object(Publication)#1186 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(28) { ["id"]=> int(7445) ["accessStatus"]=> int(0) ["lastModified"]=> string(19) "2025-06-17 14:39:46" ["primaryContactId"]=> int(9335) ["sectionId"]=> int(133) ["seq"]=> int(0) ["submissionId"]=> int(7321) ["status"]=> int(5) ["version"]=> int(1) ["categoryIds"]=> array(0) { } ["citationsRaw"]=> string(31928) "Alarabiat, A., Soares, D. S. & Estevez, E. (2016). Electronic Participation with a Special Reference to Social Media – A Literature Review. Electronic Participation: 8th IFIP WG 8.5 International Conference, EPart 2016, Guimarães, Portugal, September 5–8. Proceedings, 41–52. Alnemr, N. (2020). Emancipation Cannot Be Programmed: Blind Spots of Algorithmic Facilitation in Online Deliberation. Contemporary Politics, 26(5), 531–552. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2020.1791306 Altheide, D. L. (2020). Media Logic and Media Psychology. In J. van den Bulck (Ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Media Psychology (pp. 1–15). Wiley. Bächtiger, A. & Gerber, M. (2014). Gentlemanly Conversation or Vigorous Contestation? An Exploratory Analysis of Communication Modes in a Transnational Deliberative Poll (Europolis). In K. Grönlund, A. Bächtiger & M. Setälä (Eds.), Deliberative Mini-Publics: Involving Citizens in the Democratic Process (pp. 115–134). ECPR Press. Baek, Y. M., Wojcieszak, M. & Delli Carpini, M. X. (2012). Online Versus Face-to-Face Deliberation: Who? Why? What? With What Effects? New Media & Society, 14(3), 363–383. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444811413191 Baekgaard, M., Christensen, J., Madsen, J. K. & Mikkelsen, K.S. (2020). Rallying Around the Flag in Times of COVID-19: Societal Lockdown and Trust in Democratic Institutions. Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, 3(2). Online: https://doi.org/10.30636/jbpa.32.172 Bakshy, E., Messing, S. & Adamic, L. A. (2015). Exposure to Ideologically Diverse News and Opinion on Facebook. Science, 348(6239), 1130–1132. Online: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa1160 Barbera, P. (2014). How Social Media Reduces Mass Political Polarization: Evidence from Germany, Spain, and the United States. Working Paper. Bargain, O. & Aminjonov, U. (2020). Trust and Compliance to Public Health Policies in Times of COVID-19. IZA Discussion Papers No. 13205. Bertot, J., Jaeger, P. & Grimes, J. (2010). Using ICTs to Create a Culture of Transparency: e-Government and Social Media as Openness and Anti-Corruption Tools for Societies. Government Information Quarterly, 27(3), 264–271. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.03.001 Bode, L. (2016). Pruning the News Feed: Unfriending and Unfollowing Political Content on Social Media. Research & Politics, 3(3). Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168016661873 Bodrunova, S. S. (2018). Cross-Cultural Sentiment Analysis of User Texts on Twitter. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta, 10(6), 191–212. Online: https://doi.org/10.30547/vestnik.journ.6.2018.191212 Bodrunova, S. S. (2021). Russia: A Glass Wall. In Political Communication and COVID-19 (pp. 188–200). Routledge. Bodrunova, S. S. (2023). Cumulative Deliberation: New Normativity in Studying Public Spheres Online. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta, 10(1), 87–122. Online: https://doi.org/10.30547/vestnik.journ.1.2023.87122 Bodrunova, S. S., Blekanov, I. S. & Maksimov, A. (2021a). Public Opinion Dynamics in Online Discussions: Cumulative Commenting and Micro-level Spirals of Silence. In G. Meiselwitz (Ed.), Social Computing and Social Media: Experience Design and Social Network Analysis. HCII 2021 (pp. 205–220). Springer. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77626-8_14 Bodrunova, S. S., Litvinenko, A., Blekanov, N. & Ivan, N. (2021b). Incivility and Political Dissent: Multiple Roles of Aggressive Speech in Comments on Russian YouTube. Proceedings of the Weizenbaum Conference 2021 Democracy in Flux (pp. 44–77). Weizenbaum Institute. Bohman, J. (2006). Deliberative Democracy and the Epistemic Benefits of Diversity. Episteme, 3(3), 175–191. Online: https://doi.org/10.3366/epi.2006.3.3.175 Bohman, J. & Rehg, W. Eds. (1997). Deliberative Democracy. The MIT Press. Boin, A., ‘t Hart, P. & Kuipers, S. (2018). The Crisis Approach In H. Rodriguez, E. Quarantelli & R. Dynes (Eds.), Handbook of Disaster Research (pp. 23–38). New York: Springer. Bol, D., Giani, M., Blais, A. & Loewen, P. J. (2020). The Effect of COVID-19 Lockdowns on Political Support: Some Good News for Democracy? European Journal of Political Research, 60(2), 497–505. