaga-2025-januar/
Pytlas, B. (2022). Beyond Populism: The Diversity of Thin Anti-Establishment Contestation in Turbulent Times. Party Politics, 29(4), 648–660. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688221080536
Scoggins, B. (2020). Identity Politics or Economics? Explaining Voter Support for Hungary’s Illiberal FIDESZ. East European Politics and Societies, 36(1), 3–28. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/0888325420954535
Taggart, P. (2000). Populism. Open University Press.
Theuwis, M.-I. (2024). Power to the People? How Participatory Budgets Affect Citizens’ Populist Attitudes. Political Studies, 73(2), 701–724. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/00323217241273590
Tóth, T. (2020). Target the Enemy: Explicit and Implicit Populism in the Rhetoric of the Hungarian Right. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 28(3), 366–386. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2020.1757415
Tóth, T., Goyanes, M. & Demeter, M. (2024). Extend the Context! Measuring Explicit and Implicit Populism on Three Different Textual Levels. Communications, 49(2), 222–242. Online: https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2022-0009
Tóth, T., Kékesdi-Boldog, D., Bokor, T. & Veczán, Z. (2019). “Protect Our Homeland!” Populist Communication in the 2018 Hungarian Election Campaign on Facebook. Central European Journal of Communication, 12(2), 169–186. Online: https://doi.org/10.19195/1899-5101.12.2(23).4
Tóth, T. & Lantos, D. (2024). When Crisis Unfolds: Relative Deprivation and Populist Attitudes in Hungary. Populism, 7(2), 197–225. Online: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1163/25888072-bja10066
Vas, A. (2024, December 28). Év végén is vezet a Tisza Párt, Menczer Tamás hőbörgése a fideszesek háromnegyedének sem tetszett [The Tisza Party Still Leads at the End of the Year, Tamás Menczer’s Ranting Did not Please Three-quarters of Fidesz Supporters Either]. Népszava. Online: https://nepszava.hu/3262987_magyarorszag-kozbeszed-politika-felmeres-menczer-tamas-magyar-peter-publicus-intezet
Versteegen, P. L. (2023). The Excluded Ordinary? A Theory of Populist Radical Right Supporters’ Position in Society. European Journal of Social Psychology, 53(7), 1327–1341. Online: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2977
Wettstein, M., Schulz, A., Steenbergen, M., Schemer, C., Müller, P., Wirz, D. S. & Wirth, W. (2020). Measuring Populism across Nations: Testing for Measurement Invariance of an Inventory of Populist Attitudes. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 32(2), 284–305. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edz018
Weyland, K. (2001). Clarifying a Contested Concept: Populism in the Study of Latin American Politics. Comparative Politics, 34(1), 1–22. Online: https://doi.org/10.2307/422412
Weyland, K. (2017). Populism: A Political-Strategic Approach. In C. Rovira Kaltwasser, P. Taggart, P. Ochoa Espejo & P. Ostiguy (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Populism (pp. 48–72). Oxford University Press. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198803560.013.2
Weyland, K. (2024). Democracy’s Resilience to Populism’s Threat. Countering Global Alarmism. Cambridge University Press.
Zsolt, P., Tóth, T. & Demeter, M. (2021). We Are the Ones Who Matter! Pro and Anti-Trumpists’ Attitudes in Hungary. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 30(4), 719–737. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2021.1992362
"
["copyrightYear"]=>
int(2025)
["issueId"]=>
int(639)
["licenseUrl"]=>
string(43) "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0"
["pub-id::doi"]=>
string(19) "10.17646/KOME.of.30"
["abstract"]=>
array(1) {
["en_US"]=>
string(728) "
PDF
People-centrism is one of the fundamental elements of populism. However, qualitative research that tries to interpret a specific part of the demand side of populism – the people’s perceptions of people-centrist political actions – is scarce. In this paper, therefore, we analyse the perceptions of Hungarian adults of the people-centrist measures conducted by the domestic political elite, and scrutinise a large dataset of semi-structured interviews (n = 109) through thematic content analysis. Our results suggest that respondents deemed three important political actions by the Hungarian political elite to be ‘people-centrist’: family subsidies, immigration policies and tax reductions for younger citizens.
