Green Label
Investigating Environmental Labelling as a Communication Tool in Hungary
Copyright (c) 2025 Balázs Tamás Fekete, Sass Judit
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Abstract
Empirical research suggests that labelling individuals as environmentally conscious based on their past behaviours can strengthen their attitudes to the environment and promote further eco-friendly actions, resulting in positive spillover effects. This study aims to test the effectiveness of environmental labelling as a communication tool for energy conservation and domestic product consumption. The online survey of 668 Hungarian participants used an experimental design. Although the effects were weak, even brief exposure to labelling messages resulted in statistically significant changes in environmental attitudes, while no significant effect was found on behavioural intentions. We hypothesise that repeated exposure to similar messages could reinforce attitudes and result in behavioural change. Additionally, the study sought to identify social groups that may serve as target audiences for environmental labelling related to domestic product preferences. Cluster analysis suggests that individuals with conservative views and a preference for right-wing political parties may be particularly responsive to this communication tool. We must add that the non-probabilistic snowball sampling method and the resulting overrepresentation of young, urban and liberal individuals limits the generalisability of the findings for the broader Hungarian population, so further research based on nationally representative samples is needed to validate these results.
Keywords:
How to Cite
References
Albarracín, D. & McNatt, P. S. (2005). Maintenance and Decay of Past Behavior Influences: Anchoring Attitudes on Beliefs Following Inconsistent Actions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(6), 719–733. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204272180
Balabanis, G., Diamantopoulos, A., Mueller, R. D. & Melewar, T. C. (2001). The Impact of Nationalism, Patriotism, and Internationalism on Consumer Ethnocentric Tendencies. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(1), 157–175. Online: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490943
Bem, D. J. (1972). Self-Perception Theory. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (pp. 1–62). Academic Press. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60024-6
Berács, J. & Malota, E. (2000). Fogyasztói etnocentrizmus: Etnocentrizmus és országeredet-imázs kapcsolata a termékválasztásban. Vezetéstudomány, 31(4), 25–38.
Bosmans, A. M. M. & Warlop, L. (2005). How Vulnerable Are Consumers to Blatant Persuasion Attempts? Advances in Consumer Research, 32, 506. Online: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.869978
Brehm, S. S. & Brehm, J. W. (1981). Psychological Reactance. A Theory of Freedom and Control. Academic Press.
Carrico, A. R., Truelove, H. B., Vandenbergh, M. P. & Dana, D. (2015). Does Learning about Climate Change Adaptation Change Support for Mitigation? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 41, 19–29. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.10.009
Cialdini, R. B. (2003). Crafting Normative Messages to Protect the Environment. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(4), 105–109. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.01242
Cornelissen, G. (2007). Rendering Sustainable Consumer Behavior More Sustainable. Psychological Tools for Marketing Pro-Social Commitment. PhD Dissertation. Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.
Cornelissen, G., Dewitte, S., Warlop, L. & Yzerbyt, V. (2007). Whatever People Say I Am, That’s What I Am: Social Labeling as a Social Marketing Tool. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 24(4), 278–288. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2007.05.001
Cornelissen, G., Pandelaere, M., Warlop, L. & Dewitte, S. (2008). Positive Cueing: Promoting Sustainable Consumer Behavior by Cueing Common Environmental Behaviors as Environmental. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 25(1), 46–55. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2007.06.002
Cruz, S. M. (2017). The Relationships of Political Ideology and Party Affiliation with Environmental Concern: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 53, 81–91. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.06.010
Csanádi, A., Harsányi, Sz. G. & Szabó, É. (2009). Lezárási igény kérdőív: A Need for Closure Scale magyar verziójának tesztelése egyetemista mintán. Alkalmazott Pszichológia, 11(1–2), 55–81.
Dunlap, R. E. & McCright, A. M. (2008). A Widening Gap: Republican and Democratic Views on Climate Change. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 50(5), 26–35. Online: https://doi.org/10.3200/ENVT.50.5.26-35
Eby, B., Carrico, A. R. & Truelove, H. B. (2019). The Influence of Environmental Identity Labeling on the Uptake of Pro-Environmental Behaviors. Climatic Change, 155(4), 563–580. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02501-x
Fekete, B. (2022a). A környezetbarát cselekedetek pszichológiai háttere és ösztönzésének lehetőségei. In T. Dezső & I. Pócza (Eds.), Batthyány Lajos Alapítvány Doktori Ösztöndíjprogram Tanulmánykötet 2020/2021 (pp. 154–174). BLA Tudástár.