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12401 Boyd-MacMillan, E. M., Campbell, C. & Furey, A. (2016). An IC Intervention for Post-Conflict Northern Ireland Secondary Schools. Journal of Strategic Security, 9(4), 111–124. Online: http://dx.doi.org/10.5038/1944-0472.9.4.1558 Bridgman, A., Merkley, E., Zhilin, O., Loewen, P. J., Owen, T. & Ruths, D. (2021). Infodemic Pathways: Evaluating the Role That Traditional and Social Media Play in Cross-National Information Transfer. Frontiers in Political Science, 3. Online: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2021.648646 Brundidge, J. (2010). Encountering “Difference” in the Contemporary Public Sphere: The Contribution of the Internet to the Heterogeneity of Political Discussion Networks. Journal of Communication, 60(4), 680–700. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01509.x Buchanan C. M., Harriger, K. J., McMillan, J. J. & Gusler, S. (2022). Deliberation, Cognitive Complexity, and Political Engagement: A Longitudinal Study of the Impact of Deliberative Training During Emerging Adulthood. Journal of Deliberative Democracy, 18(1). Online: https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.959 Campbell, D. (2013). Social Networks and Political Participation. Annual Review of Political Science, 16, 33–48. Online: https://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-033011-201728 Carcasson, M., Black, L. W. & Sink, E. S. (2010). Communication Studies and Deliberative Democracy: Current Contributions and Future Possibilities. Journal of Public Deliberation, 6(1), 1–42. Online: https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.96 Chambers, S. (1996). Reasonable Democracy. Cornell University Press. Chugunov, A., Filatova, O. & Misnikov, Y. (2016). Citizens’ Deliberation Online as Will-Formation: The Impact of Media Identity on Policy Discourse Outcomes in Russia. In E. Tambouris, et al. Electronic Participation. ePart 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol. 9821 (pp. 67–82). Springer. Cohen, J. (1997). Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy. In J. Bohman & W. Rehg. (Eds.), Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics (p. 67). The MIT Press. Colombo, C. (2018). Hearing the Other Side? Debiasing Political Opinions in the Case of the Scottish Independence Referendum. Political Studies, 66(1), 23–42. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321717723486 Cristea, F. et al. (2022). A Comparative Analysis of Experienced Uncertainties in Relation to Risk Communication During COVID-19: A Four-Country Study. Global Health, 18(1). Online: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-022-00857-x Davies, B., Lalot, F., Peitz, L., Heering, M., Ozkececi, H., Babaian, J., Hayon, K. D., Broadwood, J. & Abrams, D. (2021). Changes in Political Trust in Britain During the COVID-19 Pandemic in 2020: Integrated Public Opinion Evidence and Implications. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8(1), 1–9. Online: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00850-6 Delli Carpini, M., Cook, F. & Jacobs, L. (2004). Public Deliberation, Discursive Partiсipation, and Citizen Engagement. A Review of Empirical Literature. Annual Review of Political Science, 7, 315–344. Online: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.7.121003.091630 Del Valle, M. E., Sijtsma, R., Stegeman, H. & Borge, R. (2020). Online Deliberation and the Public Sphere: Developing a Coding Manual to Assess Deliberation in Twitter Political Networks. Javnost – The Public, 27(3), 211–229. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2020.1794408 Devine, D., Gaskell, J., Jennings, W. & Stoker, G. (2021). Trust and the Coronavirus Pandemic: What Are the Consequences of and for Trust? An Early Review of the Literature. Political Studies Review, 19(2), 274–285. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/1478929920948684 Dryzek, J. (2000). Deliberative Democracy and Beyond. Liberals, Critics, Contestations. Oxford University Press. Dryzek, J. S. (2009). Democratization as Deliberative Capacity Building. Comparative Political Studies, 42(11), 1379–1402. Dryzek, J. S., Bachtiger, A., Chambers, S., Cohen, J., Druckman, J. N., Felicetti, A., et al. (2019). The Crisis of Democracy and the Science of Deliberation. Science, 363(6432), 1144–1146. Online: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaw2694 Dryzek, J. S. & Niemeyer, S. (2006). Reconciling Pluralism and Consensus as Political Ideals. