Low Civility and High Incivility in Russian Online Deliberation
A Case of Political Talk in Vkontakte Social Network
Copyright (c) 2023 Daniil Volkovskii, Olga Filatova
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Abstract
One of the most studied fields in deliberative research is (in)civility in Internet-based political discussions on issues of common concern. Uncivil behaviour demonstrated by participants in online communication has various forms and negative effects on the process and outcomes of e-deliberation as well as on deliberators’ reactions and attitudes, which have been predominantly investigated in Western democracies. However, this issue has been poorly covered in the countries with less stable democratic traditions and values. This paper explores speech culture with a focus on civility and incivility in Russian political conversations conducted on Russian social media. The authors analyse mass-scale web political discussions on a polarising issue of the court sentence of the politician Alexei Navalny (2021), taking one of the most popular Russian social networks VKontakte. For this study, scholars use discourse analysis based on the works on deliberative democracy proposed by J. Habermas (1996). They conclude that Russian political speech regarding Navalny’s sentence and conducted on the VKontakte social media platform can be characterised by a great extent of uncivil speech unbalanced by a low extent of civil speech. The conversations are not oriented towards mutual recognition or reaching a consensus, as participants are often distracted from the main issue being discussed, and turn to interpersonal topics instead.
Keywords:
How to Cite
References
Anderson, A. A., Brossard, D., Scheufele, D. A., Xenos, M. A. & Ladwig, P. (2014). The “Nasty Effect”: Online Incivility and Risk Perceptions of Emerging Technologies. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(3), 373–387. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12009
Badjatiya, P., Gupta, S., Gupta, M. & Varma, V. (2017). Deep Learning for Hate Speech Detection in Tweets. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion. 759–760.
Bilewicz, M. & Soral, W. (2020). Hate Speech Epidemic. The Dynamic Effects of Derogatory Language on Intergroup Relations and Political Radicalization. Political Psychology, 41(S1), 3–33. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12670
Bodrunova, S. & Blekanov, I. (2021). A Self-Critical Public: Cumulation of Opinion on Belarusian Oppositional YouTube before the 2020 Protests. Social Media + Society, 7(1), 1–13. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211063464
Bodrunova, S. S., Litvinenko, A., Blekanov, I. & Nepiyushchikh, D. (2021). Constructive Aggression? Multiple Roles of Aggressive Content in Political Discourse on Russian YouTube. Media and Communication, 9(1), 181–194. Online: https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v9i1.3469
Bodrunova, S. (2021). Social Media and Political Dissent in Russia and Belarus: An Introduction to the Special Issue. Social Media + Society, 7(4), 1–8. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211063470
Bonotti, M. & Zech, S. T. (2021). Recovering Civility during Covid-19. Palgrave Macmillan Singapore. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-6706-7
Boxell, L., Gentzkow, M. & Shapiro, J. (2020). Cross-Country Trends in Affective Polarization. NBER Working Paper, No. w26669.
Castaño-Pulgarín, S. A., Suárez-Betancur, N., Vega, L. M. & López, H. M. (2021). Internet, Social Media and Online Hate Speech. Systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 58. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2021.101608
Chen, G. M. & Lu, S. (2017). Online Political Discourse: Exploring Differences in Effects of Civil and Uncivil Disagreement in News Website Comments. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 61(1), 108–125. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2016.1273922
Choi, S. (2014). Flow, Diversity, Form, and Influence of Political Talk in Social Media-Based Public Forums. Human Communication Research, 40(2), 209–237. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12023
Coe, K., Kenski, K. & Rains, S. A. (2011). Online and Uncivil? Patterns and Determinants of Incivility in Newspaper Website Comments. Journal of Communication, 64(4), 658–679. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12104
Coleman, S. (2018). Can the Internet Strengthen Democracy? European Journal of Communication, 33(4), 461–461. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323118789517a
Critcher, C. (2008). Moral Panic Analysis: Past, Present and Future. Sociology Compass, 2(4), 1127–1144. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2008.00122.x
Davies, T. & Gangadharan, S. P. (2009). Online Deliberation. Design, Research, and Practice. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Druckman, J. N., Gubitz, S. R., Levendusky, M. S. & Lloyd, A. M. (2019). How Incivility on Partisan Media
(De)Polarizes the Electorate. The Journal of Politics, 81(1), 291–295. Online: https://doi.org/10.1086/699912
Ercan, S. A., Asenbaum, H., Curato, N. & Mendonça, R. F. eds. (2022). Research Methods in Deliberative Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Filatova, O., Kabanov, Y. & Misnikov, Y. (2019). Public Deliberation in Russia: Deliberative Quality, Rationality and Interactivity of the Online Media Discussions. Media and Communication, 7(3), 133–144. Online: https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v7i3.1925
Filatova, O. & Volkovskii, D. (2021a). Key Parameters of Internet Discussions: Testing the Methodology of Discourse Analysis. In A. V. Chugunov et al. (eds.): Digital Transformation and Global Society (DTGS 2020). Proceedings of the 5th International Conference, St. Petersburg, Russia. 32–46.