" } ["additionalMetadatafield"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(222) "Funding: Tamás Tóth was supported by the EKÖP-24-4-II-1 University Research Scholarship Program of the Ministry of Culture and Innovation from the source of the National Research, Development and Innovation Fund.
" } ["copyrightHolder"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(26) "Tóth Tamás, Liszkay Aliz" } ["subtitle"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(83) "A Qualitative Analysis of the Views of Hungarian Adults on Political Elite Measures" } ["title"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(54) "Public Perceptions of People-Centric Political Actions" } ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["authors"]=> array(2) { [0]=> object(Author)#1143 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(15) { ["id"]=> int(10433) ["email"]=> string(22) "toth.tamas3@uni-nke.hu" ["includeInBrowse"]=> bool(true) ["publicationId"]=> int(8195) ["seq"]=> int(0) ["userGroupId"]=> int(339) ["country"]=> string(2) "HU" ["orcid"]=> string(37) "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5361-4300" ["url"]=> string(0) "" ["affiliation"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" ["hu_HU"]=> string(0) "" } ["biography"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" ["hu_HU"]=> string(0) "" } ["familyName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(5) "Tóth" ["hu_HU"]=> string(5) "Tóth" } ["givenName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(6) "Tamás" ["hu_HU"]=> string(6) "Tamás" } ["preferredPublicName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(12) "Tamás Tóth" } ["submissionLocale"]=> string(5) "en_US" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } [1]=> object(Author)#1133 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(15) { ["id"]=> int(10434) ["email"]=> string(21) "liziliszkay@gmail.com" ["includeInBrowse"]=> bool(true) ["publicationId"]=> int(8195) ["seq"]=> int(0) ["userGroupId"]=> int(339) ["country"]=> string(2) "HU" ["orcid"]=> string(0) "" ["url"]=> string(0) "" ["affiliation"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(66) "Corvinus University of Budapest, Political Economy Masters Program" } ["biography"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" } ["familyName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(7) "Liszkay" } ["givenName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(5) "Alíz" } ["preferredPublicName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(13) "Alíz Liszkay" } ["submissionLocale"]=> string(5) "en_US" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } ["keywords"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> array(6) { [0]=> string(8) "populism" [1]=> string(15) "people-centrism" [2]=> string(7) "Hungary" [3]=> string(24) "tematic content analysis" [4]=> string(26) "semi-structured interviews" [5]=> string(21) "political perceptions" } } ["subjects"]=> array(0) { } ["disciplines"]=> array(0) { } ["languages"]=> array(0) { } ["supportingAgencies"]=> array(0) { } ["galleys"]=> array(1) { [0]=> object(ArticleGalley)#1148 (7) { ["_submissionFile"]=> NULL ["_data"]=> array(9) { ["submissionFileId"]=> int(41892) ["id"]=> int(6512) ["isApproved"]=> bool(false) ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["label"]=> string(3) "PDF" ["publicationId"]=> int(8195) ["seq"]=> int(0) ["urlPath"]=> string(0) "" ["urlRemote"]=> string(0) "" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(true) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) }Green Label Investigating Environmental Labelling as a Communication Tool in Hungary
object(Publication)#1129 (6) {
["_data"]=>
array(27) {
["id"]=>
int(7917)
["accessStatus"]=>
int(0)
["lastModified"]=>
string(19) "2025-09-05 14:56:00"
["primaryContactId"]=>
int(10017)
["sectionId"]=>
int(133)
["seq"]=>
int(0)
["submissionId"]=>
int(7793)
["status"]=>
int(5)
["version"]=>
int(1)
["categoryIds"]=>
array(0) {
}
["citationsRaw"]=>
string(12487) "Albarracín, D. & McNatt, P. S. (2005). Maintenance and Decay of Past Behavior Influences: Anchoring Attitudes on Beliefs Following Inconsistent Actions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(6), 719–733. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204272180
Balabanis, G., Diamantopoulos, A., Mueller, R. D. & Melewar, T. C. (2001). The Impact of Nationalism, Patriotism, and Internationalism on Consumer Ethnocentric Tendencies. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(1), 157–175. Online: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490943
Bem, D. J. (1972). Self-Perception Theory. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (pp. 1–62). Academic Press. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60024-6
Berács, J. & Malota, E. (2000). Fogyasztói etnocentrizmus: Etnocentrizmus és országeredet-imázs kapcsolata a termékválasztásban. Vezetéstudomány, 31(4), 25–38.