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 634–649. Dubois, E. & Szwarc, J. (2018). Self-Censorship, Polarization, and the “Spiral of Silence” on Social Media [Conference session]. Policy & Politics Conference, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. Easton, D. (1975). A re-Assessment of the Concept of Political Support. British Journal of Political Science, 5(4), 435–457. Enikeeva, E. M., Kulnazarova, A. V., Rafikov, A. I. & Shutman, D. V. (2023). The Impact of Digital Tools on Conflictive Communications in the “Government-Society System”: St. Petersburg Experience. Communication Strategies in Digital Society Seminar (ComSDS), Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation, 147–150. Esau, K., Fleu, D. & Nienhaus, S. (2020). Different Arenas, Different Deliberative Quality? Using a Systemic Framework to Evaluate Online Deliberation on Immigration Policy in Germany. Policy & Internet, 13(1), 86–112. Online: https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.232 Esau, K., Friess, D. & Eilders, C. (2017). Design Matters! An Empirical Analysis of Online Deliberation on Different News Platforms. Policy & Internet, 9(3), 321–342. Online: https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.154 Esterling, K. M., Fung, A. & Lee, T. (2015). How Much Disagreement Is Good for Democratic Deliberation? Political Communication, 32(4), 529–551. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2014.969466 Eveland, W. P. (2004). The Effect of Political Discussion in Producing Informed Citizens: The Roles of Information, Motivation, and Elaboration. Political Communication, 21(2), 177– 193. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600490443877 Eveland, W. P. & Hively, M. H. (2009). Political Discussion Frequency, Network Size, and “Heterogeneity” of Discussion as Predictors of Political Knowledge and Participation. Journal of Communication, 59(2), 205–224. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01412.x Filatova, O. G. & Chugunov, A. V. (2022). Development of e-Participation Ecosystem in Russia in the Early 2020s: The Role of Social Media and Regional Control Centers. Political Expertise: POLITEX, 18(2), 120–137. Online: http://dx.doi.org/10.21638/spbu23.2022.201 Filatova, O. & Volkovskii, D. (2020). The Online Discourse as a Form of e-Participation: The Experience of Internet Discourse Research. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (ICEGOV 2020). Athens, Greece, 326–333. Online: https://doi.org/10.1145/3428502.3428547 Filatova, O. & Volkovskii, D. (2021). Online Deliberation on Social Media as a Form of Public Dialogue in Russia. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 3090, 146–156. Online: https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3090/paper13.pdf Fischer, K., Reedy, J., Piercy, C. & Thalpaliya, R. (2022). A Typology of Reasoning in Deliberative Processes: A Study of the 2010 Oregon Citizens’ Initiative Review. Journal of Deliberative Democracy, 18(2). Online: https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.951 Fishkin, J. (1995). The Voice of the People. Yale University Press. Fournier-Tombs, E. & Di Marzo Serugendo, G. (2020). DelibAnalysis: Understanding the Quality of Online Political Discourse with Machine Learning. Journal of Information Science, 46(6), 810–922. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551519871828 Friess, D. & Eilders, C. (2015). A Systematic Review of Online Deliberation Research. Policy Internet, 7(3), 319–339. Online: https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.95 Gastil, J. (1993). Democracy in Small Groups: Participation, Decision Making, and Communication. New Society. Gastil, J. (2000). By Popular Demand. University of California Press. Gastil, J. (2008). Political Communication and Deliberation. Sage. Gastil, J. (2018). The Lessons and Limitations of Experiments in Democratic Deliberation. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 14(1), 271–291. Online: https://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110316-113639 Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2015). New Technologies and Civic Engagement: New Agendas in Communication. Routledge. Goodwin, M. (1983). Aggravated Correction and Disagreement in Children’s Conversations. Journal of Pragmatics, 7(6), 657–677. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(83)90089-9 Gonçalves, F. M. & Baranauskas, C. (2023). Designing in Pandemic Context: Scientific Collaboration through the Open Design Platform. Interacting with Computers, 35(2), 105–117. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwac030 Goyanes, M., Borah, P. & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2021). Social Media Filtering and Democracy: Effects of Social Media News Use and Uncivil Political Discussions on Social Media Unfriending. Computers in Human Behavior, 120. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106759 Grönlund, K., Herne, K., Strandberg, K. & Söderlund, P. (2023). Disagreement and Deliberation: Evidence from Three Deliberative Mini-Publics. Political Behavior, 45, 831–853. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-021-09733-7 Grönlund, K., Setälä, M. & Herne K. (2010). Deliberation and Civic Virtues: Lessons from a Citizen Deliberation Experiment. European Political Science Review, 2(1), 95–117. Online: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773909990245 Gutmann, A. & Thompson, D. (1996). Democracy and Disagreement. Harvard University Press. Habermas, J. (1996). Between Facts and Norms. Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. MIT Press. Halpern, D. & Gibbs, J. (2013). Social Media as a Catalyst for Online Deliberation? Exploring the Affordances of Facebook and YouTube for Political Expression. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 1159–1168. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.10.008 Haro-de-Rosario, A., Sáez-Martín, A. & del Carmen Caba-Pérez, M. (2018). Using Social Media to Enhance Citizen Engagement with Local Government: Twitter or Facebook? New Media & Society, 20(1), 29–49. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816645652 He, B. (2006). Western Theories of Deliberative Democracy and the Chinese Practice of Complex Deliberative Governance. In E. Leib & B. He (Eds.), The Search for Deliberation Democracy in China (pp. 133–148). Palgrave MacMillan. Hong, Y. & Rojas, H. (2016). Agreeing Not to Disagree: Iterative versus Episodic Forms of Political Participatory Behaviors. International Journal of Communication, 10, 1743–1763. Hyun, K. D. (2018). The Role of Political Agreement and Disagreement of News and Political Discussion on Social Media for Political Participation. Analyses & Alternatives, 2(2), 31–66. Online: https://koreascience.kr/article/JAKO201812263806307.pdf Huckfeldt, R., Johnson, P. E. & Sprague, J. (2004a). Political Disagreement: The Survival of Diverse Opinions within Communication Networks. Cambridge University Press. Huckfeldt, R., Mendez, J. M. & Osborn, T. (2004b). Disagreement, Ambivalence, and Engagement: The Political Consequences of Heterogeneous Networks. Political Psychology, 25(1), 65–95. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00357.x Innes, J. E. & Booher, D. E. (2003). Collaborative Policymaking: Governance through Dialogue. In M. a. Hajer & H. Wagenaar (Eds.), Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society (pp. 33–59). Cambridge University Press. Jørgensen, F., Bor, A. & Petersen, M. B. (2021). Compliance Without Fear: Individual-Level Protective Behavior During the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic. British Journal of Health Psychology, 26(2), 679–696. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12519 Kachanoff, F. J., Bigman, Y. E., Kapsaskis, K. & Gray, K. (2021). Measuring Realistic and Symbolic Threats of COVID-19 and Their Unique Impacts on Well-Being and Adherence to Public Health Behaviors. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12(5), 603–616. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620931634 Kim, Y., Hsu, S.-H. & Gil de Zúniga, H. (2013). Influence of Social Media Use on Discussion Network Heterogeneity and Civic Engagement: The Moderating Role of Personality Traits. Journal of Communication, 63(3), 498–516. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12034 Klofstad, C. A., Sokhey, A. E. & McClurg, S. D. (2013). Disagreeing about Disagreement: How Conflict in Social Networks Affects Political Behavior. American Journal of Political Science, 57(1), 120–134. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2012.00620.x Kuyper, J. W. (2018). The Instrumental Value of Deliberative Democracy – Or, Do We Have Good Reasons to Be Deliberative Democrats? Journal of Public Deliberation, 14(1). Online: https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.291 Laden, A. S. (2012). Reasoning: A Social Picture. Oxford University Press. Lee, F. L. (2012). Does Discussion with Disagreement Discourage All Types of Political Participation? Survey Evidence from Hong Kong. Communication Research, 39(4), 543–562. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650211398356 Lee, H., Kwak, N. & Campbell, S. W. (2015). Hearing the Other Side Revisited: The Joint Workings of Cross-Cutting Discussion and Strong Tie Homogeneity in Facilitating Deliberative and Participatory Democracy. Communication Research, 42(4), 569–596. