KOME

About journal

KOME is a theory and pure research-oriented journal of communication studies and related fields. Therefore theoretical researches and discussions that help to understand better, or reconceptualize the understanding of communication or the media are its center of interests; being either an useful supplement to, or a reasonable alternative to current models and theories. Given the connection between theory and empirical research, we are open to submissions of empirical papers if the research demonstrates a clear endorsement of communication and media theories. We are also committed to the ideas of trans- and interdisciplinarity and prefer topics that are relevant for more than one special discipline of social sciences. Articles published in KOME should represent the diversity that comprises the study of communication and related disciplines, regardless of philosophical paradigms and in favor of methodological pluralism. KOME encourage the use of non-sexist language in research writing.


object(Publication)#1042 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(24) { ["id"]=> int(8772) ["accessStatus"]=> int(0) ["lastModified"]=> string(19) "2026-05-28 13:13:33" ["primaryContactId"]=> int(11331) ["sectionId"]=> int(133) ["seq"]=> int(0) ["submissionId"]=> int(8647) ["status"]=> int(1) ["version"]=> int(1) ["categoryIds"]=> array(0) { } ["citationsRaw"]=> string(10467) "Aion (1834–1843) National Library of Greece. Digital Newspaper Collection. Online: http://rg-dev.nlg.gr/archive/search?sort=rel&serials_of_issues%5B7%5D=%CE%91%CE%B9%CF%8E%CE%BD%E2%80%A179546 Akropolis (1883–1885) National Library of Greece. Digital Newspaper Collection. Online: http://rg-dev.nlg.gr/archive/search?sort=rel&serials_of_issues%5B8%5D=%CE%91%CE%BA%CF%81%CF%8C%CF%80%CE%BF%CE%BB%CE%B9%CF%82%E2%80%A150 Akropolis, 26.6.1884. Athens. Akropolis, 9.5.1884. Athens. Anagnostopoulou, D. (2007). Αναπαραστάσεις του γυναικείου στη λογοτεχνία [Representations of Women in Literature]. Patakis. Anagnostopoulou, D., Papadatos, G. & Papantonnakis, G. (Eds.). (2013). Γυναικείες και ανδρικές αναπαραστάσεις στη λογοτεχνία για παιδιά και νέους [Female and Male Representations in Literature for Children and Young People]. Papadopoulos. Beechey, V. (1988). Women and Production. A Social Analysis. Routledge. Berger, P. L. & Luckmann, T. (1966). The Social Construction of Reality. A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Anchor Books. Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and Symbolic Power. Harvard University Press. Couldry, N. (2003). Media Rituals. A Critical Approach. Routledge. Doulkeri, T. (1990). Μέσα Μαζικής επικοινωνίας και ισότητα των δύο φύλων. Μια πρώτη θεωρητική προσέγγιση και εμπειρική έρευνα [Mass Media and Gender Equality. A First Theoretical Approach and Empirical Research]. Papazisi. Droulia, L. (Ed.). (2005). Ο ελληνικός τύπος 1784 έως σήμερα. Ιστορικές και θεωρητικές προσεγγίσεις, Πρακτικά Διεθνούς Συνεδρίου [The Greek Press, 1784 to the Present. Historical and Theoretical Approaches. Proceedings of the International Conference], Athens. Institute for Neohellenic Research/National Hellenic Research Foundation. Empros (1896–1899) National Library of Greece. Digital Newspaper Collection. Online: http://rg-dev.nlg.gr/archive/search?sort=rel&serials_of_issues%5B1%5D=%CE%95%CE%BC%CF%80%CF%81%CF%8C%CF%82%E2%80%A124 Empros, 10.01.1897. Empros, 11.12.1899. Empros, 12.12.1896. Empros, 16.11.1897. Empros, 2.12.1896. Empros, 30.12.1899. Empros, 5.1.1899. Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x Federici, S. (2004). Caliban and the Witch. Women, the Body and Primitive Accumulation. Autonomedia. Finch, A. (2000). Women’s Writing in Nineteenth-Century France. Cambridge University Press. Friedan, B. (1963). The Feminine Mystique. W. W. Norton & Company. Fuller, M. (1845). Woman in the Nineteenth Century. Greeley & McElrath. Georgiadou-Kountoura, E. (2000). Η Γυναίκα στη Νεοελληνική Ζωγραφική του ΙΘ’ Αιώνα: Εικόνα και Δημιουργός. Στο συλλογικό έργο Κενά στην Ιστορία της Τέχνης – Γυναίκες Καλλιτέχνιδες [The Woman in 19th Century Modern Greek Painting: Image and Artist. In the Collective Work “Gaps in the History of Art – Women Artists”] (pp. 59–78). Gvostis. Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M. & Signorielli, N. (1986). Living with Television: The Dynamics of the Cultivation Process. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Perspectives on Media Effects (pp.17–40). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame Analysis. An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Harper & Row. Gotsi, G. (2018). Βλέμματα γυναικών στην τέχνη (1850–1900) [Women’s Perspectives in Art (1850–1900)]. Nefeli. Hall, S. (1980). Encoding/Decoding. In S. Hall, D. Hobson, A. Lowe & P. Willis (Eds.), Culture, Media, Language (pp. 128–138). Hutchinson. Hall, S. (1997). Representation. Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices. Sage. Hionidou, V. (2005). Domestic Service on Three Greek Islands in the Later Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries. The History of the Family, 10(4), 473–489. Hochschild, A. (1983). The Managed Heart. Commercialization of Human Feeling. University of California Press. Hooks, B. (1992). Black Looks. Race and Representation. South End Press. Kladou-Kranidioti, M. (1996). Φιλανθρωπία και κοινωνική πρόνοια: Τα πρώτα βήματα του ελληνικού κράτους (1830–1880) [Philanthropy and Social Welfare. The First Steps of the Greek State (1830–1880)]. Estia. Konstantinidou, Ch. (1997). Η αναπαράσταση του κατά φύλο καταμερισμού της εργασίας στον ημερήσιο αθηναϊκό Τύπο [The Representation of the Gender Division of Labour in the Daily Athenian Press]. PhD Dissertation, Panteion University, Department of Sociology, Section of Social Morphology, Athens. Kontaxi, K. M. (2020). Αναπαραστάσεις του γυναικείου φύλου σε εφημερίδες της πόλης του Αγρινίου κατά την περίοδο 1950–1985: λαογραφική και ανθρωπολογική προσέγγιση [Representations of the Female Gender in Newspapers of the City of Agrinio during the Period 1950–1985: A Folkloric and Anthropological Approach]. Doctoral Dissertation, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (NKUA). School of Philosophy, Department of Byzantine Philology and Folklore. Koumarianou, A. (2008). Aeon. In L. Droulia & G. Koutsopananou (Eds.), Εγκυκλοπαίδεια του Ελληνικού Τύπου, 1784–1974. Εφημερίδες, Περιοδικά, Δημοσιογράφοι, Εκδότες. Τόμος Α [Encyclopedia of the Greek Press, 1784–1974. Newspapers, Magazines, Journalists, Publishers. Volume A] (pp. 153–154). National Hellenic Research Foundation, Institute for Neohellenic Research. Koutsoulenti, S. (2005). Το Αρσάκειο και η συμβολή του στην εκπαίδευση των κοριτσιών (1836–1930) [Arsakeio and its Contribution to the Education of Girls (1836–1930)]. Hellenic Letters. Landauer, A. (1884). Mes premiers vers: Avec une lettre autographe de Victor Hugο. Vienne: Editeur Charles Gerold Fils. Macha-Bizoumi, N. (2012). Amalia Dress: The Invention of a New Costume Tradition in the Service of Greek National Identity. Catwalk: The Journal of Fashion, Beauty and Style, 1(1), 65–90. Mackridge, P. (2009). Language and National Identity in Greece, 1766–1976. Oxford University Press. Marks, P. (1990). Bicycles, Bangs, and Bloomers. The New Woman in the Popular Press. The University Press of Kentucky. Mayer, K. (1957). Ιστορία των Ελληνικών Εφημερίδων [History of the Greek Press]. Volume A, 1700–1900. Dimopoulos. McCombs, M. & Shaw, D. (1972). The Agenda‑Setting Function of Mass Media. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176–187. McRobbie, A. (1991). Feminism and Youth Culture. Macmillan. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M. & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis. A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage. Mill, J. S. (1869). The Subjection of Women. Longmans, Green, Reader, and Dyer. Mulvey, L. (1975). Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema. Screen, 16(3), 6–18. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/screen/16.3.6 Nina-Pazarzi, E. (2019). Φύλο και Εργασία [Gender and Work]. Law Library. Nina–Pazarzi, E. & Tsangaris, M. (2008). Constructing Women’s Image in TV Commercials: The Greek Case. Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 15(1), 29–50. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/097152150701500102 Papadimitriou, D. (2008). Akropolis. In L. Droulia & G. Koutsopananou (Eds.), Εγκυκλοπαίδεια του Ελληνικού Τύπου, 1784–1974. Εφημερίδες, Περιοδικά, Δημοσιογράφοι, Εκδότες. Τόμος Α [Encyclopedia of the Greek Press, 1784–1974. Newspapers, Magazines, Journalists, Publishers. Volume A] (pp. 158–159). National Hellenic Research Foundation, Institute for Neohellenic Research. Papastefanaki, L. (2019). Family, Gender and Labour in the Greek Mines, 1860–1940. International Review of Social History, 65(2), 267–288. Online: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020859019000580 Petropulos, J. A. (1968). Politics and Statecraft in the Kingdom of Greece, 1833–1843. Princeton University Press. Psarra, A. (2008). Σιωπηρές Ιστορίες. Γυναίκες και Φύλο στην Ιστορική Αφήγηση [Silent Stories. Women and Gender in Historical Narratives]. Alexandria. Sachsman, D. B., Rushing, S. K. & Morris, R. (Eds.). (2009). Seeking a Voice. Images of Race and Gender in the 19th Century Press. Purdue University Press. Saldaña, J. (2016). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers (3rd ed.). Sage. Santoniccolo, F., Trombetta, T., Paradiso, M. N. & Rollè, L. (2023). Gender and Media Representations: A Review of the Literature on Gender Stereotypes, Objectification and Sexualization. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(10). Online: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20105770 Stamiris, Ε. (1986). The Women’s Movement in Greece. New Left Review, I/158, 98–114. Stetz, M. D. (2001). The New Woman and the British Periodical Press of the 1890s. Journal of Victorian Culture, 6(2), 272–285. Online: https://doi.org/10.3366/jvc.2001.6.2.272 Thanailaki, P. (2018). Gender Inequalities in Rural European Communities during the 19th and Early 20th Century. Springer. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75235-8 Tuchman, G. (1978). Hearth and Home. Images of Women in the Mass Media. Oxford University Press. Tusan, M. E. (1998). Inventing the New Woman: Print Culture and Identity Politics during the Fin-de-Siecle: 1997 VanArsdel Prize. Victorian Periodicals Review, 31(2), 169–182. Van Zoonen, L. (2000). Feminist Media Studies. Sage. Varika, E. (1987). Η Εξέγερση των Κυριών. Η γένεση μιας φεμινιστικής συνείδησης στην Ελλάδα, 1833–1907 [The Revolt of the Ladies. The Genesis of a Feminist Consciousness in Greece (1833–1907)]. Research and Education Foundation of the Commercial Bank of Greece. Wollstonecraft, M. (1792). A Vindication of the Rights of Woman. Joseph Johnson." ["issueId"]=> int(684) ["pub-id::doi"]=> string(19) "10.17646/KOME.of.40" ["abstract"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(1202) "