Filatova, O. & Volkovskii, D. (2021b). Online Deliberation on Social Media as a Form of Public Dialogue in Russia. IMS 2021 – International Conference “Internet and Modern Society”, 24–26 June 2021, St. Petersburg, Russia. 146–156.
Filatova, O. & Volkovskii, D. (2020). The Online Discourse as a Form of E-Participation: The Experience of Internet Discourse Research. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (ICEGOV 2020). Athens, Greece. 326–333.
Fitsilis, P. ed. (2022). Building on Smart Cities. Skills and Competences. Human Factors Affecting Smart Cities Development. Cham: Springer. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97818-1
Friess, D. & Eilders, C. A. (2015). A Systematic Review of Online Deliberation Research. Policy & Internet, 7(3), 319–339. Online: https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.95
Gagliardone, I. (2014). Mapping and Analysing Hate Speech Online. Online: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2601792
Gervais, B. T. (2017). More than Mimicry? The Role of Anger in Uncivil Reactions to Elite Political Incivility. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 29(3), 384–405. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edw010
Han, S. & Brazeal, L. (2015). Playing Nice: Modeling Civility in Online Political Discussions. Communication Research Reports, 32(1), 20–28. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2014.989971
Halpern, D. & Gibbs, J. (2013). Social Media as a Catalyst for Online Deliberation? Exploring the Affordances of Facebook and YouTube for Political Expression. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 1159–1168. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.10.008
Hwang, G. J. (2014). Definition, Framework and Research Issues of Smart Learning Environments – A Context-Aware Ubiquitous Learning Perspective. Smart Learning Environment, 1, 4. Online: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-014-0004-5
Jamieson, K. H. & Hardy, B. (2012). What Is Civil Engaged Argument and Why Does Aspiring to It Matter? In D. M. Shea & M. Fiorina (eds.): Can We Talk? The Rise of Rude, Nasty, Stubborn Politics. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Press. 27–40.
Kim, J. W. & Park, S. (2019). How Perceptions of Incivility and Social Endorsement in Online Comments (Dis) Encourage Engagements. Behaviour & Information Technology, 38(3), 217–229. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2018.1523464
Laden, A. S. (2019). Two Concepts of Civility. In R. G. Boatright, T. J. Shaffer, S. Sobieraj & D. G. Young (eds.): A Crisis of Civility. Political Discourse and Its Discontents. New York: Routledge. 9–31. Online: http://doi.org/10.4324/9781351051989
Linde, А. N. (2022). Kontseptsia deliberativnoy democratii J. Habermasa: znachenie dlya teorii democratii i teorii politicheskoy communicacii [J. Habermas’s Concept of Deliberative Democracy: Relevance for Democratic Theory and Political Communication Theory]. Aspect Press.
Loveland, M. T. & Popescu, D. (2011). Democracy on the Web. Information, Communication & Society, 14(5), 684–703. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2010.521844
Mason, L. (2013). The Rise of Uncivil Agreement: Issue Versus Behavioral Polarization in the American Electorate. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(1), 140–159. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764212463363
Masullo, G. M., Lu, S. & Fadnis, D. (2021). Does Online Incivility Cancel out the Spiral of Silence? A Moderated Mediation Model of Willingness to Speak out. New Media & Society, 23(11), 3391–3414. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820954194
McClurg, S. (2006). The Electoral Relevance of Political Talk: Examining Disagreement and Expertise Effects in Social Networks on Political Participation. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 737–754. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00213.x
Miller, M. L. & Vaccari, C. (2020). Digital Threats to Democracy: Comparative Lessons and Possible Remedies. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 25(3), 333–356. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161220922323
Misnikov, Y. (2010). Discursive Qualities of Public Discussion on the Russian Internet: Testing the Habermasian Communicative Action Empirically. From E-Participation to Online Deliberation. In F. De Cindio, A.
Macintosh & C. Peraboni (eds.): Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Online Deliberation, OD2010. Leeds, UK, 30 June – 2 July, 2010. 60–74.
Misnikov, Y. (2012). How to Read and Treat Online Public Discussions among Ordinary Citizens beyond Political Mobilisation: Empirical Evidence from the Russian-Language Online Forums. Digital Icons: Studies in Russian, Eurasian and Central European New Media, 7, 1–37.
Misnikov, Y. (2011). Public Activism Online in Russia: Citizens’ Participation in Web-based Interactive Political Debate in the Context of Civil Society. Development and Transition to Democracy. PhD thesis.
