Planetary Defence and NEO Risks

The Place of the Apophis Asteroid on the Torino, Palermo, and CIRAS Scales

doi: 10.32567/hm.2025.4.7

Abstract

The paper introduces evaluation methods for the impact risk of near-Earth objects (NEOs), with a particular focus on the Apophis asteroid—a prime example of the current challenges in planetary defense. The paper explains the workings of the traditional Torino and Palermo scales. Additionally, the Cosmic Impact Risk Assessment Scale (CIRAS) is introduced, which refines risk assessment by integrating seven key factors—energy, impact probability, remaining time until impact, impact location, atmospheric effects, secondary hazards, and mitigation difficulty. The close approach of Apophis in 2029 serves as an exceptional case study. While the initial uncertain orbital data suggested a high risk, the most recent measurements indicate an almost negligible chance of collision. The study emphasizes that the combined use of these scales not only allows for clearer communication of risks but also supports the development of targeted planetary defense strategies. This new approach enables more reliable forecasts, contributing to improved social and technological preparedness as well as the timely detection of potential hazards. Overall, the research underlines the importance of detailed, multidimensional risk assessments that facilitate swift responses and the implementation of preventive measures, thereby ensuring Earth’s safety against potential cosmic threats. This approach opens new horizons in the field of planetary defense.

Keywords:

planetary defense Torino Scale near-earth objects Palermo Scale risk assessment impact probability energy release multidimensional risk index

References

Apophis ESA (2025). Online: https://www.esa.int/Space_Safety/Planetary_Defence/Apophis

ARTEMIEVA, Natalia – SHUVALOV, Valery (2016): From Tunguska to Chelyabinsk via Jupiter. Annual Review Earth & Planetary Sciences, 44, 37–56. Online: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-earth-060115-012218

BINZEL, Richard P. (2000): The Torino Impact Hazard Scale. Planetary and Space Science, 48(4), 297–303. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-0633(00)00006-4

BOROVIČKA, Jiří (2016): The Chelyabinsk Event. Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union, 11(A29A), 247–252. Online: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743921316002982

CHESLEY, Steven. R. et al. (2002): Quantifying the Risk Posed by Potential Earth Impacts. Icarus, 159(2), 423–432. Online: https://doi.org/10.1006/icar.2002.6910

ÉRCES Gergő – VASS Gyula (2018): Veszélyes ipari üzemek tűzvédelme – ipari üzemek fenntartható tűzbiztonságának fejlesztési lehetőségei a komplex tűzvédelem tekintetében. Műszaki Katonai Közlöny, 28(4), 2–22. Online: https://mkk.uni-nke.hu/document/mkk-uni-nke-hu/2018_4_01_Erces%20G%20-%20Vass%20Gy_MKK_cikk.pdf

KERESZTÚRI Ákos – SÁRNECZKY Krisztián (2023): Célpont a Föld? Kisbolygók a láthatáron. Budapest: Magyar Csillagászati Egyesület.

KERESZTÚRI Ákos – TÓTH Imre (2008): Kisbolygó vagy üstökös? A Tunguz-esemény. Meteor, 38(6), 3–9. Online: https://epa.oszk.hu/03000/03054/00358/pdf/EPA03054_meteor_2008_06.pdf

KRING, David A. (2017): Guidebook to the Geology of Barringer Meteorite Crater, Arizona (a.k.a. Meteor Crater). [H. n.]: Lunar and Planetary Institute.

MORRISON, David (2018): Tunguska Workshop: Applying Modern Tools to Understand the 1908 Tunguska Impact. NASA/Technical Memorandum (NASA/TM—220174). Online: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20190002302/downloads/20190002302.pdf

PALLAGI András (2023): Kritikus infrastuktúrák védelmének vizsgálata. PhD-disszertáció. Budapest: Óbudai Egyetem Biztonságtudományi Doktori Iskola. Online: https://bdi.uni-obuda.hu/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Doktori-PhD-ertekezes-Pallagi-Andras.pdf

POPE, Kevin O. et al. (1997): Energy, Volatile Production, and Climatic Effects of the Chicxulub Cretaceous/Tertiary Impact. Journal of Geophysical Research, 102(E9), 21645–21664. Online: https://doi.org/10.1029/97JE01743

REDDY, Vishnu et al. (2022): Apophis Planetary Defense Campaign. The Planetary Science Journal, 3(5), 1–16. Online: https://doi.org/10.3847/PSJ/ac66eb

SCHMIEDER, Martin – KRING, David A. (2020): Earth’s Impact Events Through Geologic Time: A List of Recommended Ages for Terrestrial Impact Structures and Deposits. Astrobiology, 20(1), 91–141. Online: https://doi.org/10.1089/ast.2019.2085

YAU, Kevin – WEISSMAN, Paul – YEOMANS, Donald (1994): Meteorite Falls in China and Some

Related Human Casualty Events. Meteoritics, 29(6), 864–871. Online: https://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1994Metic..29..864Y