This article examines the nineteenth-century Greek press as a communicative system through which gendered visibility, meanings of work, and women’s public identities were discursively constructed within a non-Anglophone national context. Drawing on qualitative content analysis of three historically significant newspapers(Aion, Akropolis and Empros), the study explores how women’s public presence, professional activity and social roles were framed, constrained, or selectively made visible. The findings show that women were predominantly represented through relational identities linked to men or family structures, while references to autonomous professional activity were rare and fragmented. At the same time, the press gradually incorporated selective forms of female visibility in areas such as education, the arts, philanthropy and socially acceptable occupations, particularly towards the end of the century. By focusing on media discourse, symbolic visibility and communicative practices, the article demonstrates that historical press narratives actively shaped gendered public identity and the symbolic boundaries of women’s work, rather than merely reflecting social change.

" } ["subtitle"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(38) " A Communication and Media Perspective" } ["title"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(72) "Representations of Women and Work in the Nineteenth-century Greek Press " } ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["authors"]=> array(1) { [0]=> object(Author)#1046 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(15) { ["id"]=> int(11331) ["email"]=> string(15) "mtsang@unipi.gr" ["includeInBrowse"]=> bool(true) ["publicationId"]=> int(8772) ["seq"]=> int(0) ["userGroupId"]=> int(339) ["country"]=> string(2) "GR" ["orcid"]=> string(37) "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5297-1189" ["url"]=> string(36) "https://miketsag.wixsite.com/website" ["affiliation"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(5) "Array" ["hu_HU"]=> string(48) "a:1:{s:5:"en_US";s:22:"University of Piraeus ";}" } ["biography"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(1401) "

Michael Tsangaris is a member of the Laboratory and Teaching Staff at the School of Economics, Business and International Studies, University of Piraeus. He holds a PhD in Communication and Media Studies from the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, an MA in Mass Media and Communication from the University of Leeds, and a Bachelor’s degree in Business Administration from the Athens University of Economics and Business.

His research focuses on media representations, gender, culture, tourism, and society, with particular emphasis on the construction of social meanings through media and cultural practices. He has published extensively in international journals and edited volumes on topics including popular culture, radical communication, gender representations, and tourism communication.

His recent publications include Communication and Tourism: Reflecting on the Construction of the Tourist Image of Greece (CABI, 2024), Mobility, Tourism and Society (Kallipos, 2022, in Greek), and Radical Communications: Rebellious Expressions on Urban Walls (Rowman & Littlefield, 2021).