Bosmans, A. M. M. & Warlop, L. (2005). How Vulnerable Are Consumers to Blatant Persuasion Attempts? Advances in Consumer Research, 32, 506. Online: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.869978
Brehm, S. S. & Brehm, J. W. (1981). Psychological Reactance. A Theory of Freedom and Control. Academic Press.
Carrico, A. R., Truelove, H. B., Vandenbergh, M. P. & Dana, D. (2015). Does Learning about Climate Change Adaptation Change Support for Mitigation? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 41, 19–29. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.10.009
Cialdini, R. B. (2003). Crafting Normative Messages to Protect the Environment. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(4), 105–109. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.01242
Cornelissen, G. (2007). Rendering Sustainable Consumer Behavior More Sustainable. Psychological Tools for Marketing Pro-Social Commitment. PhD Dissertation. Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.
Cornelissen, G., Dewitte, S., Warlop, L. & Yzerbyt, V. (2007). Whatever People Say I Am, That’s What I Am: Social Labeling as a Social Marketing Tool. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 24(4), 278–288. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2007.05.001
Cornelissen, G., Pandelaere, M., Warlop, L. & Dewitte, S. (2008). Positive Cueing: Promoting Sustainable Consumer Behavior by Cueing Common Environmental Behaviors as Environmental. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 25(1), 46–55. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2007.06.002
Cruz, S. M. (2017). The Relationships of Political Ideology and Party Affiliation with Environmental Concern: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 53, 81–91. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.06.010
Csanádi, A., Harsányi, Sz. G. & Szabó, É. (2009). Lezárási igény kérdőív: A Need for Closure Scale magyar verziójának tesztelése egyetemista mintán. Alkalmazott Pszichológia, 11(1–2), 55–81.
Dunlap, R. E. & McCright, A. M. (2008). A Widening Gap: Republican and Democratic Views on Climate Change. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 50(5), 26–35. Online: https://doi.org/10.3200/ENVT.50.5.26-35
Eby, B., Carrico, A. R. & Truelove, H. B. (2019). The Influence of Environmental Identity Labeling on the Uptake of Pro-Environmental Behaviors. Climatic Change, 155(4), 563–580. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02501-x
Fekete, B. (2022a). A környezetbarát cselekedetek pszichológiai háttere és ösztönzésének lehetőségei. In T. Dezső & I. Pócza (Eds.), Batthyány Lajos Alapítvány Doktori Ösztöndíjprogram Tanulmánykötet 2020/2021 (pp. 154–174). BLA Tudástár.
Fekete, B. (2022b). A fenntarthatóság rejtett motivációinak kvalitatív vizsgálata a magyar lakosság körében. In T. Dezső & I. Pócza (Eds.), Batthyány Lajos Alapítvány Doktori Ösztöndíjprogram Tanulmánykötet 2021/2022 (pp. 140–152). BLA Tudástár.
Festinger, L. (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford University Press.
Fielding, K. S. & Hornsey, M. J. (2016). A Social Identity Analysis of Climate Change and Environmental Attitudes and Behaviors: Insights and Opportunities. Frontiers in Psychology, 7. Online: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00121
Gilbert, D. T., Krull, D. S. & Malone, P. S. (1990). Unbelieving the Unbelievable: Some Problems in the Rejection of False Information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(4), 601–613. Online: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.4.601
Hámori, J. & Horváth, Á. (2009). A hazai élelmiszerek megítélésének és preferenciájának vizsgálata. Élelmiszer, Táplálkozás és Marketing, 6(2–3), 87–94.
