The Need to Develop a Standardised Audit Methodology for the Safety Management System
Copyright (c) 2025 Szabó Ádám
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Absztrakt
The basic condition for the operation of plants dealing with hazardous materials is the official approval of the safety documentation, which also presents the safety management system, and its regular official inspection. There is no standardised methodology for the regular official inspection of the safety management system, so the experience and personal preferences of the person performing the inspection play a significant role in the subject matter. In this article, the author aims to analyse and evaluate the circumstances that hinder the regular inspection of safety management systems established in plants dealing with hazardous materials, based on which he proposes a methodology supporting regular inspection.
Kulcsszavak:
Hivatkozások
BOGNÁR, Balázs – KÁTAI-URBÁN, Lajos – KOSSA, György – KOZMA, Sándor – SZAKÁL, Béla – VASS, Gyula eds. (2013): Iparbiztonságtan I. Kézikönyv az iparbiztonsági üzemeltetői és hatósági feladatok ellátásához. Budapest: Nemzeti Közszolgálati Egyetem.
CONLIN, Helen – BRABAZON, Philip G. – KING, Lee (2004): Exploring the Role and Content of the Safety Case. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 82(4), 283–290. Online: https://doi.org/10.1205/095758204323162300
HALÁSZ, László – FÖLDI, László (2014): Környezetbiztonság. Budapest: Nemzeti Közszolgálati Egyetem. Online: https://tudasportal.uni-nke.hu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/20.500.12944/100403/562.pdf?sequence=1
HALE, Andrew – BORYS, David (2013): Working to Rule, or Working Safely? Part 1: A State of the Art Review. Safety Science, 55(1), 207–221. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2012.05.011
ICAO (2013): Safety Management Manual (SMM), Doc 9859. International Civil Aviation Organization.
KANYÓ, Ferenc – VARGA, Ferenc (2016): Sportcsarnoktűz a Testnevelési Egyetemen. Védelem Katasztrófavédelmi Szemle, 23(1), 47–49.
MESICS, Zoltán (2017): A biztonsági irányítási rendszerek hatékonyságának fejlesztése: karbantartási rend. Bolyai Szemle, 26(2), 72–91.
MESICS, Zoltán – KÁTAI-URBÁN, Lajos (2015a): Veszélyes üzemi biztonsági irányítási rendszer működtetése. Hadmérnök, 10(1), 99–107.
MESICS, Zoltán – KÁTAI-URBÁN, Lajos (2015b): Biztonsági irányítási rendszer értékelése. Hadmérnök, 10(1), 108–118.
MIHÁLY, István – BÉRCZI, László – BOGNÁR, Balázs – KÁTAI-URBÁN, Maxim – TÓTH, Levente – KÁTAI-URBÁN, Lajos – VASS, Gyula – VARGA, Ferenc (2025): Experimental Study to Determine the Leakage Area of Single-Leaf Smoke Control Doors in the Design of Pressure Differential Systems. Fire, 8(1). Online: https://doi.org/10.3390/fire8010005
MITCHINSON, Neil – PAPADAKIS, Georgios (1999): Safety Management Systems under Seveso II: Implementation and Assessment. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 12(1), 43–51. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-4230(98)00036-9
OECD (2008): Guidance on Developing Safety Performance Indicators Related to Chemical Accident Prevention, Preparedness, and Response. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Environment Directorate.
OECD (2018): Safety Management Systems. History, Implementation and Effectiveness. Paris: OECD Publishing.
STOLZER, Alan J. – FRIEND, Mark A. – TRUONG, Dothang – TUCCIO, William A. – AGUIAR, Marisa (2018): Measuring and Evaluating Safety Management System Effectiveness Using Data Envelopment Analysis. Science Direct, 104(1), 55–69. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.12.037
VASS, Gyula – HALÁSZ, László (2007): Assessment of the Land-use Planning Practices Applied in the Vicinity of EU Seveso Establishments. AARMS, 6(1), 77–88.
VASS, Gyula – MESICS, Zoltán – KOVÁCS, Balázs (2016): Útmutató a biztonsági irányítási rendszerekkel kapcsolatban a SEVESO III. irányelv hazai bevezetésével módosuló jogszabályi előírások végrehajtásához. Budapest: BM OKF.