A bölcsészet-, társadalomtudományi és pedagógiai szakokon tanuló hallgatók perspektívái a mesterséges intelligencia lehetőségeiről és kockázatairól, 2. rész
Copyright (c) 2026 Bányász-Váczi Kincső Boróka, Rajki Zoltán

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Absztrakt
A tanulmány egy kétrészes cikksorozat második része. Az első rész elméleti keretet és átfogó szakirodalmi áttekintést adott, míg a jelen írás 1027 bölcsészettudományi, társadalomtudományi és pedagógiai képzésben részt vevő hallgató kérdőíves vizsgálatának eredményeit elemzi. A kutatás célja annak feltárása volt, hogy a hallgatók miként értékelik a mesterséges intelligencia jövőbeli szerepét a mindennapi életben és a munkaerőpiacon, milyen kockázatokat azonosítanak, valamint milyen jelentőséget tulajdonítanak az MI-kompetenciáknak saját karrierjük szempontjából. A válaszadók többsége számottevő társadalmi hatással számol, ugyanakkor a karrierre gyakorolt hatás megítélése differenciált. A hallgatók 42,5%-a nem vár érdemi befolyást pályájára, 30,4% pozitív, 27,2% negatív következményekkel számol. Az MI-technológiák ismeretét 70,3% fontosnak vagy elengedhetetlennek tartja. A kockázatészlelés különösen erős a vizuális manipuláció, az álhírek terjesztése, az adatvédelem és a magánélet védelme esetében, a nők és a levelező tagozatos hallgatók több dimenzióban magasabb kockázati értékeket adtak. A rendszeres MI-használók nagyobb arányban várnak pozitív karrierhatást (39,5%), mint a nem használók (26,2%), miközben a nem használók körében gyakoribb a semleges álláspont (47,1%). Az MI-használattól teljesen elzárkózók 64,8%-a nem tartja fontosnak az MI-eszközök ismeretét. Az eredmények alapján a karrierpercepció a használati tapasztalat, a kockázatészlelés és a demográfiai jellemzők együttes hatásaként értelmezhető. A 68,1%-os nem használói arány arra utal, hogy az MI felsőoktatási integrációja korlátozott, ami célzott kompetenciafejlesztést indokol, különösen a humán és pedagógiai képzési területeken.
Kulcsszavak:
Hogyan kell idézni
Hivatkozások
AŞIKSOY, Gülsüm (2024): An Investigation of University Students’ Attitudes Towards Artificial Intelligence Ethics. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 14(8), 153–169. Online: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v14i8.50769
BÁNYÁSZ-VÁCZI Kincső Boróka – RAJKI Zoltán (2025): A bölcsészet-, társadalomtudományi és pedagógiai szakokon tanuló hallgatók perspektívái a mesterséges intelligencia lehetőségeiről és kockázatairól, 1. rész: Szakirodalmi áttekintés. Hadmérnök, 20(1), 187–201. Online: https://doi.org/10.32567/hm.2025.1.10
BARRERA-JIMENEZ, Felipe et al. (2025): Invulnerability Bias in Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence’s Future Impact on Employment. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 28698. Online: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-14698-2
BASCH, Corey et al. (2025): Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: Student Knowledge, Attitudes, and Ethical Perceptions in the United States. SDGs Studies Review, 6, e034. Online: https://doi.org/10.37497/sdgs.v6istudies.34
BAVADHARANI, K. – ROSHAN, K. – KALAIVANI, N. (2025): Artificial Intelligence Awareness and its Influence on Career Decision-Making Among University Students. ASET Journal Management Science, 4(2), 325–333. Online: https://doi.org/10.47059/ajms/v4i2/33
BEWERSDORFF, Arne et al. (2025): AI Advocates and Cautious Critics: How AI Attitudes, AI Interest, Use of AI, and AI Literacy Build University Students’ AI Self-Efficacy. Computers and Education: Artifical Intelligence, 8, 100340. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100340
BORWEIN, Sophie et al. (2026): Explaining Women’s Skepticism Toward Artificial Intelligence: The Role of Risk Orientation and Risk Exposure. PNAS Nexus, 5(1), pgaf399. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf399
BRAUNER, Philipp et al. (2023): What Does the Public Think About Artificial Intelligence? –A Criticality Map to Understand Bias in the Public Perception of AI. Frontiers in Computer Science, 5. Online: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2023.1113903
CACHERO, Cristina – TOMÁS, David – PUJOL, Francisco A. (2025): Gender Bias in Self-Perception of AI Knowledge, Impact, and Support among Higher Education Students: An Observational Study. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 25(2), 1–26. Online: https://doi.org/10.1145/3721295
CHOUDHARY, Satyanarayan – NIROULA, Arjun Kumar – PANT, Ganesh Datt (2025): Beyond Discipline: Quantifying the Impact of Prior AI Experience and Digital Literacy on Student Acceptance of Educational AI. Nepal Journal Multidisciplinary Research, 8(2), 186–195. Online: https://doi.org/10.3126/njmr.v8i2.78027
DE LOYOLA, Rhyan et al. (2024): Sentiment Analysis of AI’s Impact on Labor Market: Opportunities and Threats. Philippine Journal of Science Engineering Technology, 1(1), 48–54.