Fekete, B. (2022b). A fenntarthatóság rejtett motivációinak kvalitatív vizsgálata a magyar lakosság körében. In T. Dezső & I. Pócza (Eds.), Batthyány Lajos Alapítvány Doktori Ösztöndíjprogram Tanulmánykötet 2021/2022 (pp. 140–152). BLA Tudástár.
Festinger, L. (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford University Press.
Fielding, K. S. & Hornsey, M. J. (2016). A Social Identity Analysis of Climate Change and Environmental Attitudes and Behaviors: Insights and Opportunities. Frontiers in Psychology, 7. Online: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00121
Gilbert, D. T., Krull, D. S. & Malone, P. S. (1990). Unbelieving the Unbelievable: Some Problems in the Rejection of False Information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(4), 601–613. Online: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.4.601
Hámori, J. & Horváth, Á. (2009). A hazai élelmiszerek megítélésének és preferenciájának vizsgálata. Élelmiszer, Táplálkozás és Marketing, 6(2–3), 87–94.
Henn, L., Otto, S. & Kaiser, F. G. (2020). Positive Spillover: The Result of Attitude Change. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 69. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101429
Kahneman, D. (2012). Thinking, Fast and Slow. Penguin Books.
Kaiser, F. G. & Wilson, M. (2004). Goal-directed Conservation Behavior: The Specific Composition of a General Performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 36(7), 1531–1544. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2003.06.003
Lacasse, K. (2016). Don’t Be Satisfied, Identify! Strengthening Positive Spillover by Connecting Pro-Environmental Behaviors to an “Environmentalist” Label. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 48, 149–158. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.09.006
Magyar Termék Nonprofit Kft. (2017). A vevők többségének számít, hogy magyar élelmiszert vásároljon. Online: https://amag yartermek.hu/hirek/a-vevok-tobbsegenek-szamit-hog y-mag yar-elelmiszertvasaroljon/300/
Malota, E. (2003). A hazai termékek preferálása. Marketing és Menedzsment, 2(3), 28–37.
McCright, A. M., Dunlap, R. E. & Marquart-Pyatt, S. T. (2016). Political Ideology and Views about Climate Change in the European Union. Environmental Politics, 25(2), 338–358. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2015.1090371
Medvés, D. (2012). A környezettudatosság pszichológiai meghatározói. A társas érték, a kognitív korlátok és a társadalmi dilemma. PhD Dissertation. Debreceni Egyetem.
Milfont, T. L. (2009). The Effects of Social Desirability on Self-Reported Environmental Attitudes and Ecological Behaviour. The Environmentalist, 29, 263–269. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-008-9192-2
Milfont, T. L. & Duckitt, J. (2010). The Environmental Attitudes Inventory: A Valid and Reliable Measure to Assess the Structure of Environmental Attitudes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(1), 80–94. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.09.001
Mónus, F., Béres, T. & Sipos, F. (2022). Egyetemi hallgatók környezettudatossága a materializmus, az élettel való elégedettség, a politikai, illetve a pandémiával kapcsolatos nézeteik függvényében. Metszetek, 11(1), 70–97. Online: https://doi.org/10.18392/metsz/2022/1/5
Naár, A. (2022). A magyar háztartások villamosenergia-fogyasztási magatartásmintázatainak feltárása a fenntarthatóság kontextusában. PhD Dissertation. Magyar Agrár- és Élettudományi Egyetem.
Papp-Váry, Á. & Zahorecz, B. (2017). A származási hely (made-in) marketingkommunikációs stratégiái – és miként élhetnek velük a magyar márkák? In R. Richárd & T. Czeglédy (Eds.), Geopolitikai stratégiák Közép-Európában tanulmánykötet (pp. 459–472). Soproni Egyetem Kiadó.
Petty, R. E. & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and Persuasion. Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change. Springer.