" } ["familyName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(9) "Tsangaris" ["hu_HU"]=> string(9) "Tsangaris" } ["givenName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(7) "Michael" ["hu_HU"]=> string(7) "Michael" } ["preferredPublicName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" } ["submissionLocale"]=> string(5) "en_US" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } ["keywords"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> array(6) { [0]=> string(21) "media representations" [1]=> string(24) "gender and communication" [2]=> string(15) "media discourse" [3]=> string(19) "symbolic visibility" [4]=> string(14) "women and work" [5]=> string(25) "historical press analysis" } } ["subjects"]=> array(0) { } ["disciplines"]=> array(0) { } ["languages"]=> array(0) { } ["supportingAgencies"]=> array(0) { } ["galleys"]=> array(1) { [0]=> object(ArticleGalley)#1056 (7) { ["_data"]=> array(9) { ["submissionFileId"]=> int(46447) ["id"]=> int(6817) ["isApproved"]=> bool(false) ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["label"]=> string(3) "PDF" ["publicationId"]=> int(8772) ["seq"]=> int(0) ["urlPath"]=> string(0) "" ["urlRemote"]=> string(0) "" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(true) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_submissionFile"]=> NULL } } } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) }
PDF
object(Publication)#1038 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(24) { ["id"]=> int(8790) ["accessStatus"]=> int(0) ["lastModified"]=> string(19) "2026-05-28 13:36:46" ["primaryContactId"]=> int(11357) ["sectionId"]=> int(133) ["seq"]=> int(0) ["submissionId"]=> int(8665) ["status"]=> int(1) ["version"]=> int(1) ["categoryIds"]=> array(0) { } ["citationsRaw"]=> string(10650) "ATA (2020). Women in Educational Leadership. Needs Assessment Survey. Alberta Teachers’ Association. Online: https://teachers.ab.ca/sites/default/files/2024-09/coor-101-28_women_in_educational_leadership_2022.pdf Babic, A. & Hansez, I. (2021). The Glass Ceiling for Women Managers: Antecedents and Consequences for Work-Family Interface and Well-Being at Work. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. Online: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.618250 Batliwala, S. (2022). Transformative Feminist Leadership: What It Is and Why It Matters. United Nations University – International Institute for Global Health. Online: https://doi.org/10.37941/RR/2022/2 Bertrand, M. (2018). The Glass Ceiling. Becker Friedman Institute for Research in Economics Working Paper, (38). Online: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3191467 Bierema, L. L. (2016). Women’s Leadership: Troubling Notions of the “Ideal” (Male) Leader. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 18(2), 119–136. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422316641398 Bracho, S., Kreckovic, M., Marotte, L., Salama, M. & Xu, N. (2026). Gender, Media, and Power. Insights from MDI’s Work (1998–2024). Media Diversity Research Centre. Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful Qualitative Research. A Practical Guide for Beginners. (1st edition) Sage. Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on Reflexive Thematic Analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806 Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2020). One Size Fits All? What Counts as Quality Practice in (Reflexive) Thematic Analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238 Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic Analysis. A Practical Guide. Sage. Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2023). Toward Good Practice in Thematic Analysis: Avoiding Common Problems and Be(com)ing a Knowing Researcher. International Journal of Transgender Health, 24(1), 1–6. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/26895269.2022.2129597 Byrne, D. (2022). A Worked Example of Braun and Clarke’s Approach to Reflexive Thematic Analysis. Quality & Quantity, 56, 1391–1412. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01182-y Ciminelli, G., Schwellnus, C. & Stadler, B. (2021). Sticky Floors or Glass Ceilings? The Role of Human Capital, Working Time Flexibility and Discrimination in the Gender Wage Gap. OECD Economics Department Working Papers, (1668). Online: https://doi.org/10.1787/02ef3235-en Clarke, J., Hurst, C. & Tomlinson, J. (2024). Maintaining the Meritocracy Myth: A Critical Discourse Analytic Study of Leaders’ Talk about Merit and Gender in Academia. Organization Studies, 45(5), 635–660. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406241236610 Da Rocha Grangeiro, R., Nascimento Silva, L. E. & Esnard, C. (2022). I Broke the Glass Ceiling, Now What? Overview of Metaphors to Explain Gender Inequality in Organizations. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 30(6), 1523–1532. Online: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-07-2020-2281 Diehl, A. & Dzubinski, L. M. (2023). Glass Walls. Shattering the Six Gender Bias Barriers Still Holding Women Back at Work. Rowman & Littlefield. Eagly, A. H. & Carli, L. (2007). Through the Labyrinth. The Truth about How Women Become Leaders. Harvard Business School Press. EIGE (2016). Gender in Employment. European Institute for Gender Equality. Galsanjigmed, E. & Sekiguchi, T. (2023). Challenges Women Experience in Leadership Careers: An Integrative Review. Merits, 3(2), 366–389. Online: https://doi.org/10.3390/merits3020021 Geiger Zeman. M., Miletić, G.-M. & Holy, M. (2024). Women and Workplace Culture in Public Relations and Communication Industries in Croatia. EUPRERA Report, 5(1). Geiger Zeman, M., Miletić, G.-M. & Topić, M. (2025). Well-being and Gender Differences in PR and Communication Sector in Croatia: Descriptive Analysis of Interpersonal Relationships, Work–Life (In) Balance and Experiences of Discrimination. In M. Holy, J. Budak & R. Medić (Eds.), Creativity 360 Degrees. Exploring the Dynamics of the Creative Industries in Southeast Europe (pp. 125–140). Emerald Publishing. Online: https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83662-084-620251011 Giles, E. L. & Harrison, S. L. (2023). Reflecting on the Importance of Theory-informed Qualitative Research in People with Chronic Respiratory Disease and their Carers. Chronic Respiratory Disease, 20. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/14799731231185128 Heilman, M. E. (2012). Gender Stereotypes and Workplace Bias. Research in Organizational Behavior, 32, 113–135. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2012.11.003 Jaiswal, A. & Rao, S. (2019). Women in Leadership: A Step towards Feminism. Research Review International Journal of Multidisciplinary, 4(6), 882–887. Jakobsh, D. (2004). (2004). Barriers to Women’s Leadership. In G. R. Goethals, G. J. Sorenson & J. M. Burns (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Leadership Vol. 4 (pp. 77–80). Sage. Online: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412952392.n23 Kark, R. & Buengeler, C. (2024). Wo~Men and Leadership: Re-Thinking the State of Research on Gender and Leadership Through Waves of Feminist Thinking. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 31(3), 245–266. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/15480518241257105 Keohane, N. O. (2010). Thinking about Leadership. Princeton University Press. Keohane, N. O. (2020). Women, Power & Leadership. Daedalus, 149(1), 236–250. Online: https://doi.org/10.1162/daed_a_01785 Keynton, R. & Lee, K. (2024). Taking the Glass Escalator Theory to School. Socius, 10. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/23780231231217828 Kramer, L. (2011). The Sociology of Gender. A Brief Introduction. Oxford University Press. Kumra, S. (2017). Reflections on Glass: Second Wave Feminist Theorizing in a Third Wave Feminist Age? In S. R. Madsen (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Gender and Leadership (pp. 49–62). Edward Elgar Publishing. Lagarde, M. (2000). Claves feministas para la autoestima de las mujeres. Editorial Horas y Horas. Kanter, R. (1977). Men and Women of the Corporation. Basic Books. Madsen, S. R. (2017). Introduction. In S. R. Madsen (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Gender and Leadership (pp. xxv–xxxvii). Edward Elgar Publishing. Maguire, M. & Delahunt, B. (2017). Doing a Thematic Analysis: A Practical, Step-by-Step Guide for Learning and Teaching Scholars. All Ireland Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 9(3), 3351–33514. Online: https://doi.org/10.62707/aishej.v9i3.335 Mashele, W. & Alagidede, I. P. (2023). When Spotting the Glass Cliff Matters for