DOLENC, Kosta – BRUMEN, Mihaela (2024): Exploring Social and Computer Science Students’ Perceptions of AI Integration in (Foreign) Language Instruction. Computers and Education: Artifical Intelligence, 7, 100285. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100285
DOROTIC, Matilda – STAGNO, Emanuela – WARLOP, Luk (2023): AI on The Street: Context-Dependent Responses to Artificial Intelligence. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 41(1), 113–137. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2023.08.010
GHERHEȘ, Vasile – OBRAD, Ciprian (2018): Technical and Humanities Students’ Perspectives on the Development and Sustainability of Artificial Intelligence (AI). Sustainability, 10(9), 3066. Online: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093066
GHOTBI, N. – HO, Manh-Tung (2021): Moral Awareness of College Students Regarding Artificial Intelligence. Asian Bioethics Review, 13, 421–433. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41649-021-00182-2
HRUŠKA, Adam – ROUBÍK, Hynek (2025): Fear of the Future in the Context of the Emergence of Generative Artificial Intelligence Among Young Adults: The Case of Czechia. Advances in Distributed Computing and Artifical Intelligence Journal, 14, e32644. Online: https://doi.org/10.14201/adcaij.32644
IVANOVA, A. E. – TARASOVA, K. V. – TALOV, D. P. (2025): Between Interest and Skill: How Students Perceive and Use AI (Между интересом и умением: как студенты воспринимают и применяют ИИ). Vysshee Obrazovanie V Rossii Higher Education in Russia, 34(8–9), 9–32, Online: https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2025-34-8-9-9-32
LI, Yifu – CASTULO, Nilo Jayoma – XU, Xiaoyuan (2025): Embracing or Rejecting AI? A Mixed-Method Study on Undergraduate Students’ Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence at a Private University in China. Frontiers in Education, 10. Online: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1505856
LIANG, Yanlong – ZHAI, Yun (2025): The Impact of Artificial Intelligence Impact Awareness on College Students’ Employment Risk Perception: A Moderated Mediation Model. Acta Psychologica, 261, 105808. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105808
LIU, Xuan – CHEN, Yuci (2025): The Impact of Artificial Intelligence Usage on Employee Career Commitment: The Moderating Role of Artificial Intelligence Awareness. American Journal of Applied Psychology, 14(3), 101–112. Online: https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajap.20251403.14
LÜNICH, Marco – KELLER, Birte – MARCINKOWSKI, Frank (2024): Diverging Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: A Comparison of Student and Public Assessments on Risks and Damages of Academic Performance Prediction in Germany. Computers and Education: Artifical Intelligence, 7, 100305. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100305
MØGELVANG, Anja – GRASSINI, Simone (2025): Validating the AI Attitude Scale (AIAS-4) and Exploring Attitudinal Differences in a Large Sample of Norwegian University Students. Discover Education, 4, 212. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00657-6
MOON, Su-Ji (2024): Effects of Perception of Potential Risk in Generative AI on Attitudes and Intention to Use. International Journal on Advanced Science Engineering Information Technology, 14(5), 1748–1755. Online: https://doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.14.5.20445
MUSYAFFI, Ayatulloh Michael et al. (2024): Improving Students’ Openness to Artificial Intelligence Through Risk Awareness and Digital Literacy: Evidence Form a Developing Country. Social Sciences Humanities Open, 10, 101168. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101168