Henn, L., Otto, S. & Kaiser, F. G. (2020). Positive Spillover: The Result of Attitude Change. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 69. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101429
Kahneman, D. (2012). Thinking, Fast and Slow. Penguin Books.
Kaiser, F. G. & Wilson, M. (2004). Goal-directed Conservation Behavior: The Specific Composition of a General Performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 36(7), 1531–1544. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2003.06.003
Lacasse, K. (2016). Don’t Be Satisfied, Identify! Strengthening Positive Spillover by Connecting Pro-Environmental Behaviors to an “Environmentalist” Label. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 48, 149–158. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.09.006
Magyar Termék Nonprofit Kft. (2017). A vevők többségének számít, hogy magyar élelmiszert vásároljon. Online: https://amag yartermek.hu/hirek/a-vevok-tobbsegenek-szamit-hog y-mag yar-elelmiszertvasaroljon/300/
Malota, E. (2003). A hazai termékek preferálása. Marketing és Menedzsment, 2(3), 28–37.
McCright, A. M., Dunlap, R. E. & Marquart-Pyatt, S. T. (2016). Political Ideology and Views about Climate Change in the European Union. Environmental Politics, 25(2), 338–358. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2015.1090371
Medvés, D. (2012). A környezettudatosság pszichológiai meghatározói. A társas érték, a kognitív korlátok és a társadalmi dilemma. PhD Dissertation. Debreceni Egyetem.
Milfont, T. L. (2009). The Effects of Social Desirability on Self-Reported Environmental Attitudes and Ecological Behaviour. The Environmentalist, 29, 263–269. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-008-9192-2
Milfont, T. L. & Duckitt, J. (2010). The Environmental Attitudes Inventory: A Valid and Reliable Measure to Assess the Structure of Environmental Attitudes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(1), 80–94. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.09.001
Mónus, F., Béres, T. & Sipos, F. (2022). Egyetemi hallgatók környezettudatossága a materializmus, az élettel való elégedettség, a politikai, illetve a pandémiával kapcsolatos nézeteik függvényében. Metszetek, 11(1), 70–97. Online: https://doi.org/10.18392/metsz/2022/1/5
Naár, A. (2022). A magyar háztartások villamosenergia-fogyasztási magatartásmintázatainak feltárása a fenntarthatóság kontextusában. PhD Dissertation. Magyar Agrár- és Élettudományi Egyetem.
Papp-Váry, Á. & Zahorecz, B. (2017). A származási hely (made-in) marketingkommunikációs stratégiái – és miként élhetnek velük a magyar márkák? In R. Richárd & T. Czeglédy (Eds.), Geopolitikai stratégiák Közép-Európában tanulmánykötet (pp. 459–472). Soproni Egyetem Kiadó.
Petty, R. E. & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and Persuasion. Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change. Springer.
Poortinga, W., Steg, L. & Vlek, C. (2008). Values, Environmental Concern, and Environmental Behavior: A Study into Household Energy Use. Environment and Behavior, 36(1), 70–93. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916503251466
Poortinga, W., Whitmarsh, L. & Suffolk, C. (2013). The Introduction of a Single-Use Carrier Bag Charge in Wales: Attitude Change and Behavioural Spillover Effects. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 36, 240–247. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.09.001
Raghubir, P. & Menon, G. (2005). When and Why Is Ease of Retrieval Informative? Memory & Cognition, 33(4), 821–832. Online: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193077
Reber, R., Schwarz, N. & Winkielman, P. (2004). Processing Fluency and Aesthetic Pleasure: Is Beauty in the Perceiver’s Processing Experience? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(4), 364–382. Online: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_3
Reich, J. W. & Robertson, J. L. (1979). Reactance and Norm Appeal in Anti‑Littering Messages. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 9(1), 91–101. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1979.tb00796.x
Schäfferné, D. K. (2007). Az energiatakarékosság környezetvédelmi szempontú megközelítése a hétvégi házak fűtési rendszereiben. Környezetvédelmi és Területfejlesztési Szemle, 14(1), 81–92.