Mutz, D. C. (2006). Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative Versus Participatory Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mutz, D. C. & Reeves, B. (2005). The New Videomalaise: Effects of Televised Incivility on Political Trust. American Political Science Review, 99(1), 1–15. Online: https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305540505145
Ng, E. & Detenber, B. (2005). The Impact of Synchronicity and Civility in Online Political Discussions on Perceptions and Intentions to Participate. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(3). Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00252.x
Ordoñez, M. A. M. & Nekmat, E. (2019). “Tipping Point” in the SoS? Minority-supportive Opinion Climate Proportion and Perceived Hostility in Uncivil Online Discussion. New Media & Society, 21(11–12), 2483–2504. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819851056
Papacharissi, Z. (2004). Democracy Online: Civility, Politeness, and the Democratic Potential of Online Political Discussion Groups. New Media & Society, 6(2), 259–283. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444804041444
Reiheld, A. (2013). Asking too Much? Civility vs. Pluralism. Philosophical Topics, 41(2), 59–78. Online: http://doi.org/10.5840/philtopics201341215
Rood, C. (2014). ‘Moves’ toward Rhetorical Civility. Pedagogy, 14(3), 395–415. Online: http://doi.org/10.1215/15314200-2715778
Rösner, L. & Krämer, N. C. (2016). Verbal Venting in the Social Web: Effects of Anonymity and Group Norms on Aggressive Language Use in Online Comments. Social Media + Society, 2(3), 1–13. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116664220
Rösner, L., Winter, S. & Krämer, N. C. (2016). Dangerous Minds? Effects of Uncivil Online Comments on Aggressive Cognitions, Emotions, and Behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 461–470. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.01.022
Rossini, P. & Maia, R. C. M. (2020). Characterizing Disagreement in Online Political Talk: Examining Incivility and Opinion Expression on News Websites and Facebook in Brazil. Journal of Public Deliberation, 17(1), 90–104. Online: https://doi.org/10.16997/10.16997/jdd.967
Santana, A. D. (2014). Virtuous or Vitriolic? The Effect of Anonymity on Civility in Online Newspaper Reader Comment Boards. Journalism Practice, 8(1), 18–33. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2013.813194
Savin, N. (2023). Democracy and Political Events. Moscow: HSE Publishing House.
Savin, N. (2019). Does Media Matter? Variation of VK and Facebook Deliberative Capacities (Evidence from Discussions on the Crimea Crisis). Communications. Media. Design, 4(3), 119–139.
Scudder, M. F. (2020). Beyond Empathy and Inclusion. The Challenge of Listening in Democratic Deliberation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sobieraj, S. & Berry, J. M. (2011). From Incivility to Outrage: Political Discourse in Blogs, Talk Radio, and Cable News. Political Communication, 28(1), 19–41. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2010.542360
Stiegler, H. & De Jong, M. D. T. (2015). Facilitating Personal Deliberation Online: Immediate Effects of Two ConsiderIt Variations. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 461–469.
Stromer-Galley, J. (2007). Measuring Deliberation’s Content: A Coding Scheme. Journal of Public Deliberation, 3(1), 1–35. Online: https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.50
Stroud, N. J., Scacco, J. M., Muddiman, A. & Curry, A. L. (2015). Changing Deliberative Norms on News Organizations’ Facebook Sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20(2), 188–203. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12104
Stryker, R., Conway, B. A. & Danielson, J. T. (2016). What Is Political Incivility? Communication Monographs, 83(4), 535–556. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2016.1201207
Stuckey, M. E. & O’Rourke, S. P. (2014). Civility, Democracy, and National Politics. Rhetoric and Public Affairs, 17(4): 711–736. Online: http://doi.org/10.14321/rhetpublaffa.17.4.0711
Syvertsen, T. (2020). Digital Detox: The Politics of Disconnecting. Emerald Publishing.
Van Dijk, T. A. ed. (1997). Discourse as Social Interaction. Discourse Studies. A Multidisciplinary Introduction. Vol. 2. Sage Publications.
Volkovskii, D. (2021). Experience of Applied Research in Online Deliberation: An Analysis of Civility in American Online Discussions. IMS 2021 – International Conference “Internet and Modern Society”, 24–26 June 2021, St. Petersburg, Russia. 199–205.
Volkovskii, D. & Filatova, O. (2022). Influence of Media Type on Political E-Discourse: Analysis of Russian and American Discussions on Social Media. In A. V. Chugunov, M. Janssen, I. Khodachek, Y. Misnikov & D. Trutnev (eds.): Electronic Governance and Open Society: Challenges in Eurasia. EGOSE 2021. Communications in Computer and Information Science. Cham: Springer. 119–131.
Vollhardt, J., Coutin, M., Staub, E., Weiss, G. & Deflander, J. (2007). Deconstructing Hate Speech in the DRC: A Psychological Media Sensitization Campaign. Journal of Hate Studies, 5(15), 15–35. Online: http://doi.org/10.33972/jhs.40
Zhang, W., Cao, X. & Tran, M. N. (2013). The Structural Features and the Deliberative Quality of Online Discussions. Telematics and Informatics, 30, 74–86.
Zhang, Z. & Luo, L. (2018). Hate Speech Detection: A Solved Problem? The Challenging Case of Long Tail on Twitter. Semantic Web, 10(5), 925–945. Online: https://doi.org/10.3233/sw-180338