NKEDISHU, Victor Chukwubueze – OKONTA, Vinella (2024): Unpacking Optimism versus Concern: Tertiary Students’ Multidimensional Views on the Rise of Artificial Intelligence (AI). Int. Res. J. Multidiscip. Scope, 5(4), 362–377. Online: https://doi.org/10.47857/irjms.2024.05i04.01261
OTERMANS, Pauldy C. J. – ROBERTS, Charlotte – BAINES, Stephanie (2025): Unveiling AI Perceptions: How Student Attitudes Towards AI Shape AI Awareness, Usage, and Conceptions. International Journal of Technology in Education, 8(1), 88–103. Online: https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.995
PARK, Yong Jin et al. (2022): Digital Assistants: Inequalities and Social Context of Access, Use, and Perceptual Understanding. Poetics, 93, 101689. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2022.101689
PONCE ROJO, Antonio et al. (2025): From Digital Natives to AI Natives: Emerging Competencies and Media and Information Literacy in Higher Education. Education Sciences, 15(9), 1134. Online: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15091134
SAID, Nadia et al. (2023): An Artificial Intelligence Perspective: How Knowledge and Confidence Shape Risk and Benefit Perception. Computers in Human Behavior, 149, 107855. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107855
SANTOS-JAÉN, José Manuel et al. (2025): University Students’ Perceptions of the Impact of Artificial Intelligence in the Business Sector on Their Educational and Professional Development. Education and Information Technologies, 30(17), 24395–24428. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13712-4
STÖHR, Christian – OU, Amy Wanyu – MALMSTRÖM, Hans (2024): Perceptions and Usage of AI Chatbots Among Students in Higher Education Across Genders, Academic Levels and Fields of Study. Computers and Education: Artifical Intelligence, 7, 100259. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100259
SUMARYANTO, Sumaryanto – RICADONNA, Nadia Adriane – SUSANTI, Nani Irma (2026): How Perceived Risk Shapes User Satisfaction and Continuance Intention Toward AI-Based Applications in Higher Education ? International Journal of Business, Law, and Education, 7(1), 55–66. Online: https://doi.org/10.56442/ijble.v7i1.1333
TEIXEIRA, Sónia et al. (2022): An Exploratory Diagnosis of Artificial Intelligence Risks for a Responsible Governance. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, ACM, 25–31. Online: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3560107.3560298
VÁZQUEZ-PARRA, José Carlos et al. (2024): Importance of University Students’ Perception of Adoption and Training in Artificial Intelligence Tools. Societies, 14(8), 141. Online: https://doi.org/10.3390/soc14080141
VOLYNETS, Viktoriia – TRACH, Yuliia (2025): Ethical Awareness of Youth about Artificial Intelligence: Education, Risks, Regulation (Етична обізнаність молоді щодо штучного інтелекту: освіта, ризики, регулювання). Digital Platform Information Technologies in Sociocultural Sphere, 8(2), 289–298. Online: https://doi.org/10.31866/2617-796x.8.2.2025.347871
WANG, Chengliang et al. (2024): Factors Influencing University Students’ Behavioral Intention to Use Generative Artificial Intelligence: Integrating the Theory of Planned Behavior and AI Literacy. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 41(11), 6649–6671. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2383033
YAROVENKO, Hanna et al. (2024): The Future of Artificial Intelligence: Fear, Hope or Indifference? Human Technology, 20(3), 611–639. Online: https://doi.org/10.14254/1795-6889.2024.20-3.10
ZHANG, Xiaoxuan et al. (2025): Integrating AI Literacy with the TPB-TAM Framework to Explore Chinese University Students’ Adoption of Generative AI. Behavioral Science, 15(10), 1398. Online: https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15101398