Poortinga, W., Steg, L. & Vlek, C. (2008). Values, Environmental Concern, and Environmental Behavior: A Study into Household Energy Use. Environment and Behavior, 36(1), 70–93. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916503251466
Poortinga, W., Whitmarsh, L. & Suffolk, C. (2013). The Introduction of a Single-Use Carrier Bag Charge in Wales: Attitude Change and Behavioural Spillover Effects. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 36, 240–247. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.09.001
Raghubir, P. & Menon, G. (2005). When and Why Is Ease of Retrieval Informative? Memory & Cognition, 33(4), 821–832. Online: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193077
Reber, R., Schwarz, N. & Winkielman, P. (2004). Processing Fluency and Aesthetic Pleasure: Is Beauty in the Perceiver’s Processing Experience? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(4), 364–382. Online: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_3
Reich, J. W. & Robertson, J. L. (1979). Reactance and Norm Appeal in Anti‑Littering Messages. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 9(1), 91–101. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1979.tb00796.x
Schäfferné, D. K. (2007). Az energiatakarékosság környezetvédelmi szempontú megközelítése a hétvégi házak fűtési rendszereiben. Környezetvédelmi és Területfejlesztési Szemle, 14(1), 81–92.
Schneider, M. & Medgyesi, M. (2020). Környezettel és környezetvédelemmel kapcsolatos lakossági attitűdök változása Magyarországon. In T. Kolosi, I. Szelényi & I. Tóth (Eds.), Társadalmi Riport 2020 (pp. 375–396). TÁRKI.
Schultz, P. W. (2002). Knowledge, Education, and Household Recycling: Examining the Knowledge-Deficit Model of Behavior Change. In T. Dietz & P. Stern (Eds.), New Tools for Environmental Protection. Education, Information, and Voluntary Measures (pp. 67–82). National Academy Press.
Staats, H. J., Wit, A. P. & Midden, C. J. H. (1996). Communicating the Greenhouse Effect to the Public: Evaluation of a Mass Media Campaign from a Social Dilemma Perspective. Journal of Environmental Management, 46(2), 189–203. Online: https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.1996.0015
Stanley, L. R. & Lasonde, K. M. (1996). The Relationship between Environmental Issue Involvement and Environmentally-Conscious Behavior: An Exploratory Study. Advances in Consumer Research, 23(1), 183–188.
Sutton, S. G. & Gyuris, E. (2015). Optimizing the Environmental Attitudes Inventory: Establishing a Baseline of Change in Students’ Environmental Attitudes. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 16(1), 16–33. Online: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-03-2013-0027
T. Nagy-Pető, D., Szakály, Z. & Kiss, V. Á. (2023). A helyi termékekkel kapcsolatos fogyasztói elvárások összehasonlító vizsgálata. Marketing & Menedzsment, 57(1), 49–57. Online: https://doi.org/10.15170/MM.2023.57.01.05
Thaler, R. H. & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge. Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness. Yale University Press.
Truelove, H. B., Carrico, A. R., Weber, E. U., Raimi, K. T. & Vandenbergh, M. P. (2014). Positive and Negative Spillover of Pro-Environmental Behavior: An Integrative Review and Theoretical Framework. Global Environmental Change, 29, 127–138. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.09.004
Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131. Online: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
Van der Werff, E., Steg, L. & Keizer, K. (2013). The Value of Environmental Self-Identity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 34, 55–63. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.12.006
Van Liere, K. D. & Dunlap, R. E. (1980). The Social Bases of Environmental Concern: A Review of Hypotheses, Explanations, and Empirical Evidence. Public Opinion Quarterly, 44(2), 181–197. Online: https://doi.org/10.1086/268583
Van Vugt, M. (2001). Community Identification Moderating the Impact of Financial Incentives in a Natural Social Dilemma: Water Conservation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(11), 1440–1449. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672012711005
Varga, A., Ágoston, Cs., Buvár, Á., Szabó, Á. Z. & Dúll, A. (2024). Környezetvédő cselekedetek és ezek gátló tényezői a magyar felnőtt lakosság körében. Észak-magyarországi Stratégiai Füzetek, 21(1), 27–35. Online: https://doi.org/10.32976/stratfuz.2024.3
Webster, D. M. & Kruglanski, A. W. (1994). Individual Differences in Need for Cognitive Closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(6), 1049–1062. Online: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.1049
Wiseman, M. & Bogner, F. X. (2003). A Higher-Order Model of Ecological Values and Its Relationship to Personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 34(5), 783–794. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00071-5
Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal Effects of Mere Exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(2), 1–27. Online: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025848