Schneider, M. & Medgyesi, M. (2020). Környezettel és környezetvédelemmel kapcsolatos lakossági attitűdök változása Magyarországon. In T. Kolosi, I. Szelényi & I. Tóth (Eds.), Társadalmi Riport 2020 (pp. 375–396). TÁRKI.
Schultz, P. W. (2002). Knowledge, Education, and Household Recycling: Examining the Knowledge-Deficit Model of Behavior Change. In T. Dietz & P. Stern (Eds.), New Tools for Environmental Protection. Education, Information, and Voluntary Measures (pp. 67–82). National Academy Press.
Staats, H. J., Wit, A. P. & Midden, C. J. H. (1996). Communicating the Greenhouse Effect to the Public: Evaluation of a Mass Media Campaign from a Social Dilemma Perspective. Journal of Environmental Management, 46(2), 189–203. Online: https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.1996.0015
Stanley, L. R. & Lasonde, K. M. (1996). The Relationship between Environmental Issue Involvement and Environmentally-Conscious Behavior: An Exploratory Study. Advances in Consumer Research, 23(1), 183–188.
Sutton, S. G. & Gyuris, E. (2015). Optimizing the Environmental Attitudes Inventory: Establishing a Baseline of Change in Students’ Environmental Attitudes. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 16(1), 16–33. Online: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-03-2013-0027
T. Nagy-Pető, D., Szakály, Z. & Kiss, V. Á. (2023). A helyi termékekkel kapcsolatos fogyasztói elvárások összehasonlító vizsgálata. Marketing & Menedzsment, 57(1), 49–57. Online: https://doi.org/10.15170/MM.2023.57.01.05
Thaler, R. H. & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge. Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness. Yale University Press.
Truelove, H. B., Carrico, A. R., Weber, E. U., Raimi, K. T. & Vandenbergh, M. P. (2014). Positive and Negative Spillover of Pro-Environmental Behavior: An Integrative Review and Theoretical Framework. Global Environmental Change, 29, 127–138. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.09.004
Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131. Online: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
Van der Werff, E., Steg, L. & Keizer, K. (2013). The Value of Environmental Self-Identity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 34, 55–63. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.12.006
Van Liere, K. D. & Dunlap, R. E. (1980). The Social Bases of Environmental Concern: A Review of Hypotheses, Explanations, and Empirical Evidence. Public Opinion Quarterly, 44(2), 181–197. Online: https://doi.org/10.1086/268583
Van Vugt, M. (2001). Community Identification Moderating the Impact of Financial Incentives in a Natural Social Dilemma: Water Conservation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(11), 1440–1449. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672012711005
Varga, A., Ágoston, Cs., Buvár, Á., Szabó, Á. Z. & Dúll, A. (2024). Környezetvédő cselekedetek és ezek gátló tényezői a magyar felnőtt lakosság körében. Észak-magyarországi Stratégiai Füzetek, 21(1), 27–35. Online: https://doi.org/10.32976/stratfuz.2024.3
Webster, D. M. & Kruglanski, A. W. (1994). Individual Differences in Need for Cognitive Closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(6), 1049–1062. Online: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.1049
Wiseman, M. & Bogner, F. X. (2003). A Higher-Order Model of Ecological Values and Its Relationship to Personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 34(5), 783–794. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00071-5
Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal Effects of Mere Exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(2), 1–27. Online: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025848"
["copyrightYear"]=>
int(2025)
["issueId"]=>
int(639)
["licenseUrl"]=>
string(43) "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0"
["pub-id::doi"]=>
string(19) "10.17646/KOME.of.31"
["abstract"]=>
array(1) {
["en_US"]=>
string(1473) "
PDF
Empirical research suggests that labelling individuals as environmentally conscious based on their past behaviours can strengthen their attitudes to the environment and promote further eco-friendly actions, resulting in positive spillover effects. This study aims to test the effectiveness of environmental labelling as a communication tool for energy conservation and domestic product consumption. The online survey of 668 Hungarian participants used an experimental design. Although the effects were weak, even brief exposure to labelling messages resulted in statistically significant changes in environmental attitudes, while no significant effect was found on behavioural intentions. We hypothesise that repeated exposure to similar messages could reinforce attitudes and result in behavioural change. Additionally, the study sought to identify social groups that may serve as target audiences for environmental labelling related to domestic product preferences. Cluster analysis suggests that individuals with conservative views and a preference for right-wing political parties may be particularly responsive to this communication tool. We must add that the non-probabilistic snowball sampling method and the resulting overrepresentation of young, urban and liberal individuals limits the generalisability of the findings for the broader Hungarian population, so further research based on nationally representative samples is needed to validate these results.