Women: A Qualitative Study Focusing on Gender Inequalities in Corporate South Africa. In J. Crawford (Ed.), Leadership. Advancing Great Leaders and Leadership (pp. 179–194). IntechOpen. Online: https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.108102 McKinsey & Company (2022). Women in the Workplace 2022. Online: https://womenintheworkplace.com/2022 Medina-Vicent, M. (2015). Women’s Leadership: An Essentialist Concept? Journal of Feminist, Gender and Women Studies, (2), 69–72. Online: https://doi.org/10.15366/jfgws2015.2.008 Morgenroth, T., Ryan, M. K., Rink, F. & Begeny, C. (2021). The (In)Compatibility of Identities: Understanding Gender Differences in Work–Life Conflict through the Fit with Leaders. British Journal of Social Psychology, 60(2), 448–469. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12411 Nguyen, N. T. V. & Recher, V. (2024). Croatia. Gender Landscape 2024. World Bank. Orešković, P. (2024, September 17). Penjanje po hijerarhijskim ljestvicama ne mora biti jedina definicija uspjeha. Women in Adria. Online: https://www.womeninadria.com/hr-direktorica-colas/ Paušić, I. (2024, April 17). Nevena Smolić u 6 godina 4 puta napredovala, čak i tijekom porodiljnog! Women in Adria. Online: https://www.womeninadria.com/opt-banka-it-direktorica/ Polić, M. & Holy, M. (2020). Women in Public Relations in Croatia. EUPRERA Report, 2(2). Polić, M. & Holy, M. (2021). Gender-biased Office Culture in Croatian PR Industry: Why Feminine Sectors Practice Masculine Patterns? Corporate Communications, 26(4), 716–727. Online: https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-04-2021-0042 Povijač, K. (2024, July 29). Ne radite posao koji ste prerasli, djeci ne treba nesretna mama. Women in Adria. Online: https://www.womeninadria.com/brand-managerica-maraska/ Pullen, A. & Vachhani, S. K. (2021). Feminist Ethics and Women Leaders: From Difference to Intercorporeality. Journal of Business Ethics, 173(2), 233–243. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04526-0 Sabharwal, M. (2013). From Glass Ceiling to Glass Cliff: Women in Senior Executive Service. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(2), 399–426. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mut030 Toheed, H., Turi, J. & Ali, W. (2019). Implications of Women Leadership Development with Respect to Feminism. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 6(4), 43–52. Online: https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.64.6332 Topić, M. (2023). “I am not a typical woman. I don’t think I am a role model” – Blokishness, Behavioural and Leadership Styles and Role Models. Journal of Communication Management, 27(1), 84–102. Online: https://doi.org/10.1108/JCOM-05-2022-0055 Tremmel, M. & Wahl, I. (2023). Gender Stereotypes in Leadership: Analyzing the Content and Evaluation of Stereotypes about Typical, Male, and Female Leaders. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. Online: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1034258 Yoong, M. (2020). Professional Discourses, Gender and Identity in Women’s Media. Palgrave Pivot. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55544-3 Watterston, B. & Ehrich, L. C. (2024). Women’s Leadership Development Is Everybody’s Business: If Not Now, When? School Leadership & Management, 44(2), 159–179. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2023.2299942 Weber, M. (1992). The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. Routledge. Wharton, A. S. (2012). The Sociology of Gender. An Introduction to Theory and Research. Blackwell. Women in Adria (s. a.). O nama. Online: https://www.womeninadria.com/o-nama/ Women in Adria (s. a.). About. LinkedIn. Online: https://www.linkedin.com/company/women-in-adria/about/ Women in Adria (2024, June 20). Nina Dusper Sušić iz Hitachi Energy: ‘Ne želim da nam se djeca skuhaju na temperaturi od 50°C’. Women in Adria. Online: https://www.womeninadria.com/predsjednica-upravehitachi-energy/ Women’s Resource Centre (s. a.). Mentorship: The Missing Link in Female Leadership in the UK. Women’s Resource Centre. Online: https://www.wrc.org.uk/blog/mentorship-the-missing-link-in-femaleleadership-in-the-uk" ["issueId"]=> int(684) ["pub-id::doi"]=> string(19) "10.17646/KOME.of.41" ["abstract"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(1018) "