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650213483824 Lilleker, D., Coman, I. A., Gregor, M. & Novelli, E. (2021). Political Communication and COVID-19: Governance and Rhetoric in Global Comparative Perspective. In Political Communication and COVID-19: Governance and Rhetoric in Times of Crisis (pp. 333–350). Routledge. Liu, B. F., Bartz, L. & Duke, N. (2016). Communicating Crisis Uncertainty: A Review of the Knowledge Gaps. Public Relations Review, 42(3), 479–487. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2016.03.003 Lu, Y., Heatherly, K. A. & Lee, J. K. (2016). Cross-Cutting Exposure on Social Networking Sites: The Effects of SNS Discussion Disagreement on Political Participation. Computers in Human Behavior, 59, 74–81. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.01.030 Maia, R. C., Hauber, G., Choucair, T. & Crepalde, N. J. (2021). What Kind of Disagreement Favors Reason-Giving? Analyzing Online Political Discussions across the Broader Public Sphere. Political Studies, 69(1), 108–128. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321719894708 Maia, R. C. M. & Rezende, T. A. S. (2016). Respect and Disrespect in Deliberation across the Networked Media Environment: Examining Multiple Paths of Political Talk. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 21(2), 121–139. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12155 Mansbridge, J., Bohman, J., Chambers, S., Christiano, T., Fung, A., Parkinson, J., Thompson, D. F. & Warren, M. E. (2012). A Systemic Approach to Deliberative Democracy. In J. Parkinson & J. Mansbridge (Eds.), Deliberative Systems (pp. 1–26). Cambridge University Press. Marien, S. & Hooghe, M. (2021). Does Political Trust Matter? An Empirical Investigation into the Relation Between Political Trust and Support for law Compliance. European Journal of Political Research, 50(2), 267–291. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2010.01930.x Masullo Chen, G., Muddiman, A., Wilner, T., Pariser, E. & Stroud, N. J. (2019) We Should Not Get Rid of Incivility Online. Social Media + Society, 5(3). Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119862641 McClurg, S. D. (2006a). The Electoral Relevance of Political Talk: Examining Disagreement and Expertise Effects in Social Networks on Political Participation. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 737–754. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00213.x McClurg, S. D. (2006b). Political Disagreement in Context: The Conditional Effect of Neighborhood Context, Disagreement, and Political Talk on Electoral Participation. Political Behavior, 28, 349–366. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-006-9015-4 McLeod, J. M. & Lee, N. J. (2012). Social Networks, Public Discussion and Civic Engagement: A Socialization Perspective. In H. A. Semetko & M. Scammell (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Political Communication (pp. 197–208). Sage. Melville, A., Yu., Malgin, A.V., Mironyuk, M. G. & Stukal, D. K. (2023). “Political Atlas of the Modern World 2.0”: Formulation of the Research Problem. Polis. Political Studies, 2, 72–87. Online: https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2023.02.06 Moy, P. & Gastil, J. (2006). Predicting Deliberative Conversation: The Impact of Discussion Networks, Media Use, and Political Cognitions. Political Communication, 23(4), 443–460. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600600977003 Mutz, D. C. (2002a). Cross-Cutting Social Networks: Testing Democratic Theory in Practice. American Political Science Review, 96(1), 111–126. Mutz, D. C. (2002b). The Consequences of Cross-Cutting Networks for Political Participation. American Journal of Political Science, 46(4), 838–855. Mutz, D. C. (2006). Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative versus Participatory Democracy. Cambridge University Press. Nikolov, D., Oliveira, D. F. M., Flammini, A. & Menczer, F. (2015). Measuring Online Social Bubbles. Peer Computer Science, 1, e38. Online: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.38 Nir, L. (2005). Ambivalent Social Networks and Their Consequences for Participation. International Journal for Public Opinion Research, 17(4), 422–442. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edh069 Nizomutdinov, B. A. & Filatova, O. G. (2023). Testing Methods for Processing Comments from Telegram Channels and Public VKontakte to Analyze the Social Media. International Journal of Open Information Technologies, 11(5), 137–145. Page, B. I. (1996). Who Deliberates? Mass Media in Modern Democracy. University of Chicago Press. Pattie, C. J. & Johnston, R. J. (2009). Conversation, Disagreement and Political Participation. Political Behavior, 31(2), 261–285. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-008-9071-z Picazo-Vela, S., Gutiérrez-Martínez, I. & Luna-Reyes, L. F. (2012). Understanding Risks, Benefits, and Strategic Alternatives of Social Media Applications in the Public Sector. Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), 504–511. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.07.002 Pradel, F., Zilinsky, J., Kosmidis, S. & Theocharis, Y. (2024). Toxic Speech and Limited Demand for Content Moderation on Social Media. American Political Science Review, 118(4), 1895–1912. Online: https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305542300134X Price, V., Nir, L. & Capella, J. N. (2002). Does Disagreement Contribute to More Deliberative Opinion? Political Communication, 19(1), 95–112. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/105846002317246506 Price, V., Nir, L. & Capella, J. N. (2006). Normative and Informational Influences in Online Political Discussions. Communication Theory, 16(1), 47–74. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00005.x Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Simon & Shuster. Raude, J., Lecrique J-M., Lasbeur, L., Leon, C., Guignard, R., du Roscoät, E. & Arwidson, P. (2020). Determinants of Preventive Behaviors in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic in France: Comparing the Sociocultural, Psychosocial, and Social Cognitive Explanations. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. Online: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.584500 Rojas, H. (2008). Strategy Versus Understanding: How Orientations toward Political Conversation Influence Political Engagement. Communication Research, 35(4), 452–480. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650208315977 Rossini, P. & Maia, R. (2021). Characterizing Disagreement in Online Political Talk: Examining Incivility and Opinion Expression on News Websites and Facebook in Brazil. Journal of Deliberative Democracy, 17(1), 90–104. Online: https://doi.org/10.16997/10.16997/jdd.967 Savin, N. (2019). Does Media Matter? Variation of VK and Facebook Deliberative Capacities (evidence from Discussions on the Crimea Crisis). Communications. Media. Design, 4(3), 119–139. Scheufele, D. A., Nisbet, M. C., Brossard, D. & Nisbet, E. C. (2004). Social Structure and Citizenship: Examining the Impacts of Social Setting, Network Heterogeneity and Informational Variables on Political Participation. Political Communication, 21(3), 315–338. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600490481389 Schraff, D. (2020). Political Trust During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Rally around the Flag or Lockdown Effects? European Journal of Political Research, 60, 1007–1017. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12425 Shin, B. & Rask, M. (2021). Assessment of Online Deliberative Quality: New Indicators Using Network Analysis and Time-Series Analysis. Sustainability, 13(3). Online: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031187 Sibley, C.G., et al. (2020). Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Nationwide Lockdown on Trust, Attitudes Toward Government, and Well-Being. American Psychologist, 75(5), 618–630. Online: https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000662 Steffensmeier, T. & Schenk-Hamlin, W. (2008). Argument Quality in Public Deliberations. Argumentation and Advocacy, 45(1), 21–36. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/00028533.2008.11821693 Strandberg, K. & Grönlund, K. (2018). Online Deliberation: – An Overview of the Central Aspects of a Growing Research Field. In A. Bächtiger, J. S. Dryzek, J. Mansbridge & M. E. Warren (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy (pp. 365–377). Oxford University Press. Strickler, R. (2018). Deliberate with the Enemy? Polarization, Social Identity, and Attitudes toward Disagreement. Political Research Quarterly, 71(1), 3–18. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912917721371 Stromer-Galley, J. (2007). Measuring Deliberation’s Content: A Coding Scheme. Journal of Public Deliberation, 3(1). Online: https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.50 Stromer-Galley, J., Bryant, L. & Bimber, B. (2015). Context and Medium Matter: Expressing Disagreements Online and Face-to-Face in Political Deliberations. Journal of Public Deliberation, 11(1). Online: https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.218 Stromer-Galley, J. & Muhlberger, P. (2009). Agreement and Disagreement in Group Deliberation: Effects on Deliberation Satisfaction, Future Engagement, and Decision Legitimacy. Political Communication, 26(2), 173–192. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600902850775 Stukal, D., Sanovich, S., Bonneau, R. & Tucker, J. A. (2017). Detecting Bots on Russian Political Twitter. Big Data, 5(4), 310–324. Online: https://doi.org/10.1089/big.2017.0038 Stukal, D., Sanovich, S., Tucker, J. A. & Bonneau, R. (2019). For Whom the Bot Tolls: A Neural Networks Approach to Measuring Political Orientation of Twitter Bots in Russia. Sage Open, 9(2). Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019827715 Sunstein, C. R. (2001). Republic.Com. Princeton University Press. Sunstein, C. R. (2017). #Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media. Princeton University Press. Taylor, S. (2019). The Psychology of Pandemics: Preparing for the Next Global Outbreak of Infectious Disease. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publications. Theocharis, Y., Barberá, P., Fazekas, Z. & Popa, S. A. (2020). The Dynamics of Political Incivility on Twitter. Sage Open, 10(2). Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020919447 Torfing, J., Sørensen, E. & Røiseland, A. (2019). Transforming the Public Sector into an Arena for Co-Creation: Barriers, Drivers, Benefits, and Ways Forward. Administration & Society, 51(5), 795–825. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399716680057 Volkovskii, D. & Filatova, O. (2022a). Agreement and Disagreement in American Social Media Discussions (Evidence from Facebook Discussions on the Second Impeachment of D. Trump). In L. Amaral, D. Soares & L. Zheng (Eds.), ICEGOV 2022: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (pp. 221–228). Association for Computing Machinery. Volkovskii, D., Filatova, O. (2022b). Influence of Media Type on Political E-Discourse: Analysis of Russian and American Discussions on Social Media. In A. V. Chugunov, M. Janssen, I. Khodachek, Y. Misnikov & D. Trutnev (Eds.), Electronic Governance and Open Society. Challenges in Eurasia – 8th International Conference, EGOSE 2021, Proceedings. (pp. 119–131) Springer Nature. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04238-6_10 Volkovskii, D. & Filatova, O. (2023). Low Civility and High Incivility in Russian Online Deliberation: A Case of Political Talk in VKontakte Social Network. KOME, 11(1), 95–109. Online: https://doi.org/10.17646/KOME.2023.1.4 Volkovskii, D., Filatova, O., Bodrunova, S. & Bolgov, R. (2024). Does Government Hear Citizenry? The Quality of Deliberative Practice between Authorities and Citizens on Social Media in Russia. In S. Chun & G. Karuri-Sebina (Eds.), Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (ICEGOV ’24) (pp. 327–336). Association for Computing Machinery. Volkovskii, D., Filatova, O. & Bolgov, R. (2023). Automated Detection of Different Publication Patterns of Online Deliberation as a Research Domain. In A. Coman & S. Vasilache (Eds.), Social Computing and Social Media: 15th International Conference, SCSM 2023, Held as Part of the 25th HCI International Conference, HCII 2023, Copenhagen, Denmark, July 23–28, 2023, Proceedings, Part I (pp. 146–163). Springer Nature. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35915-6_12 Warren, M. E. (2017). A Problem-Based Approach to Democratic Theory. American Political Science Review, 111(1), 39–53. Online: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055416000605 Weeks, B. E., Lane, D. S., Kim, D. H., Lee, S. S. & Kwak, N. (2017). Incidental Exposure, Selective Exposure, and Political Information Sharing: Integrating Online Exposure Patterns and Expression on Social Media. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(6), 363–379. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12199 Wojcieszak, M., Baek, Y. M. & Delli Carpini, M. X. (2009). What is Really Going On? Structure Underlying Face-to-Face and Online Deliberation. Information, Communication & Society, 12(7), 1080–1102. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180902725768 Wojcieszak, M. E. & Mutz, D.C. (2009). Online Groups and Political Discourse: Do Online Discussion Spaces Facilitate Exposure to Political Disagreement? Journal of Communication, 59(1), 40–56. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01403.x Wojcieszak, M. & Price, V. (2010). Bridging the Divide or Intensifying the Conflict? How Disagreement Affects Strong Predilections About Sexual Minorities. Political Psychology, 31(3), 315–339. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2009.00753.x Wojcieszak, M. & Price, V. (2012). Perceived versus Actual Disagreement: Which Influences Deliberative Experiences? Journal of Communication, 62(3), 418–436. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460‑2466.2012.01645.x Yang, J., Barnidge, M. & Rojas, H. (2017). The Politics of “Unfriending”: User Filtration in Response to Political Disagreement on Social Media. Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 22–29. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.079 Yardi, S. & Boyd, D. (2010). Dynamic Debates: An Analysis of Group Polarization over Time on Twitter. Bulletin of Science. Technology & Society, 30(5), 316–327. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467610380011 Zhang, X., Lin, W.-Y. & Dutton, W. H. (2022). The Political Consequences of Online Disagreement: The Filtering of Communication Networks in a Polarized Political Context. Social Media + Society, 8(3). Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221114391 Zinnatullin, A. (2023). Political Discussions in Online Oppositional Communities in the Non-Democratic Context. Computational Communication Research, 5(1). Online: https://doi.org/10.5117/CCR2023.1.7.ZINN " ["copyrightYear"]=> int(2025) ["issueId"]=> int(639) ["licenseUrl"]=> string(43) "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0" ["pub-id::doi"]=> string(19) "10.17646/KOME.of.25" ["abstract"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(1313) "

This article provides an overview of current studies dedicated to agreement and disagreement in online deliberation, and explains the relevance and challenges of exploring political disagreement in the digital sphere. Two dominant approaches to understanding disagreement that have existed since the early 2000s are defined that have provoked an acute scientific debate on the ambiguous impacts of disagreement on deliberative process and the participatory activity of citizens. A literature review outlines three main groups of works on the consequences of disagreement. This article contributes to the field of political communication in several ways. First, the current gaps in studying agreement and disagreement and their impact on political communication are indicated. Second, future Research venues are proposed according to detected lacunas. Third, an explanation is provided of why the issue of disagreement in the field of political communication is so complex to study. Fourth, the methodologies for analysing agreement and disagreement in online deliberation, including computational methods of textanalysis, are highlighted. Based on a methodological review, the parameters for agreement and disagreement analysis in political discussions are summarised and tested through empirical research.

" } ["copyrightHolder"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(17) "Volkovskii Daniil" } ["prefix"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(3) "The" } ["subtitle"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(79) "Current Research Directions and Methods in the Field of Political Communication" } ["title"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(73) "Tricky Bits of Studying Agreement and Disagreement in Online Deliberation" } ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["authors"]=> array(1) { [0]=> object(Author)#1184 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(11) { ["id"]=> int(9335) ["email"]=> string(28) "daniil.volkovskii@yandex.com" ["includeInBrowse"]=> bool(true) ["publicationId"]=> int(7445) ["seq"]=> int(0) ["userGroupId"]=> int(339) ["country"]=> string(2) "FR" ["affiliation"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(27) "a:1:{s:5:"en_US";s:2:"Mr";}" ["hu_HU"]=> string(27) "a:1:{s:5:"en_US";s:2:"Mr";}" } ["familyName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(10) "Volkovskii" ["hu_HU"]=> string(10) "Volkovskii" } ["givenName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(6) "Daniil" ["hu_HU"]=> string(6) "Daniil" } ["submissionLocale"]=> string(5) "en_US" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } ["keywords"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> array(6) { [0]=> string(23) "political communication" [1]=> string(19) "public deliberation" [2]=> string(23) "political participation" [3]=> string(9) "agreement" [4]=> string(12) "disagreement" [5]=> string(12) "social media" } } ["subjects"]=> array(0) { } ["disciplines"]=> array(0) { } ["languages"]=> array(0) { } ["supportingAgencies"]=> array(0) { } ["galleys"]=> array(1) { [0]=> object(ArticleGalley)#1200 (7) { ["_submissionFile"]=> NULL ["_data"]=> array(9) { ["submissionFileId"]=> int(40707) ["id"]=> int(6378) ["isApproved"]=> bool(false) ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["label"]=> string(3) "PDF" ["publicationId"]=> int(7445) ["seq"]=> int(0) ["urlPath"]=> string(0) "" ["urlRemote"]=> string(0) "" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(true) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) }