" } ["copyrightHolder"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(33) "Balázs Tamás Fekete, Sass Judit" } ["subtitle"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(73) " Investigating Environmental Labelling as a Communication Tool in Hungary" } ["title"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(11) "Green Label" } ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["authors"]=> array(2) { [0]=> object(Author)#1139 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(15) { ["id"]=> int(10017) ["email"]=> string(20) "balazs.fek@gmail.com" ["includeInBrowse"]=> bool(true) ["publicationId"]=> int(7917) ["seq"]=> int(0) ["userGroupId"]=> int(339) ["country"]=> string(2) "HU" ["orcid"]=> string(37) "https://orcid.org/0009-0007-2794-1299" ["url"]=> string(0) "" ["affiliation"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(31) "Corvinus University of Budapest" ["hu_HU"]=> string(57) "a:1:{s:5:"en_US";s:31:"Corvinus University of Budapest";}" } ["biography"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" } ["familyName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(6) "Fekete" ["hu_HU"]=> string(6) "Fekete" } ["givenName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(14) "Balázs Tamás" ["hu_HU"]=> string(14) "Balázs Tamás" } ["preferredPublicName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(21) "Balázs Tamás Fekete" } ["submissionLocale"]=> string(5) "en_US" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } [1]=> object(Author)#1154 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(15) { ["id"]=> int(10018) ["email"]=> string(39) "sass.judit.gabriella@mftk.uni-pannon.hu" ["includeInBrowse"]=> bool(true) ["publicationId"]=> int(7917) ["seq"]=> int(0) ["userGroupId"]=> int(339) ["country"]=> string(2) "HU" ["orcid"]=> string(0) "" ["url"]=> string(0) "" ["affiliation"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(22) "University of Pannonia" } ["biography"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" } ["familyName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(4) "Sass" } ["givenName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(6) "Judit " } ["preferredPublicName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(10) "Judit Sass" } ["submissionLocale"]=> string(5) "en_US" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } ["keywords"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> array(6) { [0]=> string(27) "pro-environmental behaviour" [1]=> string(23) "environmental attitudes" [2]=> string(23) "environmental labelling" [3]=> string(16) "social labelling" [4]=> string(19) "energy conservation" [5]=> string(28) "domestic product consumption" } } ["subjects"]=> array(0) { } ["disciplines"]=> array(0) { } ["languages"]=> array(0) { } ["supportingAgencies"]=> array(0) { } ["galleys"]=> array(1) { [0]=> object(ArticleGalley)#1156 (7) { ["_submissionFile"]=> NULL ["_data"]=> array(9) { ["submissionFileId"]=> int(41893) ["id"]=> int(6513) ["isApproved"]=> bool(false) ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["label"]=> string(3) "PDF" ["publicationId"]=> int(7917) ["seq"]=> int(0) ["urlPath"]=> string(0) "" ["urlRemote"]=> string(0) "" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(true) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) }Current Issue
13. Volume, 1. Number
| 2025
Published: 2025-06-06
ISSN 2063-7330 (online)