Global statistics confirm a growing number of women in leadership roles, yet gender gaps and underrepresentation persist. This paper reviews feminist literature addressing traditional, contemporary and alternative leadership models, noting that leadership is still predominantly conceptualised through traditional gender categories. Compared to men, women face many gender-based barriers and challenges in developing their leadership careers. In Croatia, efforts to increase gender equality and promoting gender awareness in the business sector are visible through the specialised online portal Women in Adria. The paper analyses mediated meanings and experiences of leadership, gendered challenges, and inequalities in the business sector from the perspective of women leaders from different industries and sectors. A thematic analysis of 38 articles published on the portal in 2024 identified four key themes: women on the leadership path, forms of gender (in)equality, work–life (im)balance and motherhood.

" } ["subtitle"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(73) "Women Leaders' Experiences on the Croatian Business Portal Women in Adria" } ["title"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(38) "Let's Talk about Gender and Leadership" } ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["authors"]=> array(2) { [0]=> object(Author)#1055 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(15) { ["id"]=> int(11357) ["email"]=> string(27) "marija.geigerzeman@pilar.hr" ["includeInBrowse"]=> bool(true) ["publicationId"]=> int(8790) ["seq"]=> int(0) ["userGroupId"]=> int(339) ["country"]=> string(2) "HR" ["orcid"]=> string(37) "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1192-4722" ["url"]=> string(65) "https://www.pilar.hr/o-institutu/zaposlenici/#marija-geiger-zeman" ["affiliation"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(38) "Institute of Social Sciences Ivo Pilar" ["hu_HU"]=> string(64) "a:1:{s:5:"en_US";s:38:"Institute of Social Sciences Ivo Pilar";}" } ["biography"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" } ["familyName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(12) "Geiger Zeman" ["hu_HU"]=> string(12) "Geiger Zeman" } ["givenName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(6) "Marija" ["hu_HU"]=> string(6) "Marija" } ["preferredPublicName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" } ["submissionLocale"]=> string(5) "en_US" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } [1]=> object(Author)#1048 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(15) { ["id"]=> int(11374) ["email"]=> string(19) "mirela.holy@imin.hr" ["includeInBrowse"]=> bool(true) ["publicationId"]=> int(8790) ["seq"]=> int(0) ["userGroupId"]=> int(339) ["country"]=> string(2) "HR" ["orcid"]=> string(37) "https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1294-1978" ["url"]=> string(31) "https://imin.hr/zap-mirelaholy/" ["affiliation"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(32) "Institute for Migration Research" } ["biography"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" } ["familyName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(4) "Holy" } ["givenName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(6) "Mirela" } ["preferredPublicName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" } ["submissionLocale"]=> string(5) "en_US" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } ["keywords"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> array(5) { [0]=> string(10) "leadership" [1]=> string(6) "gender" [2]=> string(17) "gendered barriers" [3]=> string(17) "thematic analysis" [4]=> string(14) "Women in Adria" } } ["subjects"]=> array(0) { } ["disciplines"]=> array(0) { } ["languages"]=> array(0) { } ["supportingAgencies"]=> array(0) { } ["galleys"]=> array(1) { [0]=> object(ArticleGalley)#1057 (7) { ["_data"]=> array(9) { ["submissionFileId"]=> int(46449) ["id"]=> int(6818) ["isApproved"]=> bool(false) ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["label"]=> string(3) "PDF" ["publicationId"]=> int(8790) ["seq"]=> int(0) ["urlPath"]=> string(0) "" ["urlRemote"]=> string(0) "" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(true) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_submissionFile"]=> NULL } } } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) }
PDF

Current Issue

14. Volume, 1. Number | 2026